User talk:Carlo pastrani

March 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Giuseppe Sacco, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Giuseppe Sacco. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Giuseppe Sacco with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  15:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, Carlo pastrani. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Giuseppe Sacco, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at Giuseppe Sacco. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dl2000 (talk) 00:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Giuseppe Sacco, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 00:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Giuseppe Sacco, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:32, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Temporary block
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing and edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 15:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Please understand that Wikipedia is not a place for people to write their own profiles, or instruct their employees to do it. As you work for Giuseppe Sacco, you should not be writing about him directly. Please read, carefully, these guidelines: There is advice for people concerned with articles about themselves or their connections at Biographies of living persons/Help. If there are inaccuracies in the article, what you should do is, explain on the article talk page what changes you suggest, giving links to reliable sources to comply with the Verifiability policy.
 * Conflict of interest
 * Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * Autobiography

What you should not do is continue to edit-war on the article itself. If you persist, you will be blocked for longer.

If you encounter problems, a message at the WP:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard will bring help from users familiar with these articles.

JohnCD (talk) 15:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 15:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC)