User talk:Carlos Rodriguez Rivas

April 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Use of saffron, you may be blocked from editing. ''Alternative medicine and Ayurveda sources are unreliable, unscientific quackery. We use WP:MEDRS sources for content related to human health.'' Zefr (talk) 15:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * Thank you very much for your comments.
 * I would like to know if studies published in PubMed do not have sufficient scientific support. For example: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28735826/
 * I understand that there may be articles based on deception and lies, but I have tried to make sure that my sources have scientific backing.
 * If not, I am sorry.
 * Regards. Carlos Rodriguez Rivas (talk) 06:16, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Use of saffron. Zefr (talk) 15:38, 4 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi. I don't understand why are you saying all this things. The sources are published and I am talking aleays about preliminary results. I think that for some personal reason you are continually blocking my publication, because the sources I indicate are reliable, not smoke peddlers. 88.0.75.39 (talk) 16:08, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Read WP:MEDRS - that is the guideline for choosing sources for medical content on Wikipedia. The sources you have been inserting are either from alternative medicine (quackery) or inconclusive primary research, not MEDRS reviews. Also, PubMed is just a listing service and does not publish peer-reviewed articles itself. It seems you don't have expertise to judge the quality of medical sources, WP:CIR. Perhaps you should edit content you do know to facilitate your enjoyment for editing Wikipedia. Zefr (talk) 17:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)