User talk:Capricorn42/Archive8

Category:Internet television channels
Thanks for reverting the edits back to a clean version of Category:Internet television channels It is so easy to miss multiple vandalisms when it is done by multiple users. Thanks for catching my error. Dbiel (Talk) 15:24, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * yep --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 20:39, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

You got me.
I tried to revert the vandalism on 1956 FA Cup Final, but you got them before me. Good job. HaGamal 21:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Flagging My Page
Yeah so... why did you feel you had to flag my 'The pop princesses' page? I'd like to see an explanation.

2bjewled (talk) 23:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Its a non-notable band, see WP:N. Nothing personal against you.--Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 23:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, I take it personal alright. What do you mean it's a 'non-notable band'?
 * I gave you the link above. To be specific Notability (music). Your band does not satisfy the criteria for inclusion. Thanks--Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 23:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh, that's just stupid. The least you could do is leave it. If you didn't notice I had a GREAT reason why to keep it. 2bjewled (talk) 23:15, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I gave you the reason why I flaged your page above. Thanks for the message.--Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 23:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you...
...for catching and reverting the vandalism to my user page earlier today. Much appreciated! If you're in the U.S., happy Thanksgiving; otherwise, have a great weekend! --Tkynerd (talk) 01:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * And again, while I was asleep! :) --Tkynerd (talk) 16:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

FINAL SOLUTION OF THE PAKI QUESTION
PAKISTAN IS A LAND OF TERRORIST AND DRUG TRAFFICKERS. ONE DAY INDIA WILL ARRIVE AT THE FINAL SOLUTION OF THE PAKI QUESTION AND ATTACKS LIKE THIS WOULD BE OVER. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.167.15.215 (talk • contribs)

sorry
I just had to change it for a sec. so I could print it out as a joke.Aib662 (talk) 03:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

IRC
Hey Unpopular you should get on irc.freenode.net/wikipedia-en. Very interesting talk you may enjoy =p. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 05:15, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I know
But, with all due respect, the lame duck is still President of the United States. 204.52.215.107 (talk) 05:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


 * He is not a lame duck. He is George W. Bush Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 05:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

um..so? Did I say anything about President of the United States? :S --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 05:49, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Jon Cerny
The attack is "Cerny also has a slight infatuation with the cock as well as the Narwhal." A school kid is making fun of their teacher. &mdash;Noah 06:20, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Darts player form New Infobox plus help required...
Hi, I've just created a template called template: Darts player form which allows you to input the players results for the past 4 years. I've only added it to Phil Taylor's article for now. Take a look and see what you think. I won't really have time to edit all the top players and source the info, but I've posted this message on many users pages so it may be used.

In addition, I've not really had the time to update 2008 in darts which has been bereft of updates since around September. The Pro Tour results are also lacking updates. It may not be a page that continues with 2009 in darts if its not significant enough. Again, if you or any other user wants to take control of adding results then I'd really appreciate it. Seedybob (talk) 11:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry but I have no knowledge about darts. I suggest you go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports and see if anyone can help, or find some member who is active in that part of the wiki. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 13:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi
HEY SCREW YOU IMMENCELY You Are Like The Biggest Douchebag Ever Go and like Change It Back Please I'm Sorry Have A Muffin Toastyghost1 (talk) 12:13, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page. StaticGull Talk  15:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome :) --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 15:26, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Lol
Whats wrong with it? Do you even know who I am? 72.89.201.145 (talk) 16:15, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

vandalism
Hey there! Can you take a look at New World Order (conspiracy theory) since there are edits removing references (November 26-27). Thanks! ~ All Is One ~ (talk) 20:49, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * An IP removed content but he also provided an edit summary. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 20:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

hi
i was trying to put a shops name on that article which the other shops put theire name on it why it didnt accept that shops name ı dont understand thanks

Fair use rationale for Image:Hemant karkare.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hemant karkare.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It has the required rationale now. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 06:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

George Washington's Thanksgiving Proclamation of 1789
WHEREAS it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favour; and Whereas both Houses of Congress have, by their joint committee, requested me "to recommend to the people of the United States a DAY OF PUBLICK THANKSGIVING and PRAYER, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness:"

NOW THEREFORE, I do recommend and assign THURSDAY, the TWENTY-SIXTH DAY of NOVEMBER next, to be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country previous to their becoming a nation; for the signal and manifold mercies and the favorable interpositions of His providence in the course and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty which we have since enjoyed; — for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enable to establish Constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now lately instituted; — for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; — and, in general, for all the great and various favours which He has been pleased to confer upon us.

