User talk:Carlaarroyo

Speedy deletion nomination of GEIR NESS
Hello Carlaarroyo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged GEIR NESS for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:53, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Geir Ness


A tag has been placed on Geir Ness requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 01:16, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Status and Advice

 * As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article. On the now deleted talk p. you said : "article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this person is notable by the works he has done for the perfume industry"


 * But I eleted the article primarily because it was promotional:an advertisement for him and his business. "From disasters in manufacturing, to an industry that wanted to see him fail, to an absolutely grueling 300-day a year travel schedule filled with personal and motivational television appearances and radio and magazine interviews, Geir maintains the most positive upbeat and optimistic outlook on life you will ever encounter. " -- just to take one example -- is the sort of prose that does not belong in an encyclopedia, but in an advertisement--it would be a little over the top even for a company web page. Almost the entire contents of the article is just like that.
 * He may be notable. The standard is whether there are references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. 9not that we would consider most write-ups in fashion magazines and the like to me mere announcements of press releases). If you want to try again, however, do it in WP:DRAFT space, where it can be checked before enterig the encyclopedia.


 * In addition, if you have any conflict of interest, see our rules on that at WP:COI and our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure.  DGG ( talk ) 16:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Final warning
I see that DGG gave you some advice above. I also see that it also apparently was not heeded, as I just deleted another promotional article. Firstly, before editing again, please answer the following question with a clear "yes" or "no": Are you being paid, compensated, or employed to edit Wikipedia, including being asked to do so as a duty of employment? If so, you need to make some disclosures, this is not optional. Regardless, you need to clearly answer that question before you edit any more. Whether or not that's the case, promotional content is not allowed. No long laundry lists, no glowing unreferenced articles without a single reference independent of the article subject. Articles should be primarily based on substantial reliable reference material not affiliated with the subject. Under no circumstances may they be based on personal knowledge or opinions of an editor, promote anyone or anything, or in any way be other than strictly neutral. Should you violate these requirements again, you will be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade Talk to me 11:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)