User talk:Captain611611611

May 2017
Hello, I'm Acroterion. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sally Kohn have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at November 2015 Paris attacks, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Photograph of Ian Carter (IDubbbzTV) from Content Cop- Leafy.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Photograph of Ian Carter (IDubbbzTV) from Content Cop- Leafy.png
Thanks for uploading File:Photograph of Ian Carter (IDubbbzTV) from Content Cop- Leafy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Photograph of Ian Carter (IDubbbzTV) from Content Cop- Leafy.png
Thanks for uploading File:Photograph of Ian Carter (IDubbbzTV) from Content Cop- Leafy.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 02:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Photograph of Ian Carter (IDubbbzTV) from Content Cop- Leafy.png
Thanks for uploading File:Photograph of Ian Carter (IDubbbzTV) from Content Cop- Leafy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

from your userpage because Holy4d mis-posted
Page of conversation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Los_Angeles_riots

Hi, I am curious why you reverted the image back from the original? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holy4d (talk • contribs) 01:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

There should probably be a consensus before we change the main image of this page Lion76768 (talk) 16:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

"Lion76768" Why do you keep changing the original main image for this wikipedia article that displayed the Army National guard and placing an image of the marine corps in its place?

Everyone knows it was the Army national guard that did all the work in this effort "not the marine corps" it's actually been a case of stealing the spotlight from the Army. Cant you let the Army have just some credit for all the hard work they performed? Below is an article that expresses the very instance I am referring to. What you are doing appears biased? Why is a consensus needed to revert the page back to what it was?

https://www.wearethemighty.com/history/marines-la-riots — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holy4d (talk • contribs) 03:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

You need to be more careful when editing topics relating to politics
Going through your edits, it's pretty easy to find examples of you mainstreaming far-right politics (whether accidental or otherwise):
 * Removing freedom of speech, press, religion, and markets from Liberalism strongly favors the relatively modern right-wing American strawman of "liberalism" over how academics would describe the philosophy globally and historically (i.e. how articles should be written)
 * Labeling a group that's part of the American left as "far-left" doesn't make sense when the American left is barely left of center in the grand scheme of things
 * Labeling someone described as far-right and even alt-right as merely "right-wing" and "conservative" is pretty blatant mainstreaming (especially in light of your other edits)
 * Labeling source that don't approve of a comment by Trump as "left-wing" (as if the right and even the center can only agree with him, nevermind Never Trump movement and Trump's own pick for Secretary of Defense)
 * Requesting a citation for the Groypers being being white supremacists when the article is full of references that point out that they're white nationalists (which is just a euphemism for white supremacists in an attempt to present themselves as somehow better simply because they're wearing polo shirts instead of pointed hoods and saying "Googles" instead of the N-word).

Also, it'd be easier to assume good faith from requesting a citation for Nick Fuentes being a white nationalist when there were already sources in the article if you hadn't blatantly acknowledged elsewhere just a few hours later that Fuentes is a white nationalist.

Those edits really don't make it look good when you request a citation for Karl Schwarzschild being Jewish and replace Jewish with German at that article and Martin Schwarzschild. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification
Ian.thomson (talk) 22:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Karen Gillan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Elizium23 (talk) 04:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
–– FormalDude  talk  02:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)