User talk:CapsLockA

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Ali Sadeghian.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ali Sadeghian.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Question for administrator
 --CapsLockA (talk) 12:00, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:28, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Question for administrator
<Could you please reinstate Ali Sadeghian's image. I had provided a Source and a Copyright Liscensing for the image as follows: The image was retrieved from Ali Sadeghian's website http://www.dorefa.com on 3rd of April 2012. As for its copyright status, there are no copyright restrictions since the owner of the image, Ali Sadeghian, has explicitly allowed for the picture to be downloaded based on the statement on the foregoing website which reads: "Few pictures and songs, free to download". The image that was uploaded to Ali Sadeghian's article was one of the pictures that was permitted to be downloaded. I hope this explanation suffices and it would be appreciated to have the image restored. Thank you.> --CapsLockA (talk) 07:21, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid "Free to download" is not the same as "Free to republish under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License", so it's not suitably licensed. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC)