User talk:Carl142

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Black Harry 20:19, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Redirect
When you created Electronics simulation, Electronics circuit simulation, Electronics circuit simulator and Electronics lab simulation which was the version which you expected people to edit? Please read this moan and take it to heart.-- RHaworth 09:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

'sorry about that. I had intended for Electronics circuit simulation to be the version that people would edit. I read this moan and it was very helpful. I will definitely use this format in the future

Best regards,

Carl142 15:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Colin Simpson page
The article you wrote about Colin Simpson is missing several important parts. Why is there no mention of fact that he founded Logic Design? I would think a company with $500 million in sales would be noteworthy. Do you want me to add it?

KFullerton 16:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I had mentioned Logic Design in the original article but it was flagged as being an advertisement so I did some extensive editing. The article is still flagged as having peacock terms but I am hoping that this will be resolved as a result of the recent changes that I made.

Carl142 18:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Control relay.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Control Relay.jpg. The copy called Image:Control Relay.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Control_relay.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Control_relay.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 16:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Derating_Factors.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Derating_Factors.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 16:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

CircuitLogix article
Hi Carl. A few more suggestions for the CircuitLogix article:
 * it still sounds a bit biased in certain places, e.g.
 * "The graphic user interface is user-friendly ... "
 * "To date, over 150,000 students worldwide have downloaded the free version of CircuitLogix ..." (needs citation)
 * "...real world electronic devices and tools to enhance the user's comprehension of electronics ..."
 * "... contains a user-friendly GUI to make circuit design easier and more efficient."
 * the sections are a bit too long
 * the "Component library" section seems unnecessary

-Roger (talk) 14:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:CirLogix4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CirLogix4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zginder(talk) (Contrib) 01:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Robot software
Hey Carl, I noticed you removed the cleanup tag on Robot software. I reintroduced it, because the article was actually pretty messy. (ie: I reverted some random Spanish phrase in the article, there was no heading, etc.) Since I noticed you removed it in the first place, I thought you might like to take a look at it. Cheers, Utopianfiat (talk) 20:54, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Poe38.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Poe38.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 06:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Electronics Technician distance education program


A tag has been placed on Electronics Technician distance education program, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Electronics Technician distance education program for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electronics Technician distance education program is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Electronics Technician distance education program until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:CircuitLogix3.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:40, 6 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Colin Simpson1.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:08, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:CircuitLogix3.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CircuitLogix3.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Colin Simpson 1.jpg


The file File:Colin Simpson 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "orphaned image, no encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Electronics Technician distance education program for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electronics Technician distance education program is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Electronics Technician distance education program& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cutlass Ciera 20:24, 29 April 2021 (UTC)