User talk:Caroldenisgreen

Welcome
 Hello Caroldenisgreen, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Caroldenisgreen, good luck, and have fun. -- JOJ Hutton  17:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Hello, Caroldenisgreen. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Executive Office of the President of the United States, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ''Your user name resembles a name you added to the article, which suggests that you are either working at the White House, are adding incorrect information, or are simply resembling the person. Either way, most of this should be sourced. '' JOJ  Hutton  17:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Advisory Boards and Intelligence to the President of the United States


A tag has been placed on Advisory Boards and Intelligence to the President of the United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. KTC (talk) 13:56, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Cncplayer. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Executive Office of the President of the United States, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 18:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Caroldenisgreen for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 18:19, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Executive Office of the President of the United States with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 18:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Executive Office of the President of the United States with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 18:21, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Executive Office of the President of the United States. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 18:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – Connormah (talk) 18:53, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – Connormah (talk) 21:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC)