User talk:CaroleHenson/Archive 12

Requesting an unbiased vote
Hi,

Your unbiased vote is requested here.

Thanks. — usernamekiran [talk]   20:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I apologise for getting you involved in this mess. I feel bad about it. Sorry again. — usernamekiran  [talk]   02:41, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries. I didn't get very involved, I just posted my opinion.–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Grilled Chicken of Wichian Buri
For the content that I have added, the source is the reference no.2 (The legend of roasted chicken Wichian Buri) If I merge the cited content into Wichian Buri District, will Wikipedia accepted my work? I need Wikipedia to accept my work in order to get working points from my English subject teacher. Bjj dev (talk) 19:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, I added the source.


 * Sure, go ahead. I would add the section before the References section and call it Wichian Buri Grilled Chicken and then no subsections under that. Let me make a couple of edits first. One sec.–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * , Ok, see what you think. If you like that, just the body of the article is moved (nothing from references down and not the deletion tag). And the bold with three apostrophes (''') should be removed in both places.–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * , Maybe I overworked this for you. Another idea is to draft summary language for kai yang, perhaps that would be a good, new addition. If you have cited content, it should be good. I am happy to help, if you'd like.–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Today, i have discussed with my teacher and he told me that it might be better to merge with Wichian buri district article. So, I can just copy the paragraph of Grilled chicken of wichian buri and paste it in the Wichian Buri district and create sub-heading before the reference? I'm really sorry for making a lot of trouble lately but I really do not familiar with wikipedia and it's my first time creating the article and it quite difficult for me to understand progress of the wikipedia. :( Bjj dev (talk) 07:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes, you just need to
 * copy over the content + citations to just before the "References" section (the last section)
 * add a section heading
 * change Grilled Chicken of Wichian Buri ( Grilled Chicken of Wichian Buri ) to Grilled Chicken of Wichian Buri
 * and you should be good. I'll double-check, though.08:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

I have already added all the content and citations into Wichian Buri District article and what do I have to do with the article of "Grilled Chicken of Wichian Buri"? Bjj dev (talk) 17:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Nothing, I made an update to Articles for deletion/Grilled Chicken of Wichian Buri. Nothing should be done until the AfD is closed.–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Clarence Winthrop Bowen
Dear CaroleHenson, I created this article Clarence Winthrop Bowen and I was working with user Mabalu to improve it. I was following their suggestion to add references and changing the image of the spouse, Roxana, see her talk page, when Magnolia677 started to revert my edits, in this way also removing the improvements requested by Mabalu. In the end, Magnolia677 put all images above, and sincerely I do not like it. The images I found are related to specific sections: one is the main portrait, one is the spouse and it goes at the sentence about the marriage and one is for the career and it goes to that section. Moreover I do not like that Magnolia677 uprighted the portrait of the wife, it's not necessary and it's visually strange in comparison to the other two pictures. This is an article I created and would like to manage in a different way. May I do it in some way? is there a specific reason why I have to accept this layout that is not nice? --Elisa.rolle (talk) 12:50, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Additional info. I was exchanging this topic with Mabalu:
 * Elisa:I found a better quality for the wedding photo, I uploaded it on wikimedia and linked the page. I left the portrait on the wikipedia article.--Elisa.rolle (talk) 12:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Mabalu: Elisa.rolle, nice find! Can you update the file description to show where you found the image as it is no longer your "own work"? Mabalu (talk) 12:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Magnolia677 removed the link to the wikimedia since they do not like as it appears. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 12:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)


 * , I am sorry, I missed this. Has this been worked out since you posted this? If not, what is it you're wanting me to do?–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)


 * CaroleHenson, I found the Wikipedia policy that said that putting all photos far from their reference is to be discouraged and moreover, I improved the article with the infobox for person therefore it was even more "bad"; I therefore moved back the two pictures (bride and career) to the right place, but I left the upright for the portrait: with the new layout is not so bad. I'm sorry if this will upset Magnolia677, but the previous layout was bad for many reason, and this is an article I created therefore I do not want to accept and editing that is against my wishes AND against Wikipedia policy. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 21:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * by the way, like another user we well know, it seems this user as well is following the "Ignore Rules" policy. I'm fine if I'm adding something to an article that maybe they created and/or are managing, but accepting this approach and attitude in an article I created is not something I can agree. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 21:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)


 * , I don't know enough of the specifics to say that the user is following "Ignore all rules" - sometimes there are competing rules. I think that the current layout looks nice. I know it's hard when you're frustrated, but if it's possible to step back and assume good faith. Most of the time, people make edits because they believe they are making it better. You two just have a difference of opinion in what "better" means. I've not seen your edit reverted, so hopefully things will smooth out.–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Dexta Daps
Ok tanx..Am working on Kranium..His an artist newly signed to Atlantic Records,,he has a hit track Know body has to know. Sshhaaxx (talk) 09:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Kranium
Hi check out my new article Kranium hes signed to Atlantic Records and has a top chart song.

Am still improving the Dexta Daps article gradually. tanx Sshhaaxx (talk) 07:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok.–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Peer review/Nuclear weapon/archive1
You are invited to join the discussion at Peer review/Nuclear weapon/archive1. Cheers, Friy Man talk 18:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * , This isn't a topic that I feel comfortable giving a thorough review... perhaps someone with military / weapons knowledge will weigh in. I'll wait and if not, I do have general comments for improvement - which are essentially the kind of items you'd find in a WP:GA checklist.–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of places named Cheyenne for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of places named Cheyenne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of places named Cheyenne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of places named Cheyenne for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of places named Cheyenne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of places named Cheyenne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


 * As I have mentioned in several places: Regarding Cheyenne (disambiguation) and this page - there were long discussions about the disambiguation pages, including and culminating in this one. Including the List of places page.––CaroleHenson (talk) 22:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Companies and Organizations in Nairobi
I do have reliable sources for the company. Things like sites with company profile and articles published by bloggers.

I checked out a few companies and used them as templates to develop this as the first wiki page.

This is a major organization in Kenya and have clear knowledge about the company, so I decided to start with them. Once I know through the process would like to add other major companies in the country.

i have seen a lot of wikipedia pages for companies in Kenya which consist of one line and are still approved. I dont understand why? Could there be any reason towards it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deassismoneira (talk • contribs) 20:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I don't know what companies you're talking about but if editors find that there are lots of reliable sources, for me this is particularly if there are news or other sources from Find sources search engines -- or if the company meets WP:ORG guidelines -- then it's not questioned the same way as if it's hard to find news and other reliable sources. There are also a lot of articles that have yet to be reviewed, there are a lot of articles written every day and they go into a big queue - and it may be that the articles you're talking about haven't been reviewed yet.
 * I don't know what companies you're talking about but if editors find that there are lots of reliable sources, for me this is particularly if there are news or other sources from Find sources search engines -- or if the company meets WP:ORG guidelines -- then it's not questioned the same way as if it's hard to find news and other reliable sources. There are also a lot of articles that have yet to be reviewed, there are a lot of articles written every day and they go into a big queue - and it may be that the articles you're talking about haven't been reviewed yet.


 * If you would like to write articles that you'd feel pretty confident that they will remain, it's important to look over WP:Reliable sources and WP:Notability.


 * Do you have some companies, other than that one that was deleted, that you're interested in writing about that we could check for sources and reliability?–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add article on 'Shafeeq Gigyani'
Dear sir, Last week you have contributed in an article with the name of *Shafeeq Gigyani - Education and Peace Activist / founder Poha . Now that was removed by someone. Can you please add that article again, You can easily take citation from above news.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.255.6.67 (talk • contribs)


 * No, the article was deleted due to the Articles for deletion/Shafeeq Gigyani discussion.–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:56, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Favorite Kitten is here to thank you for all your excellent work lately!!! kthxbai

— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC) 


 * Thanks, love the kitten!–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:33, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to the Guild! ツ
Dear Carole; It's a real pleasure to welcome you to the Guild of Copy Editors, where you belong! I'm sure we can continue to expect great things from your contributions. With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 08:34, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks,

Cragmor
Today marks 9 years in Japan and begins my 10th. Homesick. Would you consider writing an article on Cragmor as you have Ivywild and Papeton? Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:55, 5 May 2017 (UTC)


 * , It's possible. Want to help find info and sources?–CaroleHenson (talk) 06:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * On it! My sources will all be online though, the nearest English library is Guam... My notes will be at User:Kintetsubuffalo/workshop/Cragmor Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:50, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * , Ok, sounds good. Do you mind if I post sources there, too?–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Great, thank you and good night from Japan!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. Good night.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:25, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Wrongly deleting my userpage;Citing G3 as reason when the "G"s only apply to mainspace
You used your CSD module and speedy deleted my userpage [] , using G3 as reasoning. G3 only applies to Mainspace articles, not userpages. Doing that was in good faith, but I was using that userpage for testing purposes and was never intending to make it a mainspace article. I would like the delete to be reverted. 5tr5 (talk) 17:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * CaroleHenson did not delete it, and she cannot restore it. Administrator RHaworth deleted it, and you can take it up with them. BTW G3 applies to pages in ANY namespace, not just articles. That's why the abbreviation uses a G (for general), not an A (for article). --MelanieN (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * , If you think that "University of Colorado Colorado Springs Future 2018 April fools day" page should be returned, see WP:REFUND. As an FYI, due to the nature of the page, if it is restored, it is likely to get deleted again.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

