User talk:Carlistdon/NSP6 (rotavirus)

Peer Review Response I acknowledge the critique that was in regard to my draft and plan on trying to expand on the areas mentioned. I'm still in search of a non-copyrighted/free-to-public domain image. I plan on linking the 'MAP1LC3B puncta wiki so that readers can refer to that article to better understand'MAP1LC3B puncta. I also plan on expanding on the topic of mutations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlistdon (talk • contribs) 01:20, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review
Overall, I appreciate how the newly added information provides me with a better understanding of NSP6 (rotavirus). Adding the function of NSP6 was the highlight of the edits because, it is important information to know, that the previous Wikipedia user left out. The flow and the format of the information given was orderly and concise. The information given was free from any bias, thoughts and opinions. In addition there were enough credible citations provided to support all information given.

Although it may seem like a trivial change, I think a picture (non-copyrighted/ free for public domain) could only enhance the information being shared. Also, a brief description or explanation of certain terms such ( MAP1LC3B puncta) is always quite helpful for the reader. It does not have to deter you from your main point, but it allows the reader to read with understanding. Lastly you nailed a lot of the core information, but maybe you can add a topic delving into mutations that occur within NSP6 (rotavirus). As well describe the potential effects that come with these mutations. I saw a few potential pdfs online that highlight that kind of information.

Overall, this is a great start, and if you do choose to add more, I would add subheadings to separate thoughts and have the reader know what each body paragraph is discussing. Pashf001 (talk) 22:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)