User talk:Carhonda

Reversion of edits
Hello Carhonda, it's great to have you here at Wikipedia, and we hope you decide to stay and settle yourself, but your recent reversion of established users's edits on Albanians on Harry Potter fandom have been unproductive edits that can be classified as vandalism. In the case of Harry Potter fandom, a comment on the page clearly states "Please do not add a site here without first discussing it on Talk:Harry Potter fandom first." A user had added a web site without discussing it on the talk page, so it was reverted. You reverted that edit, placing the site back on the page, which I then reverted, so the web site is not present on the page anymore. Thank you. --Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 19:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I would think that, although T-dot and Deathphoenix didn't vote "agree", they certainly felt it should be included. However, if you like, I'll leave a neutral message at WP:Harry and ask users to voice their opinion. Best, Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 18:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)