User talk:Capricornio1919x

Welcome!
Hello, Capricornio1919x, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 17:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Confusion and using sources that don't discuss the subject
At Mapuche and Indigenous peoples of the Americas you've used sources that don't seem to discuss the subject at all. You are very confused about the Solutrean hypothesis which is about the French, not the Spanish Solutrean culture and concerns claims about East Coast artefacts, not New Mexican ones. Something I don't expect you to know is that if you want to add ways in which the Mapuche arrived you need to use sources that discuss the Mapuche. Moreover, the Mapuche culture only came into existence many thousands of years before Native Americans arrived so the origins of their remote ancestors are irrelevant.

Did I miss something about your source at  Does it really back yur statment that "Other arqueological remains are found in California and date from 130,000 years ago, which can´t explain the theory of tree migration of Greenberg." as well as your claim about Spanish Solutrean finds in New Mexico? Doug Weller talk 18:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC)