User talk:Carmelboy

Template:"Hong Kong finds melamine in two Cadbury products" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:&quot;Hong Kong finds melamine in two Cadbury products&quot;. Since you had some involvement with the Template:"Hong Kong finds melamine in two Cadbury products" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 06:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Emmanuel Adebayor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Emmanuel Adebayor was changed by Carmelboy (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-03-23T15:01:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Spam (food), even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at ElgooG, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: ElgooG was changed by Carmelboy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97032 on 2011-03-24T19:12:00+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:12, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Alan Ball Memorial Cup. --   Edderso       talk          contribs  19:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Cite news. His first game in charge resulted in a 3-2 loss at home to Chesterfield.


A tag has been placed on Template:Cite news. His first game in charge resulted in a 3-2 loss at home to Chesterfield., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 10:47, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Article listed for deletion
Hi. As you appear to be the user that moved Danzelle Hamilton form userspace to mainspace with the rationale "seems notable enough, has played in a football match, part of the stoke squad." I thought I'd let you know I have nominated this article for deletion at Articles for deletion/Danzelle Hamilton, as he did not play for Stoke and the other sides he played for are below level normally accepted as inferring notability.-- Club Oranje T 08:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Paul Gascoigne, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ♦ Jongleur100 ♦ talk 22:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ghana's tentative consideration of bidding to be the venue for the 2032 Summer Olympics
A tag has been placed on Ghana's tentative consideration of bidding to be the venue for the 2032 Summer Olympics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 23:02, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ian Rush, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Speedy deletion of Template:Liverpoolbasher
A tag has been placed on Template:Liverpoolbasher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 14:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for vandalism and disruptive editing. Please read the information provided at the top of this page and learn how to be a constuctive contributor here. Please take the time to do this as your next block may be more permanent. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa (Talk) 18:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Commentators Curse


Hello, Carmelboy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Commentators Curse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 12:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)