User talk:Carabinieri/Archive3

'''Please don't edit this page. This is an archive. To leave me a message click here'''

Germany Project
You're right about the huge scope of any such project. But the currently reactivated Prussia project will handle the articles related to old Prussia. Similar specialized work groups and/or task forces could easily be created within the project as well. But, given the significance of Germany in the current world, and in the old world, there does seem to be a need for some sort of project keeping track of the German content on wikipedia. It would also be the logical place/group to keep up the Portal:Germany and any other related portals. Lastly, like the WikiProject Australia, WikiProject Military history, and WikiProject Biography, it could provide some support functions (like assessment, referencing, review, etc.), for all of the various allied projects. Those were the intentions of creating the new project, anyway. And the old one just got deleted, so I hoped that we might try to make the potential successor (and possibly succeeding failure, as well) one with a better chance of amounting to something. Badbilltucker 18:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank You for information about the project. (Terot 14:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC))

GDR project
I am uncertain about the best way to go on with this. I think a GDR project could be nice, reasonably-sized and focussed, with a chance at actually completing some tasks (unlike the Germany project, which is a bit large). Anyway, you should check out my draft at User:Kusma/WikiProject German Democratic Republic before I submit it to the proposals page. Kusma (討論) 18:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You're probably right and if we can get the infrastructure for a Germany project going, we can do without a separate GDR project and just organize the relevant things on subpages of the Germany project. More important than talking about it is probably to do some actual work on the project ;-) We could ask some of the organizers of other large-scale WikiProjects or the WikiProject Council for help, though (probably better than asking people knowledgeable about the subject matter, as this is a question of organization and management, not one of content). Kusma (討論) 19:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Al-Manar
Thanks for your recent work on this page!Hypnosadist 21:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

stubs
Thanks for letting me know. btw on that page I found Nuremberg U-Bahn stub but before adding that to the list I was wondering if the templatelist on the project should go so deep into detail or if it just stay Germany wide? Agathoclea 05:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Annaberdy Kakabaev
Hi, I saw your edit to Annaberdy Kakabaev. Thanks for adding the references section, I had forgotten to do so. Regards, KazakhPol 22:39, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Caribbean-trade-union-stub
Sure, no problem. --Bookandcoffee 15:14, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Opps! I guess I should've had some coffee before checking my watchlist this morning! Thanks for catching my ==== error. Didn't mean to stub you. :) --Bookandcoffee 15:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany templates
Full well intend to do not create any further templates. Just wanted to let you know that I actually didn't create any of the existing ones either. They were all copied from the previous Germany project page. It hadn't occurred to me to verify that they were all approved, and you have my sincerest apologies for having included any which might not have been. If you so desire, please feel free to delete those which haven't yet been approved, and simply indicate on the talk page that such templates have not been approved. Thank you. Badbilltucker 18:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

The project merge with The Project
I'm leaving this note because you've edited on the first page above. I made a new page on the same topic, not realizing the first one existed. Are you interested in helping to merge the pages? Elizmr 02:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

AWB edit rate
You are editing a bit fast :-) (more than 2-3/minute probably already counts as too much). You should probably get a bot flag so you can edit at this rate, and it will have the additional benefit of not cluttering up your own contributions list that much. Happy tagging, Kusma (討論) 15:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Just making sure no trigger-happy admin blocks you for running an unapproved bot :-) Kusma (討論) 16:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

"class", not "Class"
I noted many of the articles you graded were worded as "Class={whatever}". Unfortunately, the computer only recognizes "class=" for these purposes. Just a reminder for the next time. Badbilltucker 18:42, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

re Breisach thanks
I appreciate your noting my editing. As I say on my User Page, I try not to interfere with the author's writing, and I assume—always a questionable thing to do—that I didn't. I just hope to improve a bit. I took it out of copyedit because it's been some time since I worked on it, and there have been no additions. I like the article. Thanks for writing it. And, your user page is a work of art. Outlook 00:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

My plugin
Hi,

I see from the log pages that you're using my plugin. A couple of issues: Hope that helps. --kingboyk 15:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It would seem that the date links are incorrect, presumably because your Windows settings aren't English. I'll have to fix that.
 * It looks from the log like you're having a few problems building your list. You have to convert all articles to talk pages first. Right click in the AWB file list and you'll see an option to do just that.

