User talk:Carlos Martin Montañes

Your submission at Articles for creation: MTBVAC (December 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:MTBVAC may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Carlos_Martin_Monta%C3%B1es Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Novem_Linguae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Carlos_Martin_Monta%C3%B1es reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Novem Linguae (talk) 13:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:MTBVAC has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:MTBVAC. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:38, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Carlos Martin Montañes. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:MTBVAC, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. ''You appear to be one of the authors of the papers you cited. You should declare your connection to the article on your userpage.'' Nick Moyes (talk) 15:05, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Tuberculosis vaccines. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

If you copy content from a CC-BY source (such as the one you are an author of) you must include an Edit Summary which credits that source. This avoids the confusion I have just stumbled in to whereby I deleted what appeared to be copyright content in Draft:MTBVAC that you had not credited, and only later spotted the licence under which it was released. You may reinsert it if you wish, but you must use an edit summary to link to and credit the sources, and explain under what licence you are able to copy/paste it. If you don't, this problem will probably recur. This requirement still applies even if you are the author of that cited source. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 15:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ''You have breached the licencing conditions when you pasted text from this source See https://zendal.com/en/legal-notice/. Even if you are the author of the copyrighted content, you must adhere to the licence conditions of the original source. You may donate copyright material by following guidelines at Donating copyrighted materials. Unless you take great care to credit all CC-BY sources, and respect copyright publications, you will have your editing privileges withdrawn in order to protect the legal rights of the original owners.'' Nick Moyes (talk) 14:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)