And also, that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations and beseech Him to pardon our national and other transgressions; — to enable us all, whether in publick or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually; to render our National Government a blessing to all the people by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed; to protect and guide all sovereigns and nations (especially such as have shewn kindness unto us); and to bless them with good governments, peace, and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and us; and, generally to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as he alone knows to be best.

GIVEN under my hand, at the city of New-York, the third day of October, in the year of our Lord, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-nine.

George Washington

Source: The Massachusetts Centinel, Wednesday, October 14, 1789 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wes.wortman (talk • contribs)

Ding!
I sent you an email. =) Please reply (if you want) by email. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:30, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Never
Never is a disbiguation page, I wanted to add more info to the word. The page will look complicated.

I thougt I create a separate article for the word and kepp the rest as a dis, page

Warrington (talk) 10:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. You may want to read it, it is rather funny. I thougt that I will remove the content about the  word "never" from the dis. page than and add

Never (word). Is that ok?

PS weird but when You leve me a message the computer crashes. Wonder why? -

Warrington (talk) 11:02, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Cheers
Thanks for changing my user page back to how it was, I do know the person who did it though, but it's cool that you did what you did. Right on Brother!!!! Don't know why I said that You didn't change the tally thing though, which makes me sad, or not; I am a man I don't get sad, not even a tiny bit!

Once again Cheers, keep up the good work! --Nikolai Angel Patreilyiov 17:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Changed teh tally thing too :) --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 17:20, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

hey
stop reverting my edits it's edit warring!!!!!!!!! 99.0.69.191 (talk) 17:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
[warning removed by author]
 * Sorry yeah i know your huggle did something wrong:p --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 18:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sorry about that. -- Nn123645 (talk) 18:27, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

EggOne
I blocked a whole bunch of socks and re-blocked some of the IPs. It seems the sockpuppeteer is actually Eggd2, not EggOne, so you may want to reconsider tagging all the EggOne socks as Eggd2 socks. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 18:20, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

My recent edit to "Dustbin Baby"
Hi, I was just wondering if you actually checked the edit I made to the article before reverting it. I was just fixing a typo, for the second time, which I don't think is "vandalism" :( After I got told off for not using an edit summary the first time I tried to fix it, I added a summary where I said I was fixing a typo. It still got reverted. Sorry if I did something wrong... whatever happened to "don't bite the newcomers" though? Regards, 82.181.71.70 (talk) 19:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks, I appreciate it. Was pretty discouraging to get labeled a vandal just like that, that's all. Happy editing. 82.181.71.70 (talk) 19:45, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Fred West Biography
The biography of Fred west states that there was suggested incest in his family yet it then states this did happen. This is a contradiction and I feel this shows the artical is flawed in some areas in regard to facts.

82.27.227.164 (talk) 05:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of HackBuntu
Hi

You deleted my article!!!



Why!!!???!!!???

Please put it back on, or let me do it (lucky I had history on my browser, so was able to put it in gedit) --Panarchy (talk) 09:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, I read your article; your distro doesn't even have a download link/website, let alone third party sources so it clearly fails the criteria for inclusion. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 09:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

I have fixed it up;

Please keep it on.

And about your question about Download links... see the sub heading 'get it'.

