User talk:Capnpitz

Shumer/Leahy
I hadn't noticed the new reference. Sorry. I have now read it. Remarkably similar statement, as if they were in the same meeting...but nothing supports that particular speculation. I think both references should be used, saying both Leahy and Shumer reported the commitment. Objections? -- Yellowdesk 03:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ConLawLogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ConLawLogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)