User talk:Carmen Melendez

30 April 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Be Cool, Scooby-Doo!, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Katniss  May the odds be ever in your favor ♥  01:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

20 May 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of The Loud House episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 21:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
This edit is concerning. You are not an admin, thus, you cannot protect any page on Wikipedia. Further edits like this are considered WP:DISRUPTIVE and can lead to a block. Your cooperation in this will be appreciated. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 22:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ''You are exactly one disruptive edit from being blocked. Knock it off. '' Ad Orientem (talk) 02:29, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

You appear to have returned to the same pattern of disruptive editing that got you blocked just a few days ago. If this continues you are likely to be blocked again and or you may be called to WP:ANI where you may be subjected to a topic ban. I would prefer not go down that road, but the choice is yours. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Other Accounts
Are you and the same person? -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Ad Orientem (talk) 00:25, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Final Warning
There is a strong consensus that you have been engaging in sock puppetry using both other accounts and editing while logged out. I also note that you have declined to answer a very straightforward question that I posed above as well as another I posted on IJBall's talk page. Between that and your persistent disruptive editing we are about at the end of the road. So I am going to lay this out as plainly as I can. You are in the express lane heading for the exit marked "Indefinite Block." I advise you to switch lanes while you still have time. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:09, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)