User talk:CaptJayRuffins

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!


 * I read your message contesting the deletion of the article. Nothing you wrote, unfortunately, addressed the problem: that you were copying in large chunks of copyrighted text. Assuming the organization meets the guidelines for notability, you are welcome to create another article in your own words. —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Vulcan Society FDNY
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vulcan Society FDNY, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.vulcansocietyfdny.org/History.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vulcan Society FDNY


A tag has been placed on Vulcan Society FDNY requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.vulcansocietyfdny.org/History.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Deletion
The source you copied the article from states at the bottom of the page "Content copyright 2014. vulcan society. All rights reserved". This means that the text cannot be brought into Wikipedia. WP is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 3.0 for free use by anyone anywhere, including commercial use and modification. The text you imported is not free to use as it is not licensed in a compatible way with Wikipedia's license. Please see also WP:COPYVIO. If you intend to do a fresh article, please read WP:GROUP and WP:RS about reliable independent sources. Also please note that you should not give the address and email address as this is usually regarded as being promotional. It can also lead to spamming. Peridon (talk) 22:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, CaptJayRuffins. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.Deb (talk) 16:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stentorians (March 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:CaptJayRuffins Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:CaptJayRuffins reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 18:17, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Stentorians


A tag has been placed on Draft:Stentorians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://negroartist.com/civil%20rights.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 (talk) 18:18, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry for the rollback of Draft:Stentorians I thought someone vandlaized by blanking, when I see it was a draft, I changed back again.

best greeetings, Dan Koehl (talk) 22:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Does that mean it's back as a draft?
Still struggling with the markup... CaptJayRuffins (talk) 22:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * now just go back and totally blank your draft.
 *  Bfpage &#124;leave a message 22:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (The Stentorians) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating The Stentorians, CaptJayRuffins!

Wikipedia editor Bfpage just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice job on the article"

To reply, leave a comment on Bfpage's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Draft of List African-American professional organizations
Hello,

Thank you for working on categorizing the organizational categories. I've worked mostly with women's groups but it's nice to see you taking up the fire fighting organizations.

One tip with categories, they don't usually contain actual information other than the articles in the category. Some contain a little header explaining what should go in the category but that's all. So you don't lose the work of your list I'm copying it here per WP:G6. (I was going to put in on your sandbox page but that's a redirect so I wasn't sure if you would get it.) Good luck. RevelationDirect (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Valiant Society, NJ -
 * Austin African-American Firefighters Assoc, Austin TX (AAAFA) -
 * Vulcan Society Inc., New York, N.Y., -
 * Phoenix Society Inc., Hartford, Connecticut, -
 * Vulcan Pioneers of New Jersey Inc., Newark, N.J., -
 * Vulcan Pioneers of Hudson County Inc., Jersey City, N.J., -
 * Valiants Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. -
 * Lexington Fraternal Order of Black Firefighters - Start Year : 1990 orig. formed in the 1980s, Brothers Loving Others and Opposing Destruction (BLOOD) was reorganized and the name was changed in 1990. -
 * Santa Clara County Black Firefighters Association (SCCBFA) -
 * Omaha Association of Black Professional Fire Fighters -
 * Black Chief Officers Committee of the IABPFF (BCOC)-

I moved your draft into a page in your own user space where you can work on it before someone deletes it while it is still in process. It is here: User:CaptJayRuffins/draft/List of African-American professional organizations
 *  Bfpage &#124;leave a message 16:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Another editor writing about African-American firefighters
I know this is crazy, but there is another brand new editor writing about African American firefighters. She is: User:BeeCeePhoto
 *  Bfpage &#124;leave a message 20:14, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Phoenix Society


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 17:45, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stentorians has been accepted
 Stentorians, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 20:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Stentorians help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Valiants (April 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Valiants and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Valiants has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Valiants. Thanks! TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Valiants (firefighters) has been accepted
 The Valiants (firefighters), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:53, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

WERD
Hi! I just noticed your addition of WERD—owned by Jesse B. Blayton, Sr.—to List of African-American firsts was reverted for lack of a citation. WERD and Blayton were already in the list at the year 1949. There is also an article in in Wikipedia for the station at WERD (historic radio station). No article for Blayton yet. — Neonorange (Phil) — 03:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Please note the 1RR restriction in particular. Icewhiz (talk) 15:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ed Castleberry
Hi, I'm Ajpolino. CaptJayRuffins, thanks for creating Ed Castleberry!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please fill out the URLs you cited to avoid WP:LINKROT. Thanks! Otherwise the article looks great!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ajpolino (talk) 19:44, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Increase Carpenter
Hello CaptJayRuffins,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Increase Carpenter for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium (talk) 19:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Abbreviating political subdivisions
Thanks for adding a relevant picture and caption to Windmill. I want to point you to English Wikipedia's style guide section: MOS:POSTABBR. Generally, using postal abbreviations—such as CA for California, or WA for Washington or Western Australia—is discouraged as they're less likely to be widely understood by our global audience, or could be interpreted as two or more political subdivisions. I went ahead and expanded NY to New York in the caption you added. →‎ GS →‎ ☎ → 06:50, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Pantigo Windmill
Hey, your new article Pantigo windmill (Easthampton, New York) popped up on my watchlist, i suppose it must have linked to something i created long ago.

It looks like it is a valid topic for an article, but I don't think it is a separately listed place on the National Register, because I think we have most of those covered already, at least in New York State. I don't see it mentioned in National Register of Historic Places listings in East Hampton (town), New York. Is it included in the Pantigo Road Historic District, perhaps? What is your evidence that it is NRHP listed? Perhaps it has an NRHP plaque on it, which a contributing building in an NRHP historic district can carry, without being separately listed. Or i worry if it is an alternate name for an NRHP-listed windmill already having an article.

I would like to help you get it described and connected in, properly. I mostly edit NRHP articles, myself. Either way, I am sure this can get sorted out eventually, and I thank you for contributing. Cheers, --Doncram (talk) 23:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Oh, i see from the NRHP reference number that you provided in the article, which is for the East Hampton Village District, that it must be a contributing resource in that district. Hmm, the East Hampton Village District article is pretty weak.  Unfortunately the New York State copies of NRHP nomination documents were all moved, so I don't see how to read the NRHP document for the district. --Doncram (talk) 23:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * as I pointed out on your talk, it's in the backyard of HSH, next door is Mulford then Tuthill house is next to that and the church on the other side, the village green, the cemetery, the pond the old church, Gardiner mill, the rebuilt saltbox(not recognized, they tore down the orig saltbox) Rev Thomas James marker are all in the NRHP. I could use help with the NRHP infobox coordinates, i just lost the one in Mulford Farmhouse CaptJayRuffins (talk) 23:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * I got your note at my talk page, great. I am happy to "watchlist" here and have just a single discussion here, not split, but please do feel free to contact me at my Talk page, especially if I seem to have missed something here. Feel free also to join wp:NRHP and, whether or not you join, to post at its Talk page wt:NRHP.
 * Hmm, I am not sure they all need separate articles, perhaps they could be covered together in the village historic district article, each with a separate section? But if there is separate documentation available, as you have found to be the case for the windmill, it is also okay to have separate, split-out articles about the more major contributing resources in a district.  It's a judgment call to split out or not.
 * Hmm, the HAER documentation which you included in the windmill article states "This is one of the mills built by Nathaniel Dominy V", contrary to the name you assert as builder, presumably based on a different source. It is okay if there exists contradictory sources, we just probably should note the disagreement. Oh, hmm the HAER documentation goes on in its text to say Samuel Schellinger was the builder. --Doncram (talk) 00:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, I think the name of the article should probably be Pantigo Windmill. The parenthetical mention of town/village is not needed, assuming that there is no other place named "Pantigo Windmill". You could move it to that name, yourself, by selecting "move" from the tabs available at top of page (perhaps hidden under "More"). --Doncram (talk) 23:55, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

I debated the naming, but after finding that every last one of these windmills were moved, it make sense to add the town. If you look at the list, every windmill deserves its own entry due to the importance to the community at some point in their lives. The village green can be expanded, but the museums all deserve their own articles. The village green article will have the poles, the stones, the seats, the arbors, the churches and the graves, but the windmills of the east end each get their story told. I just working on the ones in the NRHP first, the hayground was an outlier, googlemaps mis-directed me and it was a doozy to find, just getting google to fix that mess will take some doing. Gardiner Mill is incorrectly placed over in amagansett, where that mill burnt to the ground in 1924. It really is on James lane across from his grave.CaptJayRuffins (talk) 00:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Here's the thing, I need help with the articles like the village green. The windmills is a start, see Category= Windmills in New York (state) and I plan to expand on the ones on the east end. but there is the problem of the underlying districts. I shot Quogue, now I have to write the Quogue Historical district article. But I'm still in windmills, and fleshing out the village. If I send pics, can you help? (talk) 00:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Updated the East Hampton Village District, will return to it later.. I think I can do the same with a stub like this for the Quogue Historical district, (not to tell the story in pictures, but to get a starting point for a full article... (talk) 01:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * In partial response:
 * About your having taken and/or being able to take more photos, that is hugely helpful. Please do upload those to Commons (commons.wikimedia.org), which holds photos that display in Wikipedia (in the English language wikipedia and all other language wikipedias, too).  There is an "upload file" link to click which brings you to here, and I see a "help" service mentioned there if you have any difficulty.  If by "sending a photo to me" you mean literally emailing one to me, that wouldn't help directly, because I would not be able to upload it to Commons myself, not being able to assert copyright ownership myself.
 * Yes getting Google maps to fix anything sounds tedious. For coordinates corrections within Wikipedia, we can just do that directly.  I often use coordinates that I obtain from Google maps satellite view, then right-click to see "what's here" in order to see a copy-paste-able set of coordinates, in order to get better coordinates to use in articles.
 * About categories, there is Category:Mill museums in New York (state) as well as Category:Windmills in New York (state) to add to some of these articles.
 * I am surprised there is not a List of windmills in New York or other explicit list-article to cover the historic windmills, both the ones having articles and those which do not (to be shown either as redlinks calling for articles, or to be shown as "blacklinks" not suggesting articles). To cover places like the one you mentioned being destroyed in 1924.  A list-article can cover stuff which a category cannot. [Yay, there is such a list-article, "List of windmills in New York".  By all means add to it, including adding multiple sentences to the notes column wherever needed to explain something adequately.--Doncram (talk) 14:37, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Improved the list of windmills in NY, still a work in progress.. CaptJayRuffins (talk) 17:10, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey, perhaps User:Mjroots or others of WikiProject Mills could help somehow about the mills.
 * --Doncram (talk) 14:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I already covered the points you mentioned, see above. I've added a couple of hundred images to the commons this month, maybe you can use some. I was sending you the link to the NRHP ones to help with the article. Here it is anyhoo.... https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/CaptJayRuffins&ilshowall=1 CaptJayRuffins (talk) 14:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The only comment I have is that Infobox Windmill could be used, but that is up to you. Mjroots (talk) 18:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Aside from naming convention issues and excessive and unnecessary categorization of the images, I can't see that much wrong with the article or images. I'm going to consider adding categories that Doncram suggested, if they haven't been added already. -User:DanTD (talk) 19:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

I Got to the water wheel, Water Mill (Water Mill, New York) needs a review... CaptJayRuffins (talk) 15:15, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

QHD
I could use some help cleaning up Quogue Historic District CaptJayRuffins (talk) 01:37, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I added a few descriptions to your gallery. -User:DanTD (talk) 20:47, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

added content
Quogue Historic District, Hayground Windmill , United States Post Office (Westhampton Beach, New York), Windmill at Water Mill, John Lyon Gardiner Mill Cottage and a wiki voyage , https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Westhampton_Beach Thanks to all the editors who pitched in to help with these sept NRHP projects!CaptJayRuffins (talk) 01:54, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

NRHP
The Weeping Beech was just added as completed, it was a stub under Kingsland Homestead. Should it have a NRHP infobox? CaptJayRuffins (talk) 00:32, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:Living Landmarks has been nominated for discussion
Category:Living Landmarks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 17:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, CaptJayRuffins, and welcome to Women in Red. You might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know is you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 14:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Assistant professors
I must profess a little concern about creating articles on assistant professors. There are 2 to 6 million professors in the world, most of whom are of little note. The few articles on assistant profs that I have seen survive AfD are about people who were notable novelists, poets, musicians, artists, etc first, then obtained a position at a university. Abductive (reasoning) 21:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Actually, the article is about a Social worker who speaks a (dead) language due to the genocide perpetrated on her people by colonizers. That she is involved in a renaissance of the language, and had achieved the highest level of education, a doctorate in anthropology, to be able to overcome the obstacles placed on her people, make me have to say, please,


 * . CaptJayRuffins (talk) 00:05, 6 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Sure, sure, but that doesn't necessarily make a person notable. I'm just letting you know that in the absence of secondary sources, assistant professors are not notable, should you consider making another article on one. Abductive  (reasoning) 01:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

I was thinking of creating a list of Guggenheim Fellows names as the recipents are automatically notable as per WP:NACADEMIC Criteria #2. Some, I'm sure, are very fine assistant professors... CaptJayRuffins (talk) 05:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry to be a bother, Alberta Odell Jones was brought to my attention by a Professor who is also an Attorney, who I'm sure is a very fine person. But is she notable? ... CaptJayRuffins (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 101st Precinct Police Station


A tag has been placed on 101st Precinct Police Station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://s-media.nyc.gov/agencies/lpc/lp/2610.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Your addition to Institutional racism has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. 💵Money💵emoji💵 💸 16:19, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April 2019
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:SSSB, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png located above the edit window.

''This is necessary even if you are just leaving a header. Thanks, '' SSSB (talk) 11:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

June events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Black Firefighters Association


The article Black Firefighters Association has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This is a local association (San Francisco Black Firefighters Association) affiliated to an international one. I think it is not notable per WP:BRANCH."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tacyarg (talk) 18:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Pages with DEFAULTSORT conflicts
Hello there. One or more of your pages have DEFAULTSORT conflicts ([ search]) Please either in the affected pages. Thank you. – Ase1este t@lkc0ntribs 15:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * User:CaptJayRuffins/sandbox
 * DEFAULTSORTs (if your page is a draft consisting of multiple subjects); or
 * remove redundant DEFAULTSORTs (if your page is a draft with multiple DEFAULTSORTs); or
 * remove all DEFAULTSORTs (otherwise)


 * Done. Thanks CaptJayRuffins (talk) 12:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)*****

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Phillips
I removed personal non-encyclopedic material from infobox, and the see alsos for more notable people in her general field. I note, btw, that "vice-dean" is a minor administrative position that does not imply notability, academic or otherwise.

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, CaptJayRuffins

Thank you for creating Carl G. Holmes.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---  DOOMSDAYER 520</b> (Talk&#124;Contribs) 14:11, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

I addressed your concerns with the section. Thanks for the heads up.CaptJayRuffins (talk) 10:49, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of William T. Kane for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William T. Kane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/William T. Kane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JBL (talk) 12:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sag Harbor Hills, Azurest, and Ninevah Beach Subdivisions Historic District


A tag has been placed on Category:Sag Harbor Hills, Azurest, and Ninevah Beach Subdivisions Historic District requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 19:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daisy Tapley


A tag has been placed on Daisy Tapley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.sagharborpartnership.org/permanent-residents-of-oakland-cemetery.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daisy Tapley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BLM. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

External URLs
External URLs should only be in an External links section, never in the body of an article (except within a section). Schazjmd  (talk)  00:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Renee V. H. Simons for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Renee V. H. Simons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Renee V. H. Simons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 01:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Contested The article has been improved for notability. CaptJayRuffins (talk) 22:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Refs
Hi, I've done some cleanup on Renee V. H. Simons. You might find User:Nick Moyes/Easier Referencing for Beginners helpful. (Also, I removed the bit about Chase being a great place to work; I know you're trying to save the article, but irrelevant puffery isn't the way to go.) Happy editing! Schazjmd  (talk)  01:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC) Thanks, always glad to have helping hands in the kitchen, the throw everything out 'caus we have no more room folks can stay away! CaptJayRuffins (talk) 02:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Jennifer Jones Austin
I appreciate your "Thanks", but thank you for taking up the #1day1woman 2020 challenge and adding JJA's article in the first place. Perfect example of the type of person who deserves an article and might otherwise have been missed. No response needed - not trying to to create a chain of entries here, just wanted to say my thanks to you. Jmg38 (talk) 04:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Red Hook Lane Arresick


The article Red Hook Lane Arresick has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Although this claims to be an article about 'Red Hook Lane Arresick', a 'revolutionary war burial ground in Red Hook, Brooklyn', about 80% or more if offtopic, and the only reference to the supposed burial ground is the assertion that he ground was discovered and used as the hook for a heritage trail. We learn, roughly, absolutely zero about the supposed burial ground. This does not look salvageable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tagishsimon (talk) 19:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Red Hook Lane Arresick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Hook Lane Arresick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Red Hook Lane Arresick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tagishsimon (talk) 09:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Women in Africa contest
Hi CaptJayRuffins! Thanks for signing up for the Women in Africa contest. The entries for the contest must be newly-created articles 160 words or 1,000 characters of running text. Your interesting article on Phila Portia Ndwandwe was created in 2019 so isn't eligible for this contest. Hope you keep writing! Best, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 16:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Remsen Cemetery
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revolutionary War Heritage Trail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prospect Park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Commons woes
I saw your 2018 note on your talk page. Did anyone ever give you a link to c:Commons:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS? I understand that if you go through their e-mail system, they'll make a note that you're you, etc., and you'll end up with fewer problems (and a quick un-delete process if someone makes a mistake). WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Thanks, I'll look into that... CaptJayRuffins (talk) 13:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Deborah Archer
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Sources for notable
This edit to the article for Jamaica, Queens added Debra Wilson as a notable, with no source. Her article places her as being from Ozone Park, Queens and makes no mention of Jamaica. If you have a source for as being from Jamaica, why didn't you add the source? If you don't have a source connecting her to Jamaica, why did you add her as a notable? Alansohn (talk) 20:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Jamaica is below the grand Central, Flushing is to the north. From Wikipedia.. Jamaica is a middle-class neighborhood in the New York City borough of Queens. It is mainly composed of a large commercial and retail area, though part of the neighborhood is also residential. Jamaica is home to large African American and Caribbean populations. Jamaica is bordered by Hollis to the east; St. Albans, Springfield Gardens, Rochdale Village to the southeast; South Jamaica to the south; Richmond Hill and South Ozone Park to the west; Briarwood to the northwest; and Kew Gardens Hills, Jamaica Hills, and Jamaica Estates to the north.CaptJayRuffins (talk) 20:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Just one more month left of Women in Red's Women in Africa contest
Thanks for your fantastic contributions to Women in Red's Women in Africa contest. An update, now that we're two months in: over 100 articles have been created in January and February! Please help make the final month of the contest a success too :) Dsp13 (talk) 14:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:Our Lady of Częstochowa churches in the United States has been nominated for deletion
Category:Our Lady of Częstochowa churches in the United States has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Wikimedia NYC
Hi. As I was browsing some NYC Commons categories, I noticed some of your pictures and see that you frequently contribute to NYC topics. Maybe someone has told you about this in the past, but FYI there is an active non-profit based in NYC which holds regular events related to Wikipedia/Wikmedia projects: Wikimedia New York City. We have monthly events called WikiWednesdays which are open to the public. They typically involve a mix of presentations and discussions about various topics. It's very informal, and since last spring they've been online (like everything else). Information about this month's meeting is here, if you're interested: Meetup/NYC/April 2021. And you can always find out about upcoming events (WikiWednesdays but also topic-specific events) at WP:WMNYC. &mdash; Rhododendrites  <sup style="font-size:80%;">talk \\ 22:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for New York and Long Island Coignet Stone Company Building
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Millie tunnell
Hello CaptJayRuffins,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Millie tunnell for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Millie Tunnel


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Millie Tunnel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 17:13, 3 July 2021 (UTC)


