User talk:Caprice 96

File permission problem with File:1973 Ford Gran Torino Sport.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:1973 Ford Gran Torino Sport.jpg, which you've attributed to Peter Maas. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Chevrolet Caprice
I see you added a lot of the material in Chevrolet Caprice. However you didn't add citations or references. Do you have any recollection of where you got the information? Felsic2 (talk) 15:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Footnotes/citations would benefit of future readers and editors, though little of it appears controversial. FYI, there is a discussion over what the article should include, in case you're interested. See talk:Chevrolet Caprice. Felsic2 (talk) 15:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I guess the problem is that, since this is a collaborative effort, future editors may come along and want to revise or verify something but not know where it came from. The parts that would be most important to footnote are quotations and opinions. A secondary issue concerns the value of including Fact A vs Fact B in an article. How many specifications or options should be included versus reviewers' opinions vs recalls vs historic context? The answer is partly based on where the information is found. Material from the highest quality sources, like mainstream media and scholarly sources, has a higher priority than the lowest quality sources, like catalogs and brochures. So that's another reason it helps to know where it came from. Felsic2 (talk) 15:34, 23 September 2016 (UTC)