It was not just any userspace article, it was a sandbox. 5tr5 (talk) 18:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Replied to this in much the same vein on RH's talk. It's TGIF, etc., which is why I'm not linking to WP:ADMINSHOP. Oops, I did it again :D  &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  18:25, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Please see MelanieN's comment.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks, and Morgan Hebard
Wow. The page you made out of my proto-page for MH was exactly what I was inclined to eventually produce, but it probably would have taken me weeks to get it into the shape you put it in over night! Thank you so much. Do you do that sort of thing all the time, or do you have a particular enthusiasm for this subject? I was a little surprised there wasn't any page for him given his contributions to entomology, but what you compiled goes into more about him than I was even figuring on and he was my grandfather! Thanks again! Perrydigm (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi ,
 * I found it when I was reviewing items in the Special:NewPagesFeed. It looked like an article that should be in Wikipedia and I was trying to prove notability. It seems that there is a lot that can be added to the article about his career, travel, and military service.
 * It would be good if you took a look at WP:COI, since you've identified that he was your grandfather. Even though one intends to be objective, it's so easy for bias and original research (i.e., information that you know that may not be published by a secondary source) that it's good to have someone make the actual additions to the article.
 * You could, though, copy this to your sandbox and work on it and then submit request edits on Talk:Morgan Hebard when you've got the information fleshed out. (As an aside, I don't know if he's your father or uncle (I'm guessing those are the choices), but it also interesting that Morgan Hebard, Jr. was a naturalist and with the OSS during WWII. I'm not sure if there's enough to establish notability for him, but I am sure it's an interesting story.)
 * Anyway, if I can help, please let me know.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:42, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi , Maybe I misunderstood. I had the idea/impression that YOU added the links and original research and that you had already just approved it. I actually never knew him and don't have any "special sources". His notability isn't about his story. It's about his major contributions to entomology, classifying multiple species and genuses (genii?) and I thought the multiple links you already added indicated that. As I said, I wasn't even figuring on going into his personal life as much as you have already documented. It just seemed to me that the multiple references to the insects he discovered, named or classified should have a page to link to. I'm also rather a newbie (in case you couldn't tell) so I'm not clear exactly how to "copy this to your sandbox and work on it and then submit request edits on Talk:Morgan Hebard". You've already been a great deal of help, but I guess I need a bit more in the basic instruction department. Perrydigm (talk) 01:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, sorry to cause confusion.


 * I reviewed the article and marked it reviewed, meaning that I didn't think anyone else needed to review it. There may be others, though, that come along and think that more information is needed to establish notability, based upon WP:Notability (people) or WP:GNG. I don't think it's a big concern, but anything else that establishes the extent to which he has influenced his field is good.


 * In terms of next steps, you could work on the article in your sandbox. If you would like, I would be happy to copy the article there for you. Then, you could work on the article there - and if you let me know when you have changes ready to post, I could post them for you.


 * Another option is that you could just write up and cite what you'd like to add and enter a request edit for the talk page. There is more information at Edit requests. Basically, you would just copy in what you'd like to add or modify to the article, with citations, to the talk page and add the edit request template.


 * Does that make sense?–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:28, 13 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I have thought about what you said and there's another route. How about if you make changes directly to the article and I'll just keep an eye out and I'll update the date the page has been reviewed on the talk page notice. And, then, if an issue comes up and we need to look at going the sandbox or request edit route, we can tackle it then?–CaroleHenson (talk) 13:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I have thought about what you said and there's another route. How about if you make changes directly to the article and I'll just keep an eye out and I'll update the date the page has been reviewed on the talk page notice. And, then, if an issue comes up and we need to look at going the sandbox or request edit route, we can tackle it then?–CaroleHenson (talk) 13:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

That sounds excellent CaroleHenson. I honestly don't have much to add to what you already did! I'll look for more citations and encomiums and bear in mind avoiding any possible appearance of bias and if somebody questions it or if you think I've erred, I will be prepared to bow to others' judgement...
 * Perrydigm (talk) 23:28, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
Dear Carole, Thank you for the edits and contributions. I am relatively new to writing on Wikipedia and so I am figuring my way around. The purpose in revision was to make it as original as possible. I may add new information to it over time. Rohit. Graduate Assistant, CRS Center, Texas A&M University. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohit4th (talk • contribs) 03:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Great, and thanks for catching some edits in William Wayne Caudill!