You've also got extra {{ marks in your template instance... --kingboyk 15:19, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006
The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Robert Ley
Thanks for rating my article on Robert Ley as "start" class. Would you care to suggest how it might be further improved? Would you care to have a go yourself at improving it? Would you care to direct me to some articles of yours of comparable quality, so that I can patronise your work in a reciprocal manner? Adam 02:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Deutsche Kommunistische Partei
Hi,

Re: your message on my talk page. The name of the party is not "German Communist Party" as you say, nor is it "Communist Party of Germany". It is "Deutsche Kommunistische Partei". I don't believe the English speaking Wikipedia reader cares about details on how this is translated. For the Wikipedia reader, what is needed, is clarity. This means that it should be clear that in the past 100 years, several German parties have called themselves "Kommunistische Partei" (communist party). If you have one article on the Communist Party of Germany and another on the German Communist Party, you create confusion, because it is only clear that there is a difference between the two to someone who has more background information, who already has read a bit on the topic. --Luxem 18:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Re: "Further, which name is used is very important. Because the "Communist Party of Germany" is banned but the "German Communist Party" is not." You're right. I did the move a bit too fast.
 * I think however that we should keep the references from both articles to each other and/or the disambiguation page, to help the not-so-informed reader. What do you think ? --Luxem 20:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

German Resistance
In relation to both this and Robert Ley, the boxes you are adding require you to state your reasons for giving the "rating" you do and to suggest how the article could be improved. In neither case have you done so. Without these comments, why should I take note of your rating, since I have no idea of your qualifications to issue it? Without comments, these boxes are not only useless, but an impertinence. Unless you add some comments soon I will delete the boxes. Adam 00:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The box says: "If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses." In neither case did you do so until prompted by me.
 * You criticised Robert Ley for having too little material in the introduction and now you criticise German Resistance for having too much. In neither case do I agree with you.
 * German Resistance is a thoroughly referenced article and doesn't need inline citations.
 * I agree that the statement concerning the level of public support for Hitler's regime needs to be referenced. You could have done it yourself, or you could have asked me to do it at the article's Talk page, or on my Talk page. Instead you posted a box (one more ugly box) that conveyed no useful information to me, forcing me to waste my time interrogating you to get this information from you. Adam 11:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

I didn't ask you for comments. I didn't ask you to get involved with these articles at all. I asked you what business you have assigning ratings to articles you have made no contribution to without giving any reasons or making any comment. There are two kinds of people at Wikipedia - those who write articles and those who make difficulties for those who write articles, most recently by festooning them with ugly, useless and vexatious boxes. I write articles, and I suggest you go and do likewise. Adam 08:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

WP Munich
 Hello,

You are invited to join WikiProject Munich!

There are a lot of things to do in this project. From creating new articles to finetuning articles into featured article status.

How can you help?
 * You can join a Task Force.
 * You can help comform Munich-related articles to Wikipedia Policy.
 * You can get free Munich-related images under GNU Free Documentation License.
 * You can create and edit of Munich-related articles.
 * You can do translations from German Wikipedia to English Wikipedia on Munich-related articles.
 * You can help do assessments of Munich-related articles.
 * You can help expand articles currently in the Stub-class and Start-class.
 * You can help reference articles.
 * Since original research is against Wikipedia policy, you can research topics to expand. This means you don't need to know anything about Munich.
 * You can help expand stubs and start-class articles and help finetune other articles into Featured article status.

A WikiProject of this nature is very broad. Munich has a rich history in sports, culture, politics along with many more topics. Feel free to help out in your area of interest.

If you want to check the project out you can click the link above. If you want to join the project, you can sign up here.

If you have any questions feel free to contact myself or any other member of the project.