 * My bad, I should have moved it after a spelling error in the title, but I didn't know if anyone had interacted with it, fubbing it 2x was all me. The corrected article is here... Millie Tunnell...CaptJayRuffins (talk) 17:20, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons at Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Polish National Catholic Church of The Holy Cross (Brooklyn) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Polish National Catholic Church of The Holy Cross (Brooklyn), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 13:25, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of New York State Historic Markers in Suffolk County, New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brentwood.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Battle of Fort Washington
 * added a link pointing to Bennett Park
 * Margaret Corbin
 * added a link pointing to Bennett Park

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Concern regarding Draft:Polish National Catholic Church of The Holy Cross (Brooklyn)
Hello, CaptJayRuffins. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Polish National Catholic Church of The Holy Cross (Brooklyn), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your draft article, Draft:Polish National Catholic Church of The Holy Cross (Brooklyn)


Hello, CaptJayRuffins. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Polish National Catholic Church of The Holy Cross".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 16:49, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Polish National Catholic Church of The Holy Cross (Brooklyn) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polish National Catholic Church of The Holy Cross (Brooklyn) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Polish National Catholic Church of The Holy Cross (Brooklyn) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2023
An article you recently created, Draft:Good Ground Windmill, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. <span style="background:#36c;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">Silikonz <span style="background:#eaecf0;padding:2px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">💬 20:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Good Ground Windmill was returned to mainspace CaptJayRuffins (talk) 16:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, CaptJayRuffins. Thank you for your work on Southampton/Shinnecock (Cottage) Windmill. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   15:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)


 * aces. Thanks CaptJayRuffins (talk) 20:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks, about as close to a barnstar after practicing on 131 articles. Working on getting better...

CaptJayRuffins (talk) 20:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Orient Windmills, NY moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Orient Windmills, NY. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 05:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)


 * the article Orient Windmills, NY was re-submitted for review CaptJayRuffins (talk) 23:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Category:Cutchogue (town), New York has been nominated for merging
Category:Cutchogue (town), New York has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 17:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Starin's Glen Island. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:54, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * its not a draft.. pardon, that was to remenber the link, thanks.CaptJayRuffins (talk) 20:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Your edit to Clarence L. Irving has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 20:24, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, CaptJayRuffins. Thank you for your work on Odd Fellows Windmill. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 19:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks in profusion. You have helped fix many of my articles and I am forever grateful. Hopefully some editor will spend some time and hopefully generate a G.A. From my humble beginnings. 20:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC) CaptJayRuffins (talk) 20:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I have been blocked from editing after a list I created for Tide mills of Long Island inadvertently on the last four entries introduced copy violations. There were about 30 entries formatted by a robot and many of the descriptions were from the wikis, which was then cited for non-attribution in the edit notes on each entry. I did miss the descriptions as needing rewrites - but question the level of condemnation that resulted over the lists creation. Like a John Oliver moment, the slamming of the red button and the 'WE'VE GOT YOU!!' as though someone has been waiting for just this error to have me pilloried for past indescretions that they had previously failed to convict me on, has me realizing that I have much built up resentment working against me with some admins. -- Following that, I pointed out that half of the flagged entries came from a public domain phamplet on the commons, begging the question, wtf? Every article I write within hours gets tagged with notes that never go away, even after cites are added for citation needed, ledes adjusted to clarify, and correction made to address the concerns. Did I step on some important parson on here by daring to write articles so I'd have a place to post pictures I took of NRHP sites? I have been rarely thanked for being a C class writer except by you and some others whom have helped me grow into an editor, so, help me out here. Whose got their panties in a knot over me? I don't have your tools and don't have any ax to grind, I do make mistakes but always seek to correct them. My eyesight is failing, I can't get around without a chair, my time grows near and I don't want to fight with anyone. I'm a Petrus Stuyvesant, 'the fight has gone out and he's retired to his bouwerie' -- should anyone ask, whatever happened to? CaptJayRuffins (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gideon Gibson Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orient Windmills, New York has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Orient Windmills, New York, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Orient_Windmills,_New_York help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Reading Beans (talk) 19:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, CaptJayRuffins. Thank you for your work on Dix Windmill. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   09:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind attention. Found 3 windmills on that jaunt to the North Fork, a windpump, a wind turbine and the Dix windmill and you completed my day with your review!CaptJayRuffins (talk) 11:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2023 at Women In Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Lianna Rebolledo


The article Lianna Rebolledo has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails GNG, mostly unsourced content"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GraziePrego (talk) 04:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Edit to the title of the Elaine de Kooning House Wikipedia page
Hi CaptJayRuffins,

Thank you for starting the Elaine de Kooning House Wikipedia page. I help manage the website and social media for the house, and we were really pleased when we discovered the page. We have one minor revision that we are hoping you can make.

Can you please change the title of the page from "The Elaine de Kooning house" to "Elaine de Kooning House"?

