User talk:CarbonX

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  10:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello, I have additionally granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
 * Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
 * Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
 * Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
 * Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
 * Please read Help:Reverting and Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
 * You can test Rollback at New admin school/Rollback
 * You may wish to display the User wikipedia/rollback userbox and/or the Rollback top icon on your user page
 * Additionally, and most importantly, whenever you revert vandalism, you necessarily have to inform the editor whose edits you are reverting - whether the editor is an ip or a registered user, the reversion note is a must. I am writing this additional note as you seem to be a good editor who is crucially missing out on the reversion notes. Usage of automated tools like Huggle will help you in automating the note leaving process.
 * If you have any questions, please do let me know.

  Wifione    .......  Leave a message  10:25, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

What...
Now why did you cut most of the article "Luther Perkins" off??? It was all true, and nothing seemed to be incorrect in there! Do you hate him or what? That is not very nice to delete most of an article, and of all articles you chose Luther Perkins! That guy is my hero for god's sakes! Juicefani11 (talk) 23:38, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

what?
What are you talking about? They are good faith reverts. Don't come at me like I'm vandalising. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.32.47.2 (talk) 03:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Joshua Workman
Am I missing something, or is IP just doing a simple WP:CONTESTED? --CutOffTies (talk) 15:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The mistake may be mine, but my understanding is that's it's frowned upon to remove a speedy deletion tag without any explanation. I was actually intending to add something to his page to encourage him to add the  tag because I'm not sure the page meets the criteria for speedy deletion.  15:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The article had a wp:prod, not speedy deletion. --CutOffTies (talk) 15:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've gone and made a horrible mistake....  Maybe it's time to take a break...I thought that was a speedy delete tag.  Humbly, thanks for your help.  CarbonX (talk) 15:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, so you're going to restore the removal of the prod, correct? --CutOffTies (talk) 16:20, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  CarbonX (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Hum
Yeah You are correct that 1.) I am the main contributor to the article, 2.) it contains a lot of unsourced information, and 3.) it's difficult to source. I'd be happy to work with you on this one, but the best places to start are their allmusic biography, RCA's press bio, and an article in a 1998 issue of Rolling Stone (I have all of these links in a folder at home entitled HUM). If you want to start pruning it soon, I have no malice; thanks for e-mail me. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Wack Pack for deletion
The article Wack Pack is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wack Pack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 03:51, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Liberty and Tyranny.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Liberty and Tyranny.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

MiLB infobox
I'll make two versions of the infobox. Silvercoindinerman (talk) 17:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

The Wild Tchoupitoulas
Greetings, User:CarbonX! Please take a look at what I've written on Talk:The Wild Tchoupitoulas. I believe it would be great for the page to be developed and expanded. Perhaps you might list it for attention by the Wikipedia:Wiki Project New Orleans (which is tagged with a "possibly inactive" template...) or the WP:Louisiana. I only have web-search resources and these are inadequate to provide the historical and biographical content that might be available to you and your local/regional colleagues. (Editing in my fields of expertise, I do actual library look-ups and cite print media to which I'm personally subscribed.) -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 15:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jody McDonald, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages WIP and WTEL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

=Vandalism of Arnaudville Page=

You removed valuable information, (all of which is true might I add), from the Arnaudville, Louisiana page. As a resident of Arnaudville, I can say that I am deeply well-informed of who is our mayor, the last entry was erroneous, and submitted by former-mayor Richard, who is now little more than a town-hall assistant. I was there when Donald was elected, and for you to try to take away his lifetime of achievements is offensive to say the least.

Please undo your rollback, or submit proof that this imposter

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Allison-transmission-logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Allison-transmission-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)