User talk:Carliteminute

April 2020
Hello, I'm Davey2010. I noticed that you recently removed content from AirAsia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

October 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Malaysian Islamic Party, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Seloloving. I noticed that you recently removed content from United Malays National Organisation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Seloloving (talk) 10:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

May I know what is PAS's stance on non-Muslims?
Regarding your removal of content about PAS, which mentions that PAS supports an Islamic theocracy and hatred of Christians, may I know from you how does the party treat non-Muslims?

PulauKakatua19 (talk) 12:31, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

== I'm not supporters of PAS or PN either. But we can't directly identified PAS as terrorist group just because congratulate the Taliban and fyi I also not a supporter of Taliban. On stances on non-muslim I guess I have no info about it. But this is only my opinion, before Hadi PAS did really well, Kelantan example under Tok Guru he take care of the state. On example the Buddha but imo I didn't really seem that PAS is terrorist


 * Hi there after reading your statement yes we cannot label them as terrorist group but the reason why it is labelled as "disputed affiliation" is place there is because Isis is due to PAS members had join the ISIS cause in Iraq and Syria. Taliban is placed in there because they had congratulated the Taliban. Please understand the word "disputed affiliation" means that the affiliation is arguable and not an actual affiliation of by the party so that people learn from the action by PAS. However many people had their own views but we try to be as neutral while editing. Not be be bias here but PAS maybe a bit tolerant on race as long as you are part of islam. Now regarding the ideology, Anti Christ sentiment is because PAS had place certain very controversial laws like the infamous huddud law implemented on Terengganu which cause christian not allow to place their cross on public display. Moreover, former member Mohammed Sabu had also warn people that ISIS like thinking (islamofacism) is already infiltrated PAS and PAS also had tendencies to implement huddud law on federal level for all citizen of malaysia regardless muslim or not which is inherently not constitutional or fair. I'm here not arguing on whether PAS in itself is good or not but what they did was right or not. Francabicon (talk) 19:36, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi there, I did understand for that statement so to make its equal. I can also edit DAP page for supporting terrorist group (who ?) Ganesan Saminathan (ADUN Gadek) and (which group of terrorist ?) LTTE. In my opinion, you can't label all the party member as the terrorist or etc. In case with that I can also label all DAP's as terrorist. Isn't ? I'm really sorry if my words was too rude but I hope you are in good condition (p/s remember to read in peace tone not in angry tone)


 * Hmmm I'm not mad or angry but i'm actually ok with your argument and it is infact good to had a civil argument so that misunderstanding won't happen unlike people who doesn't want to talk about it and just revert the edit.Well maybe you might think that i just judge a few bad apples out of a apple trees but i do see pas members in isis ranks which is why we place it because you can't have PAS members join Isis so easily without temptation within the party members itself or else members from UMNO and Bersatu would also join terrorist organization too who by the way are also considered a religious party too. If not i would had place Isis in bersatu or umno pages. However No offense if you feel offended don't take it too seriously but it is just a civil discussion so we are civil people. Since this is still on discussion i'll not place disputed affiliation but I'll revert back the ideology in the topic. It is nice talking to you please if you had any concern or counter argument do let me know. Thank You. User:Francabicon|Francabicon]] (talk) 00:17, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Naa'ah I'm not angry but I maybe my word. I'm not thinking you're a bad apple it's fine but for me It's a bit not comfortable to see any of Malaysian political parties ideologies section has that part. This will make others foreigner that visit our political parties page will make them think that malaysian political parties supporting terrorist group. By the way, it is really nice to talk with you and sorry again if my words were too rude.