User talk:Canyoutietheminaknot

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 08:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok. I will not put it back. The DUP is arguably a fascist party in part due to their opposition to a referendum on abortion as the laws would be repealed. This is undemocratic and authoritarian. Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 08:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 08:29, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Sorry for not referencing it. Everything in that edit is accurate. The party is an abomination in terms of social policy. Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 08:32, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McSly (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Sorry. I will try to find a reference. Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 20:02, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * It's simple. If you don't have a reliable source to back up your change, don't edit the article. --McSly (talk) 20:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Ok, McSly, understood. Did you know that Wikipedia is becoming a propaganda tool of the left wing mainstream media? This is because it uses them so heavily for references. It is the echo chamber. Tremendously disgraceful. Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kendrick Lamar. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McSly (talk) 20:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at CNN, you may be blocked from editing. DanielRigal (talk) 21:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Important notice regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people
Neutralitytalk 21:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at CNN. DanielRigal (talk) 21:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

ok i will stopCanyoutietheminaknot (talk) 21:31, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Britain will never suppress my freedom! God save the queen (who backs brexit). Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 21:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

If you think about it, brexit is ordained by almighty god himself!!!!!!! 😁 Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 21:44, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Please read WP:GIANTDICK. PhilKnight (talk) 21:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Well thank you very much, it's only average sized Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 21:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

PhilKnight I have no intention of vandalising Wikipedia. Good evening from The United Kingdom. Canyoutietheminaknot (talk) 22:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Blocked
Between you this mess-o-crazy, this failure to assume good faith, this instance where you compare you being inconvenienced to the oppression of the North Korean people, this conspiracy theorizing, this unsourced accusation, this whitewashing, and other opinion-mongering, it's hard to tell if you're a troll or just incapable of editing neutrally.

However, since you apparently don't get how stupidly dishonest it is to forge a post by another user, the only reasonable response I can figure as an administrator is:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

The only way anyone would consider unblocking you is if you agreed to a topic ban from articles relating to politics and race. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)