User talk:Carjuney

February 2023
Hello, I'm Moops. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Carmen Rosales have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 23:14, 14 February 2023 (UTC)


 * What part of editing is considered constructive? Carjuney (talk) 23:19, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You completely changed the name to a false name. I don't think your edit could have been any more clearly an act of vandalism. Please stop that going forward. TY — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 23:31, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Please clarify a false name if it was in the article. Please fact check before you publish articles. Those are very serious allegations to make to a user. I will report you. Vandalism is a strong word to use. There is no identifiers that were edited that were not in the original article.  I'm confused. I asked you a question on what are acceptable and you failed to answer. The name listed is not the real name of the person. Even the name of the article is a name that is not used of the actual person. Carjuney (talk) 23:36, 14 February 2023 (UTC)