User talk:CaptainVideo890

Hello, CaptainVideo890, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! — Wi ki sc ie nt  — 08:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Eternity and its discontents...
I just wanted to let you know that I undid your recent addition of apeirophobia to the Eternity article as per Wikipedia's "trivia" policy. It's an interesting word, but... well, just about every wikipedia article could have a "See also" -phobia, -philia, -ology, etc, etc, right? Which just seems a bit excessive. If you really, really want to include it in the Eternity article, though, why don't you make your case for doing so at Talk:Eternity?

Anyway, I hope you enjoy editing at wikipedia, and continue doing so! Let me know if you have any questions or if I can help out in any way!

--— Wi ki sc ie nt  — 08:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Carolina girls
I have nominated Carolina girls, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Carolina girls. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Sam Blab 23:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)   Sam  Blab 23:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

District 9
A tag has been placed on District 9, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 02:27, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Shooting clubs
A tag has been placed on Shooting clubs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 23:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Xiphoid knife


The article Xiphoid knife has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * sounds like a WP:NEOLOGISM. No indication of notability. "Xiphoid knife" at google has 10 hits - only 3 relevant hits. One to the manufacturer referenced, one to a search engine and one to a download page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 19:01, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Avery Watts
Another editor has made major changes to the article you created back on September. Looking back at your revision, it does not contain any references and it makes vague claims towards establishing his notability. Would you be able to provide additional references and material to establish his notability? For example a discography. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)