User talk:Caprikan

Welcome!
Hello, Caprikan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Aanjan Bhattacharya, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Velella  Velella Talk 19:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Aanjan Bhattacharya


A tag has been placed on Aanjan Bhattacharya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  Velella Talk 19:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I'm not sure why you have recreated the article without waiting for a reply, since without improvements it will just get deleted again. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to him, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what he claims or interviewing him or his management. You gave no references at all. His notability depends on the awards you say he has won, but you need references from the award web sites to prove that he won them.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: a name not new to the people... Melody defines him... one of the most melodious track... Words are not enough to describe his melody and musical creations... with a dream&mdash; we need facts, not gushing fan-talk
 * You introduced spammy formatting such as only using his first name (in true fan style) writing his name in capital letters and bolding his job of Music Director and Singer (also with lead capitals, despite not being proper nouns)


 * the article was a copyright violation of this shameless self-promotion. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
 * Your edits indicate that you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that he is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
 * If you are being paid directly or indirectly to write this article, you are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

For your article to survive, you must provide independent third-party sources as defined above, write neutral facts rather than a fan page, and write in your own words, not copied text. You must reply to my COI request above before editing further too Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Caprikan Reply
Thanks for Your prompt reply.I am very disappointed to know that the page is deleted as I have been trying to create this page for some time and I thought I am contributing in improving the database of Wikipedia. Can you please suggest how should I create this page as I cannot directly relate to the reasons you have stated or may be I am unable to understand it like what is independent verifiable references ?. All I can say is the information that I am trying to update is authentic. Please help me creating this article. 223.176.138.8 (talk) 10:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Independent sources include national newspapers, magazines and journals (and their websites) giving facts rather than opinions. For each of the claimed awards, you need to link to the page of the awarding body's web site that shows that he has in fact won the award.
 * You cannot copy text from websites, especially not his shameless vanity page, you must write in your own words
 * You must write neutral facts, not the gushing self-praise you copied from his website. If you really think that Words are not enough to describe is authentic, you really shouldn't be writing this article
 * Please not that you must reply to my question about a conflict of interest before you attempt to create the article again. I note that you have not edited any other articles; if you have a connection with him, you must say so, or you will be blocked
 * Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)