User talk:Carlossuarez46/Archive 19

Proposed deletion of Mills Orchard, California


The article Mills Orchard, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nonexistent locale. One of dozens of articles mass-created in a short time by a now-retired user, based entirely on an entry in GNIS (which does not establish notability). Site is just an orchard, no evidence it was ever a populated community."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norman, California


The article Norman, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a community, a point on a railroad near a freeway exit with nothing around for miles. One of dozens of articles mass-created in a few days by the same user, using only GNIS entries, which do not establish notability. Likely never a populated place."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Copper City, Glenn County, California


The article Copper City, Glenn County, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a notable locale, no information found. One of dozens of articles mass-created in a short period by a single user, from nothing but informationless GNIS entries. Second reference is a broken link."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:36, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Malton, California


The article Malton, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Former railway point, not a 'ghost town'. No information found other than Wikipedia-scraping SEO junk sites. One of dozens of articles created in a few days by the same user, from nothing but informationless GNIS entries.  Never notable and no evidence it was populated."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hales Grove, California


The article Hales Grove, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location. One of dozens of articles about nonexistent California locales mass-created in a few days, using nothing but content-less GNIS data (which does not establish notability), by the same now-retired user. Site is just a house in the woods; no sources of information found except SEO junk sites that scrape Wikipedia."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Forks, California


The article The Forks, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location. One of dozens of stub articles mass-created on nonexistent California locales, by the same user, based on nothing but a GNIS entry (which does not establish notability). No information found, no evidence this was a populated place."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Farley, California


The article Farley, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This former railroad point is not notable. One of dozens of articles on nonexistent California locales mass-created in a few days by a retired user, based on nothing but GNIS entries (which do not establish notability). No information found that this was ever a populated place."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rendan


A tag has been placed on Rendan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mina, California


The article Mina, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-existent locale, no indication of notability. This is one of dozens of articles mass-created in a few days in 2009 by the same now-retired user, based on nothing but GNIS entires (which do not count for notability). No information this site was ever inhabited, let alone notable; location is now an intersection in an open field."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pieta, California


The article Pieta, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable former railroad point on a now-abandoned railroad. One of many such articles on nonexistent California locations created by the same user during a few-day period in 2009, based on nothing but GNIS coordinates (which do not count for notability). No information about this site found except from SEO junk sites that scrape Wikipedia."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:39, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Upp, California


The article Upp, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-existent location. One of many articles on non-notable California locations created during a short period in 2009 by the same editor, based on nothing but information-less GNIS entries (which do not establish notability). No information found except for sites that scrape Wikipedia, no evidence of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shake City, California


The article Shake City, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nonexistent location. One of dozens of such articles created by the same user in 2009, based on nothing but GNIS coordinates (which do not establish notability). Mapping the site shows it is empty forest with no sign of habitation.  No evidence found this location is or ever was inhabited, thus failing WP: GEOLAND."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:45, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Flumeville, California


The article Flumeville, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nonexistent location. One of dozens of stubs on non-notable California locations created in a few days in 2009 by the same user, based on nothing but GNIS coordinates (which do not establish notability). No information about this site found except SEO trash sites that scrape Wikipedia for keywords.  No evidence of population or notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Montgomery, California


The article Montgomery, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nonexistent location. One of dozens of stubs on non-notable California locales located during a few-day period in 2009 by the same editor, based on nothing but GNIS coordinates (which do not establish notability). Site geolocates to the middle of a forest with no human structures anywhere nearby.  No information found this site is or ever was inhabited, thus failing WP:GEOLAND."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ridgewood Park, California


The article Ridgewood Park, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nonexistent location. One of dozens of similar stubs on non-notable California locales created by the same user during a few-day period in 2009, based on nothing but GNIS coordinates, which do not establish notability. Site is now a rural intersection.  No information found that this is or ever was an inhabited place."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Irmulco, California


The article Irmulco, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable railway point, now located in an empty forest with no human habitation anywhere nearby. One of dozens of similar stubs on non-notable California locales created during a few-day period in 2009 by the same editor, based only on GNIS coordinates (which do not establish notability). No evidence this site is or ever was populated."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Soda Springs (near Burbeck), Mendocino County, California


The article Soda Springs (near Burbeck), Mendocino County, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable spring. One of dozens of such stubs on non-notable California locations created by the same editor during a short period in 2009, based only on GNIS coordinates (which do not count for notability). No evidence at all found for population, history, or notability of any kind."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Former populated places in Tehran Province


