User talk:Captain frakas

European Parliament election, 2014
Hello Captain, thanks for contributing to ongoing updates of this page. I see that you added the 2013 apportionment of seats between 2009 and 2014 counts. I assume that you wanted the seat differences in this table to match the seat differences in the large results table. However I think the intent of the apportionment table was to show the changes in seats since the last election in 2009. Otherwise we might as well add the changes that occurred in 2011, but that's fully covered in the main article about the apportionment. May I suggest to revert this change and keep the table simple? — JFG talk 02:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi JFG, yes, certainly, please revert if you think it is better. Indeed I wanted the seat differences in this table match those of the other table. Thanks you for asking, that's very courteous of you. Regards Captain frakas (talk) 02:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:2014 EP result by constituencies.svg
Thanks for uploading File:2014 EP result by constituencies.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 02:45, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

French numerals

 * OK. I think the first thing I have to do is to apologise for many things. But even if l'Académie Française recommend to use "onze cents", etc. it is not the option that we use commonly. When we talk about any number, we use "mille cent" or "mille deux cents"... more than the other, for counting distances, number of pages, number of people, and quite everything in fact. Of course, the way by hundreds is also used but mostly in dates. The only problem is that I don't really know how to prove it. I just try to help to improve the articles about French because it is my mother tongue and that I know how we talk. Come in France and you'll see I'm right. The decisions of L'Académie Française aren't always respected. (I'm going to make another change, but about the plural mark of vingt and cent, and with a proof this time.)Yoyo360 (talk) 18:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Yoyo :) I think that you should ideally copy your message here: Talk:French_language ;) I'll answer you there and other peoples may contribute and help us to find sources (even if I have the impression that few people look at the talk page). We may perhaps found frequencies of use in books. What I read in the French Academy page is that this is not a recommendation but an observation of use. They say Cependant, dans l’usage courant, on dit plutôt onze cents, douze cents, etc. : onze cents francs, seize cents euros, the sole recommendation is to favour the other way in written language: tandis que dans la langue écrite, et notamment dans un texte juridique, administratif ou scientifique, on préférera les formes : mille cent, mille deux cents, etc.. Before you've put your source, yesterday, my thought was that it was a recommendation, but it seem it isn't the case. As I've said in the talk page, I suppose it may be a generational/social/educational difference of use [I presume generational]. The problem is that we can't wrote it this way as it would be seen as original research Best Regards Captain frakas (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2014 (UTC) PS: I am also a native French speaker.


 * I answered on the talk page of the article.Yoyo360 (talk) 19:34, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=612746788 your edit] to European Parliament election, 2014 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * (Spain)|PP]]) 1 (CpE)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614640764 your edit] to European Parliament election, 2014 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:47, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * s Party]], Martin Schulz for the Party of European Socialists, Guy Verhofstadt for the [Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe], Ska Keller and José Bové jointly for the [[

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)