Thanks for your great work on the page! -Scott Marshall586 (talk) 18:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Joseph Deighton Gibson Jr.
This article appears to be a copy of a 2015 Medium post from inception. I have tagged it for a copyright investigation as such Mach61 (talk) 07:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

CS1 error on New Amsterdam's windmills
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page New Amsterdam's windmills, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20CaptJayRuffins&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1200473658 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_Amsterdam%27s_windmills&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1200473658%7CNew%20Amsterdam's%20windmills%5D%5D Ask for help])

Formality
In future, could you try to be more formal when writing articles? Details like these are really not appropriate.

Thanks. DS (talk) 00:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tide mills on Long Island, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Islip and Glen Cove.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at List of tide mills on Long Island. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. — Diannaa (talk) 23:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I have reviewed the violation and found the errors referenced to have been generated by my use of a code replication robot. The errors were let in as I used the link to format the entry, which only showed a synopsis of the code that was generated, hence I did not catch or read the text portion in full. In creating 'Tide mills on LI' I had only tried to generate a list, and immediately was confounded by edits like these: <Tag: Disambiguation links added, orphan tag &  and  tags>, which I took to responding to by adding tags- which then led to more info being left in the descriptions, and a from tile mills which I failed to attribute as from another wikipedia page. As the day led on I saw the list as a whole and did not catch the description copy vio before moving on to a new article. I am unable to find our previous interactions where you reference prior warnings, could you assist in my finding those as my talk page doesn't show any messages from you. I am still trying to appeal the block, but I am unable to post the appeal to my talk page beyond your block. The article I wrote after tide mills had no copy vio nor did the 15-20 articles before, it was an unforced error on my part and wont be repeated.  CaptJayRuffins (talk) 15:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The content was found here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e2/Long_Island_-_its_early_days_and_development_%28IA_longislanditsear00arm%29.pdf on the commons. CaptJayRuffins (talk) 16:06, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

CaptJayRuffins (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Firstly, you asked for a recap of the warnings you have received regarding copyright. I find eight warnings visible on your talk page. Here they are:
 * Message re: Vulcan Society FDNY (June 2014)
 * Message re: Stentorians (March 2015)
 * Message re: Increase Carpenter (August 2018)
 * Message re: 101st Precinct Police Station (March 2019)
 * Institutional racism (April 2019)
 * Daisy Tapley (October 2020)
 * Clarence L. Irving (March 2023)
 * Joseph Deighton Gibson Jr. (November 2023)

I will do some more investigating later when I get back from visiting my mother at the hospital. — Diannaa (talk) 17:50, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

I have restored content I removed that was copied from https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e2/Long_Island_-_its_early_days_and_development_%28IA_longislanditsear00arm%29.pdf, because that document is in the public domain. There's other material though, that was copied from other documents, that for copyright reasons cannot be restored. — Diannaa (talk) 21:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

