User talk:CaribbeanSQNPFProfessor

Sinequanonology

Sinequanonology focuses on the nature of the processes that permeate our human existences and the universes* in general. Sinequanonology literally means the study of things that are “absolutely indispensable or essential”*. This discipline analyzes a variety of phenomena; it then produces the most fecund conclusions regarding their essential components. Sinequanonology can study a potentially unlimited array of examples and patterns*. One can also use sinequanonology to analyze various paradigms, as Thomas Kuhn defines paradigms in science, “in which a theoretical framework - called a paradigm - is accepted to be valid [and then] scientists…apply the paradigm in all sorts of new and novel circumstances to find out where the paradigm breaks down” (Baaquie http://srikant.org/core/phy11sep.html). In such cases of applying sinequanonology to scientific matters, one must conduct the sinequanonological investigation in a scientifically viable fashion. This requires careful and disciplined adherence to the scientific method and the tenets of sinequanonology’s methodology.

Paul Francis, a Williams College graduate, founded this discipline in 2005. He copyrighted it with the Library of Congress. Francis insists that he mainly deserves credit for having had a series of epiphanies--connected to rereading The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene--which led him to think more deeply about the most sine qua non aspects of Creation, and thus possible multiverses or an omniverse. Francis also drew inspiration from the work of Professor Melissa Barry--his favorite professor during his time at his alma mater.

More recently, Francis has applied sinequanonology--and a more practically oriented version dubbed sinequanoniatry--to significant success financially in investing (with over 100% ROI annually). An official offshoot of said Fintech applications have emerged in a method that Francis calls Pareto Principle PADF Optimization, which incorporates aspects of kaizen and value investing.

Sinequanonology
Sinequanonology focuses on the nature of the processes that permeate our human existences and the universes* in general. Sinequanonology literally means the study of things that are “absolutely indispensable or essential”*. This discipline analyzes a variety of phenomena; it then produces the most fecund conclusions regarding their essential components. Sinequanonology can study a potentially unlimited array of examples and patterns*. One can also use sinequanonology to analyze various paradigms, as Thomas Kuhn defines paradigms in science, “in which a theoretical framework - called a paradigm - is accepted to be valid [and then] scientists…apply the paradigm in all sorts of new and novel circumstances to find out where the paradigm breaks down” (Baaquie http://srikant.org/core/phy11sep.html). In such cases of applying sinequanonology to scientific matters, one must conduct the sinequanonological investigation in a scientifically viable fashion. This requires careful and disciplined adherence to the scientific method and the tenets of sinequanonology’s methodology.

Paul Francis, a Williams College graduate, founded this discipline in 2005. He copyrighted it with the Library of Congress. Francis insists that he mainly deserves credit for having had a series of epiphanies--connected to rereading The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory by Brian Greene--which led him to think more deeply about the most sine qua non aspects of Creation, and thus possible multiverses or an omniverse. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elegant_Universe). Francis also drew inspiration from the work of Professor Melissa Barry--his favorite professor during his time at his alma mater.

More recently, Francis has applied sinequanonology--and a more practically oriented version, dubbed sinequanoniatry--to significant success financially in investing (with over 100% ROI annually). An official offshoot of said Fintech applications have emerged in a method that Francis calls Pareto Principle PADF Optimization, which incorporates aspects of kaizen and value investing.

CaribbeanSQNPFProfessor (talk) 13:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

CaribbeanSQNPFProfessor (talk) 13:58, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Firefly. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Rebeca Linares have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. firefly ( t · c ) 14:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Carlo Rovelli. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:52, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Do you have a grasp of basic English syntax, vocabulary, and grammar? The sentence as written does not make sense. "Rovelli has exposedthe main idea of relational quantum mechanics in the popular book."

One does not say this in properly spoken or written English. Clearly it stems from the work of a non-native speaker. And I take great offense at your baseless accusation of vandalism. For your information, I am a native-English-speaking graduate of an Ivy League college in Massachusetts and of several prestigious preparatory schools in New York City. So, I should think that I have a firm grasp of my first language.

Finally, other than espoused, the only other acceptable word to replace exposed in said sentence would be expressed. CaribbeanSQNPFProfessor (talk) 08:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)