User talk:CaptainZond

Vostochny Cosmodrome location
Hi, and thanks for your addition. But where did you get this info? I tried to find it myself but I was unsuccessful. Offliner (talk) 01:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It comes from interpretation of a photo of a poster display shown at MAKS 2009, reproduced with translation here: CaptainZond (talk) 19:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ReInvention (album) (September 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ReInvention (album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ReInvention (album), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ReInvention_(album) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SportingFlyer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ReInvention_(album) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer  talk  03:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ReInvention (album) (November 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ReInvention (album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ReInvention (album), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ReInvention_(album) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ReInvention_(album) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 13:38, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:ReInvention (album)


Hello, CaptainZond. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ReInvention".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Table of productions for The Wednesday Play and Play for Today
Thank you for adding the tables of productions to The Wednesday Play and Play for Today (assuming that was also you) – significant improvements. I have added anchors to both tables, to enable links to be created to individual plays. These are useful:
 * 1) to enable internal links within the article as I have done  (you may wish to create such links from your DVD lists),
 * 2) to enable direct links from other articles (eg articles on the participants),
 * 3) and to create or improve redirect pages.

You created sortable tables, which I like, but more work is needed to make the sorting work as readers might expect:
 * 1) dates currently sort on day of the month, then month alphanumerically (1 Apr, 1 Aug, 1 Dec, 1 Feb, ... 2 Apr) – to make them sort chronologically wrap each date in the dts template, eg   which outputs 1-Apr-2020
 * 2) names of people currently sort alphabetically on first name – to make them sort by surname wrap each name in the sortname template, eg   By default this template will create a link, which is good and repeating links in tables is allowed and helpful to readers who may view rows in any order through sorting or by accessing a row through a link to its anchor. You may sometimes need the   or   third parameter, eg   or
 * 3) titles will sort OK except those starting “A”, “An” or “The” which can be made to sort conventionally by using the sortname template just on these titles, eg   The last example above, including the complete link as the third parameter, is occasionally needed, but for   I would create a Redirect page for the alternative name, so create a page “The After Dinner Joke” containing  then just use.
 * 4) for columns where sorting won’t do anything useful, use   in the heading for that column, eg
 * 5) your season title in the date column will break date sorting of that row, but that could be overcome using   first. However, I would make the season title it’s own row with   across the whole table and a background colour to highlight it. I think they’ll then sort to bottom (but I could be wrong about that).

Yesterday, I added links to the John Le Mesurier article to his Wednesday plays but my edit was reverted by someone who said “”. I disagree, but as you can see from a draft article I’m creating I add synopsis and a reference to each play. I recently experimented with an alternative format in my sandbox. Feel free to copy anything from these that appeal to you.

I see, who over the years has made constructive improvements to my articles, has edited your tables – so I’m alerting him in case he wants to add to, disagree with, or even implement my suggestions.

Happy editing!

Jim Craigie (talk) 19:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Capitalisation of play titles
I had assumed that your unconventional capitalisation of play titles was following the BBC′s in Radio Times, until I came across this for an article that I’m currently updating BBC – Radio Times – Play for Today: Just a Boys' Game

When I created the id parameters I copied your capitalisation, but unfortunately anchors are case-sensitive, so when today I expected Play for Today to work I found it didn’t, because at least in this case your capitalisation isn’t following that in Radio Times. Is there a reason for that?

Jim Craigie (talk) 03:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

I have made no special check of titles but my order of preference would be to refer first to the as-transmitted title caption. If (as was often the case) it was only in upper case then I would refer to the first RT listing. CaptainZond (talk) 20:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

I have now corrected a few titles based on the on-screen captions of productions seen in the 2020 Drama Out Of A Crisis documentary. CaptainZond (talk) 14:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Use of Episode table
Please see discussion Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Jim Craigie (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks - indeed, rather than apply retrospectively an artificial, post-hoc template structure & numbering, I'm inclined to try to find the BBC production codes (A,B,C,...AA,BB,CC,...AAA,BBB,CCC,...4A,4B,4C, etc., if it was like Doctor Who) and thus distinguish visually somehow between the 'native' PfT productions and seasons, and presentations of productions 'flown in' from the BBC or elsewhere. CaptainZond (talk) 20:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Russian Library-Bibliographical Classification moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Russian Library-Bibliographical Classification, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 14:26, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russian Library-Bibliographical Classification (December 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chicdat was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Russian Library-Bibliographical Classification and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Russian Library-Bibliographical Classification, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Russian_Library-Bibliographical_Classification Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chicdat&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Russian_Library-Bibliographical_Classification reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 13:05, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Russian Library-Bibliographical Classification
Hello, CaptainZond. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Russian Library-Bibliographical Classification, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)