A tag has been placed on Category:Former populated places in Tehran Province indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗ plicit  12:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Copper City, Glenn County, California for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Copper City, Glenn County, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Copper City, Glenn County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 18:35, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Norman, California for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norman, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Norman, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 18:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Irmulco, California for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irmulco, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Irmulco, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 18:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Soda Springs (near Burbeck), Mendocino County, California for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soda Springs (near Burbeck), Mendocino County, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Soda Springs (near Burbeck), Mendocino County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 18:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Greenwood, Glenn County, California


The article Greenwood, Glenn County, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location. One of dozens of low-effort articles on minor California locations created by the same editor in few-week period in 2009, based only on GNIS entries. I could find this site appearing on a couple of old maps but no information about it at all, appears to have been only a flag railroad stop."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Zirkeyk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zirkeyk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zirkeyk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 14:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kalnadan-e Pain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalnadan-e Pain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kalnadan-e Pain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 14:17, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Hoseynabad-e Alam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoseynabad-e Alam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hoseynabad-e Alam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 14:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Tazehabad-e Tumar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tazehabad-e Tumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tazehabad-e Tumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 14:35, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Ebrahimabad-e Bala Joveyn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ebrahimabad-e Bala Joveyn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ebrahimabad-e Bala Joveyn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 14:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kahur Abbas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kahur Abbas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kahur Abbas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 14:37, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Ganj Konar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ganj Konar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ganj Konar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 14:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Shahidayit-e Shandak for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahidayit-e Shandak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shahidayit-e Shandak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Pishakhor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pishakhor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pishakhor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 14:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Hoseyniyeh-ye Mashkur for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoseyniyeh-ye Mashkur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hoseyniyeh-ye Mashkur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karkhaneh-ye Ard


A tag has been placed on Karkhaneh-ye Ard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 13:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rahdarkhaneh


A tag has been placed on Rahdarkhaneh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 15:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Guk Tappeh


A tag has been placed on Guk Tappeh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 15:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mazraeh-ye Garayili


A tag has been placed on Mazraeh-ye Garayili requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 15:46, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ushan


A tag has been placed on Ushan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 15:49, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Padegan Qods


A tag has been placed on Padegan Qods requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 16:19, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rud Gaz


A tag has been placed on Rud Gaz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 16:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Keshtargah


A tag has been placed on Keshtargah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 16:58, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ab Kalaiyeh


A tag has been placed on Ab Kalaiyeh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 23:48, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bid-e Lang


A tag has been placed on Bid-e Lang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 23:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Madan-e Gach


A tag has been placed on Madan-e Gach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 23:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mowtowr-e Zargareha


A tag has been placed on Mowtowr-e Zargareha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 23:58, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Palis Rah


A tag has been placed on Palis Rah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 23:58, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pam Pabanzin


A tag has been placed on Pam Pabanzin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 23:59, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Senjan (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Senjan (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:00, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ravak


A tag has been placed on Ravak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 01:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Belalabad


A tag has been placed on Belalabad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 02:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pomo, California


The article Pomo, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Another article on a non-notable California locale based only on GNIS entry. The fact that there was a post office there once is not a sign of notability as rural post offices were often just farmhouses. Hard to find information on this site since most searches give hits for the Pomo People or Pomo Language, but no evidence at all found of existence, let alone notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Twin Rocks, California


The article Twin Rocks, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This is not an 'unincorporated community'. It is just a geographic feature along a highway. Sourced only to GNIS, which does not establish notability.  There are several other Twin Rocks in California, making this article a useless and confusing sub-stub."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2014–15 in English ice hockey


A tag has been placed on Category:2014–15 in English ice hockey indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Copper City, California


A tag has been placed on Copper City, California requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 05:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ijdan


The article Ijdan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No useful reliable secondary sources found"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Equalwidth (talk) 06:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).



Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg 0xDeadbeef
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Tamzin
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Dennis Brown

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Pppery
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ragesoss · TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news
 * The WMF is working on making it possible for administrators to edit MediaWiki configuration directly. This is similar to previous work on Special:EditGrowthConfig. A technical RfC is running until November 08, where you can provide feedback.
 * There is a proposed plan for re-enabling the Graph Extension. Feedback on this proposal is requested.

