User talk:Carlapple

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reginald DesRoches (April 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dreamy Jazz was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reginald DesRoches and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Reginald DesRoches, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Reginald_DesRoches Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dreamy_Jazz&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Reginald_DesRoches reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 19:40, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Carlapple. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Reginald DesRoches, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 07:28, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Carlapple Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Carlapple&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Carlapple reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carlapple (talk) 16:47, 20 August 2019 (UTC) I think this entry is ready to go--

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reginald DesRoches (September 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reginald DesRoches and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Reginald DesRoches, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Reginald_DesRoches Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gbawden&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Reginald_DesRoches reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for shared use of this account and undeclared paid editing in violation of the Terms of Use. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Huon (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

If you aren't going to use this account again, there is no need to remove the block. The block can be altered to allow you to create a new account, but only if the other issues are resolved first. Is there anything you want to edit about(paid or unpaid) other than Dr. DesRoches? 331dot (talk) 16:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

No, there isn't. This is the only page I wish to edit and submit for publishing. Can the block be altered so a new account can be created?
 * Someone else will review your request, but you said "this is the only page I wish to edit and submit for publishing" when I asked you if you wanted to edit about other topics. You didn't mention a desire to edit about other clients. 331dot (talk) 20:31, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Under the circumstances, allowing a rename would be foolhardy. It would incur the risk of you continuing to exploit Wikipedia and to gain from it.--  Deep fried  okra    07:23, 27 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Do what you must. I respect your decision. Like I said I was hired to write a wikipedia page for a company that wanted a page written about a person whom I believe doesn't have anything to do with the company. Not really clear as to how that exploits Wikipedia. But it does not matter. There is no magical word that can be said to remove the block. You initially claimed that the block was there because I failed to understand the rules. When I listed the rules I broke and explained how I broke them, you didn't unblock me. Thus proving that the reasons I was blocked did not matter. When I said I would become a meaningful contributor for the future, you didn't unblock me. Also proving that did it not matter either. In truth, you never had any intention of unblocking me. So therefore you clearly don't want paid editors to be on Wikipedia. You should just state that for the future. I'm sorry you don't believe me when I say I would be an objective editor whose dedicated to only delivering facts that are devoid of bias or judgement values because that's all I wanted to do. Carlapple (talk) 15:17, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Since you aren't requesting unblock, I have removed the unblock request formatting from your statement. I'm sorry you feel that way, but you haven't been completely forthright with us(and me).  Paid editors are permitted if they are up front about it, but not if they want to make editing Wikipedia their career. As I said, if you want to be a general contributor and make contributions regardless of whether or not you are paid for them, you need to convince us of that, but it's difficult to trust what you say based on your past statements.  331dot (talk) 19:24, 27 November 2019 (UTC)