 Kingjeff 00:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Germany related articles
I recently did stub sorting of the above articles and found that you have corrected many of the stub sorts made by me. Thank you for that. Corrections pertaining to struct, I do not agree with as religious buildings do belong to the struct-stub as per definition of structures and buildings. STTW (talk)  15:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Germany
Welcome,, to the WikiProject Germany! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Germany-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template WikiProject Germany. A few features that you might find helpful:
 * The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
 * Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to [ watchlist it].
 * We've developed a number of guidelines for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! Sorry for the late and spammy welcome, but I use every opportunity I see to advertise my Todo template, to which you are certainly welcome to contribute! Kusma (討論) 16:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006
The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Stub Sorting
Thanks for the heads-up, and sorry I haven't been very helpful up until now. :-) I'll get on the airports next time I'm bored and sorting.  --CComMack (t–c) 14:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject LGBT studies
Hello! I noticed that your userpage mentions that you are interested in LGBT issues. Would you be interested in joining WikiProject LGBT studies? The WikiProject's been a bit inactive recently and some of us are trying to get it going again. We'd love to have you on board! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 12:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Hermann Munk
I have submitted a few articles to the German Portal in the past. Someone else was looking for stubs. At times, I become distracted, though, by some other tasks. Thank you for the tip. I saw the list of German templates. Those templates help me, because I had been unaware of them until now. GhostofSuperslum 22:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

SFD notification
This message is to notify you that a stub template category that you created (pageant-bio-stub and ) is up for deletion at WP:SFD. Please join the discussion. Thanks. ~ Amalas rawr  =^_^=  17:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Airports aren't structures
See my comment in Talk:Norwood Memorial Airport. David 18:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Ukrainians
I don't have much in the way of sources on this question, and I am not very keen to get involved in another shitfight with eastern European nationalists. But I will have a look and see what I might be able to do to be helpful. PS can you translate "Marinemeuterei 1917" (see Max Reichpietsch) for me? Adam 23:27, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm afraid there is nothing to be done until Hillock65 gets himself banned, and the quicker the better. I am taking the article off my watchlist. Adam 06:11, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006
The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:23, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, History of the Jews in Malta, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 14:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

fact-tag; talk-page first, please
Hi Carabinieri. I will happily make any changes to the article that comes out of a consensus on the talk page. This is not to say that your proposal is not a good one, but the process of agreeing on its removal or finding a consensus-formulation will help improve the article. Buck  ets  ofg 19:32, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Your DYK nomination for Pterostilbene was successful
Thanks for your contributions! ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 11:52, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Your DYK nomination for Gordon Canfield was successful
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  21:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Karl Vollers
Dear Carabinieri,

thank you for your reminder in the future I will add some more articles on German scholars in humanities

Have a good new year!

Shabib01

Possibly unfree Image:Lionelmessi.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lionelmessi.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Muchness 22:06, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Baltia
Thank you very much for your nomination of my article. It's based on the French version, but the German version is a little more compete. I would appreciate it if you could sort of check it against the latter and add in any bits of relevant information I may have left out (or translated wrongly, since for the German version, I relied on a machine translation to pick out what I could). But if not, don't worry - I'll try to find someone else to help. Biruitorul 04:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Excellent. Thank you. Biruitorul 05:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Bernhard Sekles
I have added a "" template to the article Bernhard Sekles, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Oo7565 21:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Your DYK nomination for Prolecithophora was successful
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  00:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Your DYK nomination for Herman Baltia was successful
Thanks for your contributions! ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 03:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Sudetendeutsche Wissenschaftliche Sammlung
Warum hast Du ohne eine Wort unsere Artikel gelöscht? --Dr. Steller&amp;nbsp;&#91;&#91;User talk:Dr. Steller&#124;&lt;sup style=&quot;color:lightgreen&quot;&gt;e-mail&lt;/sup&gt;]] 19:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Das ist für Dich zurück:

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.


 * Ich habe den Artikel nicht gelöscht. Ich bin kein Administrator und kann daher deine Artikel gar nicht löschen. Bitte höre auf meine Veränderungen rückgängig zu machen das ist Vandalismus.


