User talk:Carlag

A tag has been placed on William the Superman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. KTC 11:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

JP and Craig

 * Re: JP and Craig
 * I don't really agree. JP has mentioned that he wants to go out with other people, therefore I think they aren't going out anymore. JP was definitely not happy about Craig not wanting to show public affection, therefore I think that they should have "ex-boyfriend" status, but saying that they might get back together again if/when Craig comes back from Ireland. -- [Jam][talk] 15:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

yeah but if Craig did come back for him, he wouldn't be his Ex-boyfriend anymore would he!


 * In my opinion, JP and Craig have split up. JP isn't going to see Craig now unless he returns to Ireland. If he returns, then there is the possibility that they will get back together. Until that happens, I would consider JP and Craig separated. -- [Jam][talk] 15:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Here's proof that he could come back: http://community.livejournal.com/guyburnet/tag/interviews


 * A fan site is not proof that he would come back. Yes, I know that in his Digital Spy interview it said he might come back, but that isn't proof he will. The Channel 4 site says they have broken up, and it is best to leave it as that for the time being. [Jam][talk] 19:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

You really annoy me! I'm not saying that they haven't broken up! All am saying is the the phrase 'currently seperated' leaves open the possibility!


 * Well, I'm sorry if I do, but I'm only trying to keep the articles as correct as possible. What if JP finds another boyfriend? Is he still going to be "currently separated" from Craig? [Jam][talk] 09:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Right, if we leave it as "ex-boyfriend" with the text "currently separated" afterwards, I'll agree to leave it alone. [Jam][talk] 09:36, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stephanie Laurine Urkel
A tag has been placed on Stephanie Laurine Urkel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Stephanie Laurine Urkel
Another editor has added the  template to the article Stephanie Laurine Urkel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok lol. Don't forget to sign your posts with the tilde (~), usually 4 is good. Also, use the talk pages for discussion, not the user page. When you talk, it's good to give a title in the form: == (insert title here) == before you start discussing; keeps everything ordered and concise. If there is already a == (something) ==, such as January 2008 or some other heading, you can use three = signs, which make a subsection.
 * take care ~ GoldenGoose100 (talk) 03:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)