User talk:Carlalune

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 04:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Carlalune for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 00:08, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Cirex
Regarding your query about the above, the article was missing the necessary template to place it in the correct category for review. I see that a template was added by an IP user (not sure if that was you) but it still wasn't quite correct, so I've now fixed it for you. I also see from above that this was declined for acceptance on 24 March, but there have been a significant number of edits since then including addition of some new references, so adding it back to the list seems reasonable in the circumstances. Approval of articles for creation is not an area in which I work, plus I'm not very active on WP right now so don't have the time to check the references and assess it properly myself, but on a cursory glance it doesn't appear to have addressed the concerns of the previous reviewer, so don't be surprised if it is declined again. Take time to read the comments of the reviewer and carefully read the links they provide to Wikipedia policies which will explain in detail why your submission may have been declined. I hope that helps. -- Cactus.man  &#9997;  13:16, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Articles for creation/Cirex.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul 13:25, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Cirex
Hi. In IRC, you asked for help with Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cirex. I remember telling you that you need to find newspaper sources to support the article and that you needed between 5 and 10 newspaper sources to help establish notability, that it would not pass with out this being done. Thus, I'm a bit confused as to why you pre-maturely submitted when many people who have tried to help you in IRC explained that notability is a big problem with this article, and that you need to improve sourcing by doing that. I'm looking at http://www.lemodeartmagazine.info/, and page 19. You need to use Template:cite news or Template:cite journal, complete as much of this as possible and provide translated text as the source is not in English. --LauraHale (talk) 19:50, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles for creation/Cirex
Please stop beating this dead horse. A good dozen editors have told you that the article as it stands is insufficient for Wikipedia; if you can't verifiably show that this artist is notable, then it's time to accept that and move on. Please consider improving other areas of Wikipedia instead of this vain attempt at self-promotion; see WP:Introduction_3 if you're interested. - Running On Brains (talk) 23:50, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Carlalune/Cirex (March 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FoCuSandLeArN&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Your draft article, User:Carlalune/Cirex


Hello Carlalune. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Cirex".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:57, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Idaliz Escalante


A tag has been placed on Idaliz Escalante, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 07:11, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

An belated welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 19:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source
Hi Carlalune. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for biographical information in Eli Fantasy. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 01:06, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hail Sagan


The article Hail Sagan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Poor references. May not be notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:03, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Hail Sagan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hail Sagan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hail Sagan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 00:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Plush Mush


A tag has been placed on Plush Mush requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://mtvrock.com/2021/01/03/plush-mush/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Carlalune

Thank you for creating Plush Mush.

User:Whiteguru, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 00:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Christian Hollingworth


A tag has been placed on Christian Hollingworth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Fram (talk) 13:56, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wolf Archives


A tag has been placed on Wolf Archives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:53, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Wolf Archives
Hi, I fix it, doesnt sounds promotional Carlalune (talk) 15:50, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Carla

Thanks

Cirex moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Cirex. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... disco spinster   talk  03:19, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Plush Mush for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plush Mush is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Plush Mush until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ... disco spinster   talk  03:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cirex
Hello, Carlalune. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cirex, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)