User talk:Carl perfecto


 * }

November 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Paul Oakenfold was changed by Carl perfecto (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888146 on 2012-11-26T10:29:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Paul Oakenfold was changed by Carl perfecto (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862023 on 2012-12-12T11:47:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:47, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Oakenfold with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 11:53, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at Paul Oakenfold. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SMC (talk) 12:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Carl perfecto. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Paul Oakenfold, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 12:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 12:17, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Please read all the above notes again. They are for your benefit as if you persist in your conduct you may be blocked from editing. . . Mean as custard (talk) 12:27, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Request an edit
Remember, this is Wikipedia's website, not Paul Oakenfold's. While it is in Wikipedia's best interest to remove inaccurate, inflammatory, and libelous material (see: wp:blp), turning a page into a promotional is not. Please do remove any material with blp issues, but leave a detailed wp:edit summary as to why. If there is insufficient room in the edit summary add "see talk", a brief explaination to the edit summary. If you use "see talk" I would strongly recommend adding to the talk:Paul Oakenfold page before editing the Paul Oakenfold page, otherwise someone may look at the talk page, not see anything and undo your edit. If you want an addition or edit made to the page, you probably should not given that you are a paid advocate and your editing of Paul Oakenfold. Given your history, your changes likely will be carefully scrutinized.

I would suggest that you carefully review: To get material added or changed, request an edit. Put the requested changes (make sure they fall within Wikipedia policy) on talk:Paul Oakenfold and add an edit request. See: wp:edit request. But, first make especially sure it falls within Wikipedia policy and guidelines. Here is an example where an edit request was made: [[Talk:Carolyn_Jarvis You can click the View history tab to see the coinsurance of events.
 * Conflict of interest
 * Spam
 * tutorial

I added a welcome section at the top for your perusal. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:46, 12 December 2012 (UTC)