We need to provide attribution when copying from public domain sources. This can be done by including the template as part of the citation. This is done so that our readers will be aware that prose was copied from the source, and that it's okay to copy verbatim. — Diannaa (talk) 21:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I don't need anything replaced, now that I can see the text I can fix the entries. I entered details to get the ownership and locations, it added the descriptions verbatim and I didn't catch it immediately. It wasn't intentional. I see the notes for the earlier errors, it's that they were not from you. I have no beef with removing the content and correcting, I just need to be made aware of it. There's no rush and can wait while you attend to family matters.. CaptJayRuffins (talk) 02:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Actually, I have checked my work and restored as much as possible. There's nothing further for me to investigate. There's still copyright content that I removed that is now hidden from you due to revision deletion of the edits in question. You won't be able to perform further fixes until you get unblocked, and that won't happen unless you take full responsibility for having added copyright content to Wikipedia (one of your posts above indicates that you believe it was the fault of a "code replication robot"?). Perhaps you could also explain why you did not notice over the course of two days of editing List of tide mills on Long Island that you had copypasted a bunch of prose from your sources into the article? Did you not even read the completed work and realize that you had not written it yourself? Also, I'm not sure why you think it matters who notified you about the previous violations of our copyright policy. (It does not.)In addition to the above questions, in order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. Please respond to the following basic questions about copyright and licensing, explaining in your own words:
 * What is copyright?
 * How is Wikipedia licenced?
 * Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
 * Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? What special measures would you need to take to do so?
 * How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?
 * Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. — Diannaa (talk) 03:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You, the editor that blocked me, in the notice I saw, stated unequivocatively that you notified me 7 times previously of copy vios. The other admins told what I did needed correction, you apparently, took great offense and in furious anger have vented and let me know you are the lord! (copy vio-some movie ...) & let me have a thunderbolt of enlightenment from the great god, and banned me to the netherworld to supplicate for forgiveness. Should I ever wish to be in your good graces then explain what is the five pillars of Wikipedia. I would - a few years ago,- get right back at the teacher who chastized me thusly and it's probably why I only have a high school diploma to show for such reactions. Banned to special ed for talking back, forever marked as unteachable. As I am now old and feeble, going blind in one eye and hobbled to a wheelchair with bum feet and unsteady left leg, you ask why I didn't see what the robot was doing. --Becuz' I did not see it is the only answer I can give. (-: The robot...
 * You
 * create code for The Roslyn Grist Mill which is located along Old Northern Boulevard in Roslyn, New York, United States. It was built sometime before the mid-18th century and is one of the few surviving Dutch colonial commercial frame buildings in the U.S. A gristmill has existed on the site since the first decade of the 18th century, when John Robeson built on it. He in turn sold it to Jeremiah Williams, who is believed to have built the current mill sometime between 1715 and 1741.[3] After another owner, it became the property of Hendrick Onderdonk, who already operated two paper mills in the settlement then known as Hempstead Harbor, in 1758.
 * wikitext
 * Roslyn, New York | Roslyn Grist Mill | Gristmill | Before mid-18th century (Exact date unknown) | The Roslyn Grist Mill is located along Old Northern Boulevard in Roslyn, New York, United States. It is one of the few surviving Dutch colonial commercial frame buildings in the U.S. A gristmill has existed on the site since the first decade of the 18th century when John Robeson built on it. He sold it to Jeremiah Williams, who is believed to have constructed the current mill sometime between 1715 and 1741. After Williams, the mill became the property of Hendrick Onderdonk in 1758. Onderdonk, who already operated two paper mills in the settlement then known as Hempstead Harbor, took over the operation of the Roslyn Grist Mill. |
 * What I saw on my screen:-
 * Roslyn, New York | Roslyn Grist Mill | Gristmill | Before mid-18th century (Exact date unknown) | The Roslyn Grist Mill is located along Old Northern Boulevard in Roslyn, New York, |
 * I tested it in my sandbox, and it worked! Now I don't have to do each individual entry, just give it the info and copy the wikitext. Clik the button, (copy wikitext). This repeated for 10 entries. The wiki lede for some is where I copied the info and where there was no wiki I searched for the mills on google. That how I found the Huntington tidemills -on the state government website. (yes, the copy vio-- only federal is public domain, not state or city pages) I copied this:
 * You
 * write the codes for the three tide mills in Huntington: 1752, Zophar Platt built a mill harnessing the power—and predictability—of the tides. The town’s first tide mill stood on the west shore of Huntington Harbor. Today’s Mill Dam Road runs along the embankment built to capture the tide. A second tide mill was built in Centerport. The third built further up Huntington Harbor still stands in Lloyd Harbor.
 * Here are the codes for the three tide mills in Huntington:
 * wikitext
 * Huntington Harbor | Zophar Platt's Tide Mill (1752) | Tide mill | 1752 | Zophar Platt built a tide mill harnessing the power—and predictability—of the tides. The town’s first tide mill stood on the west shore of Huntington Harbor. Today’s Mill Dam Road runs along the embankment built to capture the tide. | |- | Centerport | Centerport Tide Mill | Tide mill | Date unknown | A second tide mill was built in Centerport. | |- | Lloyd Harbor | Lloyd Harbor Tide Mill | Tide mill | Date unknown | The third tide mill built further up Huntington Harbor still stands in Lloyd Harbor. |
 * It looked good, it was progress, three at once, I posted it and moved on. Intrigued by the discovery of a new mill, one that was black owned, I entered this:-
 * write the code for the Crippen Mill: The Crippen House was originally constructed, circa 1658, as a grist mill. The mill remained in use through 1672, when it was closed due to concerns about the unhealthfulness of its mill pond. The mill building was sold, and around 1674 moved about 525 yards north to its current location close to the head of Huntington Harbor where it was converted to residential use. Preliminary analysis of the building confirms its construction as an industrial building rather than as a residence. Its heavy timber framing, dimensions, and sturdy proportions are reflective of industrial Dutch framing of the period. The building is a rare, early surviving example of this building type.
 * Here's the code for the Crippen Mill:
 * Huntington Harbor
 * Crippen Mill (circa 1658)
 * Grist mill
 * Circa 1658
 * The Crippen House was originally constructed around 1658 as a grist mill. It remained in use as a mill until 1672 when concerns about the unhealthfulness of its mill pond led to its closure. The mill building was then sold and moved about 525 yards north to its current location close to the head of Huntington Harbor around 1674, where it was converted to residential use. Preliminary analysis of the building confirms its construction as an industrial building rather than as a residence. Its heavy timber framing, dimensions, and sturdy proportions reflect industrial Dutch framing of the period. The building is a rare, early surviving example of this building type.
