User talk:Carbon0902

Sockpuppet investigation
Mr. Guye (talk) 01:17, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

I can't adopt you
I'm sorry, but I don't feel like I'm qualified to adopt any users yet.

If you still want to be adopted, ask, , , , or. ---Mr. Guye (talk) 23:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I do not do this either.  DGG ( talk ) 04:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Oh boy...Ok thank you anyway. I will seek "adoption" via the list you've taken the time out to generate for me. I do appreciate all of your help (editors & administrators) thus far for taking the time out of your busy schedules with helping me out in editing this article -- I really do appreciate this. I also know how time consuming it may be, being involved in correcting articles in general, and so respect everyone's professional input here. In addition, I too have also been busy at work with research (as we speak, while under the given time constraints) via trying to do my very best in making the appropriate necessary revisions, and correct updates needed based on the suggestion given to me. Thank you for having faith in me, and for giving me a chance (opportunity) here to rectify the problems here at hand, and Thanks again for all your help. --Carbon0902 (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Doc Mentillo
It is nice to see that you are working on Doc Mentillo. Unfortunately, all sources you have given are completely useless. A reference must point to something a web address, book, magazine and the likes in such a way that you can check the information given in the article with the given source. In all cases of your references, that is impossible. So please improve the references to the most exact descrdoiove been very niceg ption and destination (like full URL and page numbers). The Banner talk 16:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you
No problem sir. Thanks again for your help. Glad you noticed I'm still working painstakingly on this article. Incidentally, This project has proven to be more challenging than I ever anticipated. In fact, so much so that unfortunately I've become reunited again with my friend, Mr. "Jack Daniels." And now my bloody well has run dry! lol --Carbon0902 (talk) 17:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Take another bottle, as nomn of your sources is conform qualified as independent and reliable sources. Please read Reliable Sources what we really want as sources. The Banner talk 19:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Again
Thank you again for all your help, and for the heads up. I really do appreciate you trying to help me again. You've been very resourceful and informative. However, I'm still working on this section and have found some other articles in New York Times, and many many other sources (in other countries) for which I planned on citing, but don't have the time to work on this under the time constraints given, especially when I know this will eventually get deleted regardless of what sources or revisions I attempt. This is primarily the reason why I honestly never meant for this article to go live in the first place. This unfortunately was no other persons fault but my own. I take full responsibility for "messing up this persons article." And if I was ever going to consume an additional bottle, it would indeed be because of this reason. I don't enjoy screwing up somebodys article, especially when they never wanted the article to go live in the first place. For this I am ashamed. Additionally, so far I've found my experience thus far on wikipedia (in every way) to be far to time consuming, and no less than daunting and horrific. I only was trying to contribute, but perhaps Wikipedia is not for me. Thanks again everyone for your, help and God bless.

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Doc Mentillo. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.— cyberbot I Notify Online 06:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)