Arbitration
 * Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
 * , and  have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections.  is the reserve commissioner.
 * Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
 * Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
 * Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
 * Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
 * An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

Miscellaneous
 * The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ciudad Altamirano (disambiguation)


The article Ciudad Altamirano (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:TWODABS, both redirect to the same page."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 21:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Hokokwito, California for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hokokwito, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hokokwito, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. FOARP (talk) 16:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sprekelsville, California


The article Sprekelsville, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location. Zero coverage found in any source other than SEO junk sites and sites that scrape WP. One reference to Sprekelsville found in a Stockton newspaper from 1908, but that article refers to a site in Hawaii.  This is another of the many low-effort articles sourced only to GNIS created by the same user during a short period in 2009."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 19:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Motor City, California


The article Motor City, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location. Outside WP content mirrors, I could find only 4 passing mentions to this place: A directory of field employees of the soil conservation service, confirming one employee lived there; a 1936 newspaper column mentioning a band playing there, a 1949 article about a historical wagon train re-enactment that would stop there, and a 1962 article about a sewer extension in Placerville. All of these are trivial mentions with no information beyond existence, and existence is not notability.  One of the many articles created in a short span in 2009 based on nothing but GNIS entries."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 19:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Nabakhsh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nabakhsh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nabakhsh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 08:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Karizan-e Sofla for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karizan-e Sofla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Karizan-e Sofla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 08:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Hoseynabad-e Shageman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoseynabad-e Shageman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hoseynabad-e Shageman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 08:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Gol Gazabad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gol Gazabad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gol Gazabad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 08:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kul Bazan-e Yek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kul Bazan-e Yek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kul Bazan-e Yek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 08:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Shenin Hoseyn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shenin Hoseyn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shenin Hoseyn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 08:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Zeh Badi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zeh Badi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zeh Badi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 08:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kurkaj for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kurkaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kurkaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hongsy (talk) 08:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Neufeld, California


The article Neufeld, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not an unincorporated community, a thoroughly un-notable railroad point that geolocates to an open field. One of dozens of low-effort articles on nonexistent California places created by the same retired user during a brief period in 2009, based only on GNIS entries. Absolutely no information about this place found, failing WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC) == Proposed deletion of this site] states "with its stunning natural landscapes, vibrant community, and easy access to nearby attractions, Jasmin has something to offer for everyone".  SEO garbage like this is all the information about the location that could be found; there is a Jasmin Vineyards but a vineyard/winery is not a "community".  One of countless low-effort articles on non-notable California locales mass-created during a few-week period in 2009 by the same now-retired user, based only on GNIS entries, which do not establish notability. ==

The article this site] states "with its stunning natural landscapes, vibrant community, and easy access to nearby attractions, Jasmin has something to offer for everyone". SEO garbage like this is all the information about the location that could be found; there is a Jasmin Vineyards but a vineyard/winery is not a "community".  One of countless low-effort articles on non-notable California locales mass-created during a few-week period in 2009 by the same now-retired user, based only on GNIS entries, which do not establish notability. has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable railway point. There was once a post office there, but per established precedent this does not indicate notability. Satellite images reveal nothing but a few agricultural buildings at the site, but [https://isp.page/fr/a/Jasmin-A-Hidden-Gem-in-Kern-County-California"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hights Corner, California


The article Hights Corner, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable crossroads. Geotag locates to the parking lot of a church, with some warehouses nearby; not even RoadsideThoughts has anything to say about this nonexistent place. One of dozens of low-quality stubs created based on nothing but GNIS entries, by the same user in a few-week period in 2009.  Completely non-notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bena, California


The article Bena, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This 'unincorporated community' is a point on the railroad tracks in an empty field. There is a Bena Road and a Bena Landfill, but no community. Another low-effort article based solely on GNIS entries created by the same retired user during a brief period in 2009.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND as there is no evidence this was a populated place; existence of a post office does not establish notability per precedent."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shirley Meadows, California


The article Shirley Meadows, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location. Satellite images show empty forest at this location; there is a Shirley Meadows Road and a skiing facility, but no 'community'. Name likely refers to the previous name of the Alta Sierra ski resort, which is non-notable; there is no evidence that this is or ever was a populated place, thus failing WP:GEOLAND."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Hights Corner, California for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hights Corner, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hights Corner, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robinsons Corner, California


The article Robinsons Corner, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a 'community', a literal corner of two roads in the middle of farmland. Completely non-notable location. There was once a dance hall at this site, as confirmed by numerous local newspaper ads and articles; having grown up in the area I can confirm the building was standing into the 1980s at least.  But now there is nothing there, and there was never a community, just a dance/meeting hall.  Since this was not a populated place, it fails WP:GEOLAND and absence of significant coverage fails WP:GNG.  One of many such stubs created by the same user in 2009, based only on GNIS entries."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Freshwater Corners, California


