User talk:Cariboukid

Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! nsaum75 !Dígame¡ &lrm; 01:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Smart post logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Smart post logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Bloonstdfan360  (talk • contribs) 02:48, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=601544163 your edit] to Delta Connection destinations may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:06, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * |Seattle/Tacoma ||🇺🇸 (Washington (state)|Washington) ||SEA ||KSEA ||Seattle-Tacoma International Airport || || ||
 * |Spokane ||🇺🇸 (Washington (state)|Washington) ||GEG ||KGEG ||Spokane International Airport || || || || ||

Orphaned non-free image File:Caribou-coffee-logo-new.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Caribou-coffee-logo-new.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Caribou-coffee-logo-old.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Caribou-coffee-logo-old.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Cariboukid, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!

hi
You are the subject of a discussion at the Conflict of Interest noticeboard here. BlueSalix (talk) 03:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Cariboukid. I have responded at the COI section referred to above; i think it's fairly clear you are innocent of the violation BlueSalix is raising.  To assuage his worries, however, it might be reasonable to steer clear of Caribou Coffee, to make suggestions on the talk page (i'll be happy to keep it watchlisted, to help out if i can), or to ensure that nothing you add could conceivably be taken as promotional.  I hope you continue editing, Cheers, LindsayHello 17:34, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Lindsay, I welcome you to take a look at the recent sourcing correction I made to the my edit in question on Caribou Coffee, and advise if promotional. This updates the edit's references to online viewable sources, as the newspaper I previously referenced pulled its online archives resulting in my edit effectively becoming RS.

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Delta Connection destinations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santa Fe and Sault Ste. Marie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Sources for Destination Tables
In reference to my recent edit on Stewart International Airport, I see in the history that you have added the source for the Detroit route multiple times, with it being removed (by another frequent aviation editor). The most recent discussion about this occured in Archive 14 on WP:Airports and for the most part, we have kept sources for future, terminating, and frequently challenged routes. Typically, the sources of the challenged routes are put in hidden notes with brief explanation not to remove as a result of being challenged. The main idea behind this is that it is very easy to verify flights with Airline Route Maps, FlightAware, Google Flights, and Timetables. This makes the sources unecessary unless an editor feels they are needed for a particular reason. This is by no means an official guidline on WP:Airports though. As a result, I will not change this further, but I would suggest that you put a hidden note as to why the source is necessary in this particular case so other editors do not remove it. Thanks! Stinger20 (talk) 02:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

fix citation issue that you tagged?
Hi! I noticed you tagged with. Did I fix the issue that you were wondering about? I wasn't sure what you were getting at. Thanks!G1729 (talk) 07:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC) I just noticed you said "RS" for reliable source? The person talking is credited as the 'major architect' of the executive order by the LA Times. See Development section of the article. Could you remove the citation needed tag if this fixes/clarifies everything of concern? Thanks!G1729 (talk) 07:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The in question gives us a time within a recording that edit-supporting comments were made, but the citation doesn't tell us where you found (or more so, where someone else can find) the recording.  To that end, I added the question of potential RS because without a source for readers to verify against, we don't know if it came from a reputable source (news agency, archives, researcher, etc.) or from an uncredited random something found on a video sharing site; your post above tells me it is clearly the former (LA Times), but LA Times is not identified in your citation.  To address the issues I flagged, please expand your citation to also include at least the publisher's information, the URL of the webpage where the recording can be found, and a date you retrieved it.  Citation templates for different source types are available in the edit screen -- place your cursor where you want the citation inserted, then above the text box find and click "Cite", then click "Templates" and select from the drop-down list, fill in the boxes appropriately once the chosen template appears on your screen, check your work by clicking preview, select insert when satisfied with your citation.  Feel free to drop me a reply on my talk screen if you have any questions or want help with how to put together the citation.  Cariboukid (talk) 17:44, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply! Are you saying that a Fox News clip is not a reliable source of what Stephen Miller said? E.g., another source (such as the LA times) must comment on what Stephen Miller said the purpose of the executive order is for the quote to be relevant? I thought a Fox News link was previously included, but someone may have removed it.G1729 (talk) 18:53, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No, I am not saying a Fox News video clip isn't a reliable source. As I flagged your citation, I am saying the "where to find the source" information is not complete, and not knowing where it came from raises the potential of any citation being considered RS. Example: others reading the article may want to visit the source behind your edit, perhaps to verify for themselves or use it as a source in a research paper, presently they would have to search externally (Google?) against the information you provided, and may or may not reach the exact source you used, thus may or may not get the exact same video clip or information you based your edit on. You have most of the information needed for a viable citation present already, but not enough for others to readily view or verify it directly; at a minimum, please add a full URL for the page you used as your source.  Additional information beyond that (publisher, publication date, accessed date, etc.) is helpful for those wanting to verify or research something they read in an article. If you are unsure what or how to include in a citation, feel free to ask, or take a look at the citation template page. Cariboukid (talk) 00:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ok sure thing; thanks for the clarification. I thought I'd added the link before. Would you mind adding it? I don't want to be accused of challenging someone's edit if they removed the link because my understanding is Volunteer Marek said he would stop me from editing the page if I did so. Because I can't remember whether I previously included the link (which I usually do), I'm hesitant to add it myself. Here is a link. http://video.foxnews.com/v/5302260366001/ Thanks again for the detailed clarification.G1729 (talk) 00:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * As requested, done and done. :) URL added, and I cleaned up the reference to identify show, network, host and guest. I also cleaned up the first reference for same show, so both are consistent, but each having their respected event times within the show. I would, however, suggest you revisit the first citation, maybe shorten its quote for specificity; that sentence about the Obama administration's list of countries seems superfluous to the infiltration part you're calling out. Cariboukid (talk) 05:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much! I will have a look at that quotation in the cite and try to pare it down.G1729 (talk) 06:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)