User talk:Capriwu

Speedy deletion nomination of Juerg Kaufmann


Hello. A tag has been placed on Juerg Kaufmann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Yinta n  13:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your article
I added 'advertising/promotional' to the deletion reason. Words like 'passion' and 'compelling' do not belong in an encyclopaedia, at least not in the context in which you used them. As it stood, it would have required a complete rewrite. If you try again, you must write in a non-promotional way, avoiding PR buzzwords and peacock phrases WP:PEACOCK. First, please read WP:BIO about notability for persons, and also WP:RS about the reliable independent sources needed to prove the notability for anything. Get your material together, and create a draft at User:Capriwu/DRAFT (click it and save it). In user space, you are safe from the patrollers, except for promotion/advertising, copyright violation, attack, or hoax. When you think you've got it together, ask MelanieN or Ritchie333 for an opinion. (Type User talk: into the search bar, followed by their name.) They are both good rescuers, and admins too so they can see what I deleted. Look at other articles - ones that don't have notices at the top calling for improvement. See how they are written without either enthusiasm or disgust. Peridon (talk) 18:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)