 * Das ist kein Vandalismus. Ich habe Recht in einem Artikel 2mal Revert machen. Aber dann wo ist unsere Artikel über die Sudetendeutsche Wiss. Sammlung?!
 * Machst du weiter, sorge ich dafür, dass du gespert wirst.--Carabinieri 19:42, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ist es nicht peinlich für Dich? Sag mir zuerst, was hast Du mit unserem Artikel gemacht? --Dr. Steller&amp;nbsp;&#91;&#91;User talk:Dr. Steller&#124;&lt;sup style=&quot;color:lightgreen&quot;&gt;e-mail&lt;/sup&gt;]] 19:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Ich habe mit dem Artikel nichts zu tun. Wie kommst du auf die Idee, dass ich diesen Artikel gelöscht habe? Ich habe gar nicht die technische Fähighkeit dazu.--Carabinieri 19:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Dann Entschuldigung. Kannst Du mir helfen zu suchen?
 * Das ist das letze Spur. --Dr. Steller&amp;nbsp;&#91;&#91;User talk:Dr. Steller&#124;&lt;sup style=&quot;color:lightgreen&quot;&gt;e-mail&lt;/sup&gt;]] 19:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Meine Begeisterung, das zu tun, wurde dadurch, dass du angefangen hast, meine Arbeit rückgängig zu machen, nicht gerade größer. Nochmals: Wie kommst du auf die Idee, dass ich diesen Artikel gelöscht habe?--Carabinieri 19:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Du hast mit diesem Artikel letzte mal gearbeitet. Kannst Du auf meinem Frage nicht antworten? --Dr. Steller&amp;nbsp;&#91;&#91;User talk:Dr. Steller&#124;&lt;sup style=&quot;color:lightgreen&quot;&gt;e-mail&lt;/sup&gt;]] 19:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Kannst Du mir helfen, einem Administrator English schreiben, das ich möchte ab sofort diese Artikel zurückstellen? Das war zu schnell, während 4 Stunden und 42 Minuten in der Nacht etwas entscheiden... Ich möchte protestieren. --Dr. Steller&amp;nbsp;&#91;&#91;User talk:Dr. Steller&#124;&lt;sup style=&quot;color:lightgreen&quot;&gt;e-mail&lt;/sup&gt;]] 20:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Danke sehr. Du hast Zeit, ich muss jetzt meine kleine Tochter kümmern. 8-) Bis Mittwoch: Lea   --Dr. Steller&amp;nbsp;&#91;&#91;User talk:Dr. Steller&#124;&lt;sup style=&quot;color:lightgreen&quot;&gt;e-mail&lt;/sup&gt;]] 20:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

stub sort
Thanks for pointing out, I will have a look at my edits. STTW (talk)  20:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Collections for Research into Sudeten German Minority
Hi, unfortunately that article clearly fails WP:CSD. In such case the deletion procedure is very quick. She can rewrite that article into english and put it back to wikipedia.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 00:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * An English only article was just speedied as re-post, which I don't think was right. OTOH it did not look very notable either. Agathoclea 00:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think it would have a chance to survive AfD even in english. But I agree second speediing was too fast.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 10:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

DYKs galore!
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  04:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Swedish stubs
Hello,

Thanks for keep Wikipedia well-organized.

I noticed you resorted the stubs I used in the Ekelundsbron article I just created. If you are certain your stubs are better suited for article, I should probably stub sort my other contributions listed in Geography of Stockholm. I'm not very confident with how stubs are dealt with, so, hoping to avoid causing unnecessary double-work, I hope you can guide me on this one.

/ Mats Halldin (talk) 16:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK nomination!
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  01:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Movimiento Nacionalista Tacuara
Thanks for your feedback. Maybe you'd like to have a look on the current version, see if it's not too complex or if there ain't got too much repetitions. The basics of the article has been its Spanish version, but I've now well read all its (often implicit) sources from which it has been written. Cheers! Tazmaniacs 19:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

PS: of course, you can expect some obscurity which comes from its subject itself: it is a strange group, and its members have had very different trajectories. Henceforth, one can't expect the article to be... too clear! Tazmaniacs 19:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Help with a translation
Hi, could you please check my translation in Punic military forces(I think it can be improved):

"The central problem (to understanding) the Carthaginian political institutions is their relation to military aspects"("Das zentrale Problem des karthagischen Staatslebens ist sein Verhältnis zum Militärwesen")

Greatings Wandalstouring 23:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * It's no article, It's from a book quoting another (old)book (see note in Punic military forces) Wandalstouring 17:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK!
Thank you for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  22:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)