User talk:CarlEifler4Eva

May 2020
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Drmies (talk) 00:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

I would concur that there is no such thing as this fan club. Was that your only concern? 331dot (talk) 07:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , I'm hoping that the user will consider that our project is actually a serious attempt to write an encyclopedia. Go ahead and unblock, if you are convinced. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 12:55, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * CarlEifler4Eva, what say you? 331dot (talk) 13:42, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Would the fanness be a WP:COI? Is there any other subject of interest. TBH, I'm not dead set against unblocking. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 12:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC) I am not affiliated with, or related to Carl Eifler in any way. Just wanted to add in what I had learned about him from Bomb by Steve Sheinkin, since he seemed like a very interesting character (from what I read). The edit I made was factually correct, but put in the wrong section (sorry about that), and I hope to help expand/edit Wikipedia in the future. CarlEifler4Eva (talk) 17:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to believe you have no specific link to Eifler. I am, however, also inclined to think you are sufficiently a fan of him that it would make you have too much of a COI to make it wise to directly edit the article. Would you be willing to a) disclose a COI and b) agree to only edit the page by making edit requests on the talk page rather than directly edit the article? A rename is probably wise, but wouldn't say it's necessary. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)