User talk:Carlos8806

Welcome!

Hello, Carlos8806, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Chasse Consulting Sales Strategies Inc., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 10:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Chasse Consulting Sales Strategies Inc.


A tag has been placed on Chasse Consulting Sales Strategies Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 10:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry
When I wrote the above, I had not noticed that the article had been previously deleted and its first author blocked as a role account. Within three hours this account was set up and re-created the article. It does not matter if you are not actually the same person: closely connected users may be considered a single user for Wikipedia's purposes if they edit with the same objectives. Therefore: __NOINDEX__ JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Unblock request
Two things; firstly, the page cannot be deleted any more than it already is. Secondly, if you are unblocked you will not be allowed to edit articles relating to a company with which you are closely involved. What else would you want to write about? --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 19:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Okay, well see there lies my concern. I'd hate for the page to stay the way it is with that big red banner displayed mentioned how it's been deleted for such and such reason. Especially when no one from the company wrote that article.  See, the company volunteers with a variety of charitable organizations, in particular Manos de Cristo of Austin.  They also do work with Charity: Water, Empact Africa, WorldVision, St. Jude's and a foreign exchange program where they give interns from overseas an opportunity to work in the U.S.  I feel their contributions are grounds to let them have a wiki, even if it's a little blurb like this company: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tocquigny  This is where my inspiration came from.  I thought I could write something like this since they have one too.  Can I ask why that article is allowed?  If I crafted one similar to it, then, would one for Chasse be allowed to stand on Wikipedia?  I just feel that it is sorely unfair for this company, that I feel makes a contributable effort in the local community, to now have a bad wiki when it wasn't there fault.  I can guarentee I will only mention those things that fall in realm of the user guidelines.  Look, here's a link to the Austin Business Journal's article on the CEO: http://austin.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2008/08/04/story13.html I'd be willing to take some advice, too, on how to write it such that it isn't deleted again and i'm not blocked again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlos8806 (talk • contribs)
 * A Wikipedia entry is not given as a reward for being good and virtuous and doing charity work - see Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause; and "They have an article so we should have one too" is not considered a valid argument.


 * Don't worry about the big red banner - within a day or two, Google will have updated itself and the link to Wikipedia will no longer come up on a search. JohnCD (talk) 09:15, 25 June 2010 (UTC)