User talk:CapJ62/Communist Party of Cuba

First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? The information provided is both neutral and reliable, though the words tend to be loaded. There needs to be more content added. The addition of the opportunistic alliance makes clearer the next sentences, so that is good. I would say though the word "opportunistically" can be interpreted in a negative fashion. Generally, the meaning is clear. The sources are reliable, as Brittannica is a reputable organization.

What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? I would suggest the author use less loaded language. Instead of using "opportunistically" you could use "strategically" because it would be more neutral. More content needs to be added as well. because more information is needed. Also, a wider variety of sources are needed.

What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Add more information from more sources.

Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know Yes. I also need to add more information.