 * There is the text that you flagged. What I saw...
 * Huntington Harbor | Crippen Mill (circa 1658) | Grist mill | Circa 1658 | The Crippen House was originally constructed around 1658 as a grist mill. |
 * I posted the entry to the list, and went on to write the article for the Peter Crippen Mill House, which did not get flagged for any copy vios even though I used the same cited sources for that article. All in one afternoon.
 * No barnstar for 'good find'. No atta-boy for loong and tedious, pedantic writing.
 * Just a striking down in furious anger as I,, the GODDESS, lay my VENGEANCE UPON YOU!! (copy vio- movie ref).
 * Whats to fight for. I copied the entry and posted it. No malice intended, no vandalism, just a correctable error. The article was long, the lede was terrible, but tired, I went and had lunch, not considering any ramification of my overt actions and napped the afternoon away, having discovered a new mill that might make the NRHP and a long island place for me to go take pictures of.
 * Now I'm tired. I don't want to copy and paste answers to what I think copyright is. Maybe later. My body is telling me to go do something by prodding me with pain. Will respond later. I will get screen shots for this later. Even after you flagged info found on wiki's and a public domain phamplet, you seem to have a bug for me. CaptJayRuffins (talk) 14:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm tired too. But I have to point out that I found quite a few geographic errors in this article. Maybe the source material also had these errors, but I felt the need to correct many of them. -User:DanTD (talk) 06:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * CaptJayRuffins (talk) 14:52, 28 March 2024 (UTC)DanTD I find the creation of the list to be adjunct to finding the mills and clarifying the locations. I feel the pressure to conform the list to article status (tags for lede msg, Refs) belies the purpose, a list to mark where they once stood, as many are removed from the landscape. I did get them from the commons article which Diannaa first removed as copy vio and subsequently replaced, so forgive if the locations are not proper in respect to Brooklyn, Queens, Nassau or Suffolk. Those would have been corrected in time. Thanks to, Marshall586 (talk), Reading Beans (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Doncram (talk), TheSandDoctor (talk),  Bfpage |leave a message, Ajpolino (talk), Epicgenius talk contribs‎, DanTD talk contribs‎, Rosiestep talk contribs‎, Rhododendrites talk, Transpoman talk contribs, Onel5969 talk contribs and all the other editors who helped my articles to be more readable and for pointing me the way forward. 190 articles, some fails, some wins. I think the last 30 or so articles showed me trying to not violate any copyrights or impede the function or purpose of 4.0 usage rights (CC BY-SA) to the Wikimedia mission and Barnstars to all who helped me to find the way. By the way, 780mil views on Google maps as I visit and photograph every site I've added to wikipedia. CaptJayRuffins (talk) 14:52, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I have taken responsibility for the errors in the tide mills list and you have not released my account, which amounts to punishment. I did not intentionally copy the text and was using the robot to ease creating the list for the first time. You may have been watching for this type of thing as mere hours elasped before you immediately blocked my account, falsely claiming you notified me 7 times over the last 10 years for such conduct. The article I wrote the very same day from the same research has been reviewed, and no violation was reported in the article Peter Crippen Mill House. You also reversed course when informed that the research was from a 1914 phamphlet found on the commons and restored much of the content to the list. You have punished me for 60 plus days for a error I did not catch in creating the list. This cannot be placed on any other editor as you are the instigator of this punishment. I have gotten better, at identifying copyright violations and think this punishment was excessive. I took responsibility 3 months ago, but let me repeat:  "Unintentioned error on my part, the pamphlet that I used to locate the tide mill was published in 1914, which I dated as beyond the 70 years as allowed. The other error was using the lede from the 'Tide mills' article as it was preceded by a disambigulation link for clarif, which was later removed by another editor. I've re-read the Wikipedia:Copyrights and may have violated Wikipedia policy by uploading copyrighted material without authorization, specifically not attributing text to that page in the edit notes. CaptJayRuffins (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2024 (UTC)" Since you do not appear to be changing course, I wish to APPEAL for an intervention by our shared community and a different moderator.CaptJayRuffins (talk) 16:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I have taken responsibility for the errors in the tide mills list and you have not released my account, which amounts to punishment. I did not intentionally copy the text and was using the robot to ease creating the list for the first time. You may have been watching for this type of thing as mere hours elasped before you immediately blocked my account, falsely claiming you notified me 7 times over the last 10 years for such conduct. The article I wrote the very same day from the same research has been reviewed, and no violation was reported in the article Peter Crippen Mill House. You also reversed course when informed that the research was from a 1914 phamphlet found on the commons and restored much of the content to the list. You have punished me for 60 plus days for a error I did not catch in creating the list. This cannot be placed on any other editor as you are the instigator of this punishment. I have gotten better, at identifying copyright violations and think this punishment was excessive. I took responsibility 3 months ago, but let me repeat:  "Unintentioned error on my part, the pamphlet that I used to locate the tide mill was published in 1914, which I dated as beyond the 70 years as allowed. The other error was using the lede from the 'Tide mills' article as it was preceded by a disambigulation link for clarif, which was later removed by another editor. I've re-read the Wikipedia:Copyrights and may have violated Wikipedia policy by uploading copyrighted material without authorization, specifically not attributing text to that page in the edit notes. CaptJayRuffins (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2024 (UTC)" Since you do not appear to be changing course, I wish to APPEAL for an intervention by our shared community and a different moderator.CaptJayRuffins (talk) 16:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, CaptJayRuffins. Thank you for your work on Sidney August Anthony Miller Jr.. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

<b style="color: #0000cc;">North8000</b> (talk) 20:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Aquebogue Windmill
Hello, CaptJayRuffins

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dclemens1971, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Aquebogue Windmill, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:


 * 1) Edit the page
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click the  button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And remember to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I removed the proposed deletion; I do not think the deletion is uncontroversal. WP:AFD would be more appropriate. BTW, CaptJayRuffins is currently blocked due to copyvios. --Cyfal (talk) 20:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Aquebogue Windmill
Hello CaptJayRuffins, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Aquebogue Windmill, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Aquebogue Windmill.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)