Thanks

--Panarchy (talk) 09:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Under the 'get it' heading you said "I will upload the distro when its ready". Your article still fails notability. Once you get the distro's name on distrowatch, please come back and try again. Thanks. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 10:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

No... you misread me. Continue reading under that heading. You will read "If I get requests for a download link, (even just one request!), I will upload it." --Panarchy (talk) 10:11, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Either way its non-notable distro. Logging off now, take care! --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 10:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!!
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page --RedKiteUK (talk) 13:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Cheers
Thanks for quickly reverting the vandalism on my page :) QueenCake (talk) 14:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Thegreatestmoever
Hiya, I've noticed you've placed a level 1 warning on the talk page of Thegreatestmoever, regarding the recent vandalism of the User:NAHID page. What you may not have noticed, however, is that I also placed a level 1 warning for vandalism on this user's page a few days ago, which they subsequently blanked. I've restored my warning, and left a note asking Thegreatestmoever to not blank warnings in future, but I just thought you may want to be aware of this, in case knowing of the previous warning would have made you use a level 2 or higher warning. Xmoogle (talk) 18:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note. Huggle decided to give him a Level 1 warning because there were no other warnings issued in the last 24 hrs, but if I was doing it manually/with TW I think I would have dropped a Level 2 warning. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 18:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
The recent edit you made to User:OryHara constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.153.195.165 (talk • contribs)

Vandalism
The recent edit you made to User:OryHara constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. JonTheSavage (talk) 12:15, 30 November 2008 (CST)

Vandalism Final Warning
The recent edit you made to User:Unpopular_Opinion constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. JonTheSavage (talk) 12:18, 30 November 2008 (CST)

How is that vandalism?
How is that vandalism if one is your own page, and one never happened? It never shows up in User:OryHara's history. And also 12.153.195.165, please sign your posts. Moo  cows   rule 09:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Its not. That's why I archived it.--Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 11:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Status
Hey, can you update your online/offline status button? I would, but I don't know how. Jonathan321 (talk) 16:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, this is Template:Statustop (installation documentation is available there). If you want clearer instructions read this. Cheers! --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 16:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Completely misunderstood you heh. I sometimes forget to update it. :) --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 20:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Just to say cheers for undoing the vandalism on my userpage. Much appreciated. Gonzonoir (talk) 16:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 19:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

I HATE YOU! I MADE A VERY VERY CONSTRUCTIVE change to the GE08 PG!!!!! AND YOU CANCELLED IT OUT U MEANY! I'm sorry But what what with the stupidtacular name, fu-reakie!! luv u, LILY J

ps. ill b stopping by often. hop u anticipate my every beautiful luciously xseya VISIT —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.35.158 (talk • contribs)

Please help
Hi, everytime i add my micronation to the list you delete it and i dont no why!!! I got one message saying dont put up nonscence, it isn't nonscence please please help me tp put it up a certain way so you wont delete it i will modify it if you wish!!!!

93.95.81.129 (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2008 (UTC)jamie


 * Hi, you must provide a reliable source source to prove that this nation exists and is notable. Some third party source like news articles. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 19:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Is ther any other way about it i could list some of my citizens or something!! Its completly possible to start your own country, im not crazy!! and mine is completly real!!
 * Unfortunately, no. Wikipedia needs third party sources. Try getting some publicity in local newspapers/TV channels first. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 19:41, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * See also User talk:Adolphus79.   — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 19:40, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * In the interest of keeping all of the conversation in one place (or as much of it as possible), I will make my reply here. We (Wikipedians) have some standards for what can, and can not, be included.  We are not tring to say you are lying, or that your micronation does not exist.  We just ask that you have some evidence.
 * We have notability and verifiability concerns. Since your micronation was just created, I am concluding that...
 * No one outside of you and your friends knows about it (WP:MADEUP)
 * There have been no newspaper articles, books, etc. written about it (WP:RS)
 * No one at WP:WikiProject Micronations has heard of it (not a policy, but a fairly decent fountain of knowledge about micronations)
 * I invite you to come back later, once there are a good number of people that know who or what Mittendale is, and you've been mentioned in a couple books or newspaper articles... Maybe even register a username, and work on your article in your userspace (I'll explain what that means later) until such time... - Adolphus79 (talk) 20:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

128.2.206.85
Hi. Please participate in the discussion of the subject IP Address at AIV. Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 19:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok I'm taking a look at AIV report. Thanks for the note as I'm involved in the reverting process.--Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 19:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

In regards to, I might have been drunk at the time of that edit. I do, however, stand by the general sentiment of my statement. That guy is disgusting. 72.136.137.24 (talk) 21:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)