The article Freshwater Corners, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Yet another non-notable California location article created by the same retired user during a few-week binge in 2009. No information about this site found that is distinct from Freshwater, California (itself of questionable notability); thus failing WP:GNG. Not a legally-recognized place (apparently people can't even agree on its name), thus fails WP:GEOLAND.  Having a store does not confer notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Millersville, California


The article Millersville, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nonexistent locale. Nothing about this location found in a search of Kern County newspapers; the only online mention I could find (other than in Wikipedia mirrors) was a 1968 directory of California government officials, where it appears exactly once with no information about its location . Not verifiable, let alone notable.  Coordinates given are for a canyon with a couple of scattered buildings in the area, not a community.  One of the many articles created in a short period in 2009 by the same user, based only on GNIS entries, which do not establish notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Saco, California for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saco, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Saco, California& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alameda, Kern County, California


The article Alameda, Kern County, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location. Coordinates are for a crossroad in a rural area, with what looks like a stockyard in aerial images. No information about this location found except that there was once an 'Alameda Improvement Club', which from context may be referring to Alameda, California near Oakland.  No additions to article since its creation, based on a GNIS entry, in 2009.  Fails WP:GEOLAND."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cinco, California


The article Cinco, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "By its own admission, this article is not about an 'unincorporated community' but a temporary work camp for construction of the Los Angeles Aqueduct in 1910. No other information found; satellite image of coordinates show a single farmhouse surrounded by desert. Another low-effort stub created based only on GNIS entries, which do not establish notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sanborn, California


The article Sanborn, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable railway siding in the desert. Not a 'community' at all. Another stub based entirely on GNIS entries, which do not establish notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Riverkern, California


The article Riverkern, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location; little information found. One of dozens of similar low-effort stubs created by the same user during a short period in 2009, based only on GNIS entries, which do not establish notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aerial Acres, California


The article Aerial Acres, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location; appears to be a rural water district, not a 'community'. Little information about the site found, although this: does give the glowing review: 'Being here already, consider visiting Desert Lake . We collected some hobby film on the internet . Scroll down to see the most favourite one or select the video collection in the navigation. Check out our recommendations for Aerial Acres ? We have collected some references on our attractions page.'  SEO garbage like this is all that can be found about this place, making it unworthy of WP, and without evidence of it being populated or legally-recognized, a fail of WP:GEOLAND."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mayfair, Kern County, California


The article Mayfair, Kern County, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Absolutely no information found about this location. Site geolocates to housing developments surrounded by agricultural fields. News and book search turned up nothing.  Clear failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG, and even WP:V, as no information other than the two cited (non-reliable) sources suggests this is a place.  Another of the many stubs on non-notable California locations created by the same user during a few-week jag in 2009, based on GNIS (which does not establish notability)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Meridian, Kern County, California


The article Meridian, Kern County, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No information at all found about this location. Failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG, and possibly even WP:V as no sources other than the two non-reliable cited sources even name this place as a place. Yet another of the dozens of stubs on non-notable California locations created by the same user during a few-week spree in 2009, based only on GNIS entries."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Millux, California


The article Millux, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable railway point. Only passing mentions found suggesting this was a rail siding and possible worker housing site, not a 'community' (let alone a legally-recognized place). Lack of evidence of population or recognition fails WP:GEOLAND.  Another stub on non-notable California locations created based solely on GNIS entries by the same prolific low-effort user during a brief spree in 2009."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ricardo, California


The article Ricardo, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location. No information found. Not legally recognized and no evidence of population; coordinates geolocate to empty desert.  Fails WP:GEOLAND.  Another stub based solely on GNIS, by the same creator as dozens of other low-effort California place stubs."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Woodford, California


The article Woodford, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable railroad point. All mentions found in media have been trivial and passing, citing this location as a flood- and washout-prone spot on the rail line over Tehachapi Pass; none mention the place as populated. It thus fails WP:GEOLAND.  This is one of the dozens of low-effort stubs created by the same user in May-June 2009, based solely on GNIS, which does not establish notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brown, California


The article Brown, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No information found about this non-notable railroad spot. Fails WP:GEOLAND. Another low-effort stub about a non-notable California location created by the same user in 2009, based on GNIS data (which do not conver notability).  Satellite image of the coordinates show empty desert with a small orchard and building, not a populated place."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)