User talk:Carl41

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, Carl41, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Greg Abbott seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Wayne Christian. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. See WP:OPENPARA and don't add fake nationalities to articles Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Cody Johnson, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. SPA account, a Texan I presume :P Mlpearc  ( open channel ) 18:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

June 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. El_C 04:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

What I added was historically accurate and consistent with Robespierre’s own actions and sentiments. In a speech before the Committee of Public Safety on February 4th, 1794, he stated that “ Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue.” This, in addition to the thousands of deaths for which he was directly responsible (during the Reign of *Terror*) in pursuit of political ends, justifies describing Robespierre as a terrorist. To deny this is to deny a fact of history and language. Carl41 (talk) 05:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Please review WP:TERRORIST. Thank you. El_C 05:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)