User talk:Capitalismojo/Archive 1

AfD Nomination
Bebe Bryans, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Mrh30 (talk) 12:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Laona
I answered your question in long form on my talkpage. That's why it took so long to get an answer.  Royal broil  19:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

20 years in state govt.?
What agency? -- Orange Mike  &#x7C;   Talk  15:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC) (DCF; on break)
 * I started in DILHR and ended at DOA. No longer a state employee.Capitalismojo (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Coords
Hi. When you're adding coordinates to an article, note whether your source is using decimal degrees or degrees, minutes, & seconds, and format accordingly. For instance, according to the [ GNIS], Laona Junction is at Latitude(DEC) 	Longitude(DEC) 	Latitude(DMS) 	Longitude(DMS) 45.6560737 	-88.6940028 	453922N 	0884138W The latter pair needs to be split:, but the former pair could be used as-is:. —WWoods (talk) 21:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Many thanks for your comments. I find the Wisconsin towns to be very interesting-unique history, etc. The same can be said of the unincorporated communities in Wisconsin.RFD (talk) 21:53, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks-
Many thanks for your comments-I hope you are feeling better.I know what it is like not feeling very well.Also I help out with the Padus, Wisconsin article.RFD (talk) 21:55, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Michael Kelly
Regarding Michael Kelley - many neoconservatives still think of themselves as liberals. Originally, the term neoconservative was used to describe liberals who moved to the right, politically. Then during the Reagan years a large number of former liberals took to the concept, beginning with Irving Kristol and Norman Podhoretz, the founders of the modern ideology of neoconservatism. While Michael Kelley calls himself a liberal and vigorously defends that position, he is indeed much more aligned politically with Iraq policies of the neo-neocons, I suppose they should be called. There's a great article about neocons here on Wikipedia which discusses the origins. Age Happens (talk) 04:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Some of them are renegade social democrats, many formerly members of the old Social Democrats USA; and there is a controversial theory that some of their ideological underpinning derives from the fact that their movement is led by a cadre of ex-Trotskyites. We've got at least one local guy who I think of as a neo-con, takes a reactionary stance on school-related matters in particular; but he still shows up at the annual Socialist Party of Milwaukee picnic and expects to be welcomed. -- Orange Mike  &#x7C;   Talk  14:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not like the old days, with the Red Falcons and so on; but there is still a S.P. branch in Milwaukee, and the annual picnic draws a lot of progressives who no longer affiliate with the S.P. I remember my daughter (now thirteen; then five years old or so) singing Union Maid along with the rest of the crowd one year, to everybody's bemusement. -- Orange Mike  &#x7C;   Talk  12:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * And this past Saturday's annual picnic was again fun, although the average age of those attending (about 30-35 in total) was well over 50, I fear. -- Orange Mike  &#x7C;   Talk  17:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Business Plot
Is currently under major revision by one person. You might wish to approise yourself of these revisions. Collect (talk) 00:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

One user I reported to Jclemens for 4RR -- I wonder if he realized it? Collect (talk) 00:29, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

You might also look at Daily Mail which is beset also by SPA type accounts. Or might not. Collect (talk) 00:29, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I have addressed your concerns on the link issue on the talk page. Wikipedia has no requirement that everything has to be linked. As you also know not everything from the committes report is in the PDF source. Are you seriously suggesting that the quote is made up?


 * I don't know what reference your making to the word "alleged" in my edit of the article.annoynmous 02:26, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Well if you bothered to go to the talk page, but neverthless here they are:

^ Investigation of Nazi Propaganda Activities and Investigation of Certain Other Propaganda Activities: Public Hearings Before the Special Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives, Seventy-third Congress, Second Session, at Washington, D.C. p.8-114 D.C. 6 II Schmidt, p. 245 "HUAC's final report to Congress: "There is no question that these attempts [the plot] were discussed, were planned, and might have been placed in execution when and if the financial backers deemed it expedient." The committee had verified "all the pertinent statements made by General Butler, with the exception of the direct statement suggesting the creation of the organization."" ^ Investigation of Nazi Propaganda Activities and Investigation of Certain Other Propaganda Activities: Public Hearings Before the Special Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives, Seventy-third Congress, Second Session, at Washington, D.C. p. 111 D.C. 6 II.


 * Both these sources comply with wikipedia reliable sources guidelines. Not to mention Arthur Schlesinger who is a reputable historian stated:

As for McCormack's House committee, it declared itself "able to verify all the pertinent statements made by General Butler" except for MacGuire's direct proposal to him, and it considered this more or less confirmed by MacGuire's European reports."


 * The Committe's final report has not yet been added to the PDF files. There is no requirement on wikipedia that you have to able to read every source. So unless you have reason to believe that this uote is false than there is no reason to use the word "alleged" when the committe found that that evidence for the existence of a plot was sound. annoynmous 02:38, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


 * That's not the entire report. There are pages missing and the final conclusion has yet to be scanned. annoynmous 02:58, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


 * This is not the complete report. The exact same pages are missing from the PDF File as they are from the wikisource page. I have given two reliable sources that show that the quote represented the committes findings. annoynmous 03:11, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

(out) Said editor is now topic banned for a year. And has a 3RR block as well. And is now under 1RR. Trifecta. So much for that. Collect (talk) 18:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Ruth Conniff
Take a look at what I've done. I'm still not sure she'd pass a notability review, despite my Wisconsinite pride. -- Orange Mike  &#x7C;   Talk  14:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)