 * As an FYI, if you add ~ after you finish typing a message on a talk page, it will automatically format a signature line with your name and date and time stamp when you save the page, as my signature line is applied here. Otherwise, someone needs to follow you and apply the signature.–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Auguste Vianesi
Thank you for reviewing Maestro Vianesi, but "I will not eat green eggs and ham!" >MinorProphet (talk) 15:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)


 * , My pleasure. I am not sure if there's a special meaning regarding green eggs and ham, but I'm with you.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)


 * There is no special meaning regarding anything at all, except regarding numbers, whose meaning is utterly clear and unarguable. "Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers are simple." Dr. Seuss. It just depends on your point of view. Have you read The Phantom Tollbooth, by Norton Juster? >MinorProphet (talk) 00:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Ahhhh! I didn't make the connection, I totally forgot about my quote.


 * I read the article about the book, sounds like an absolutely must-read. Thanks!–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

reversion?
Hi Carole! Just wondering why you reverted this edit. -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)


 * , Because you were naming two different fact sheets with the same name (see url and title):
 * your edit:


 * original citation: –CaroleHenson (talk) 14:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks! But I'm still confused; as far as I can tell, I didn't change the URL or the title. I just removed the "name" field from the ref tag. Here's the diff. If I diff from my change to your final change, the only difference is that you decided to change the name of the ref tag, rather than just remove it. What am I missing? -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:53, 2 May 2017 (UTC)


 * , Ah.... the lightbulb went on! Sorry about that!


 * Well, we're still good - in the next edit, I had renamed it (thinking it was a second instance of dupe-naming) to differentiate it from the other fact sheet.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Great! No worries -- I'm just trying to make sure I didn't do anything wrong or disruptive. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Anneke Lucas
Hello, We kindly ask you to remove the redirect of Anneke Lucas' page because she has to have her own page. More links about her, and new developments: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/new-york-assemblywoman-teams-advocate-eradicate-human-trafficking-hotels-n733496 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/16/nyregion/bill-seeks-to-enlist-new-york-hotels-to-help-fight-sex-trafficking.html http://gothamist.com/2017/04/17/anneke_lucas_sex_trafficking.php Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by GretaIndie (talk • contribs) 20:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Osborne Association logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Osborne Association logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks, it looks like someone loaded a newer, different logo for the article about this organization, so I added to the article, asking for the article's deletion.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Question about COI editing
Hey Carole, hope you're well. I was curious about where to draw the line when refraining from making a direct edit to an article I have a paid COI on. Generally, I abstain from doing so, especially with actual changes to the text, but there are instances such as this one where I've been encouraged to edit directly, or small wiki-code things, like this little edit. Would changes and fixes like these be generally acceptable? I realize that everyone is going to have a different answer, but I'd appreciate your opinion on the matter.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 01:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)


 * , I think the best good-faith approach for adhering to the COI guideline would be to post a request edit, announcing that you're a paid editor - as you've been doing. That's my take.


 * If you have had a request sitting, though, on the talk page for a while (more than a few days), then go ahead and make the change -- with comment / update on the talk page. As you know, the more that you're making changes that have an objective tone and with reliable, independent and secondary sources, the better.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Kranium
Hi.. I have added some new links concerning the things you told me to do. Pls how do i get some attention to the article? Sshhaaxx (talk) 11:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

About becoming an administrator - ORCP
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia so far; they are very much appreciated. Your experience and tenure have been an asset to the project.

You should consider starting another poll in ~6 months to see what your chances are.

To receive feedback on your chances of successfully requesting administrative privileges, consider starting a poll:


 * Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

Thank you!  J 947 (c)  22:46, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * LOL! Hi, Carole. I think this was a semi-canned invitation, without knowing your history. But I'm delighted to know you are on their radar, and I look forward to your next outing! --MelanieN (talk) 22:48, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I do know that she took an RfA recently.  J 947 (c)  22:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You do. OK, good. Maybe a little more personalized notice would have been appropriate, then, rather than "Have you ever thought of becoming an administrator?" I don't mean to be critical, I know that you and the others at the project are doing your best to recruit new admins. But as Carole will tell you, she is working on it and she has some nominators lined up, eager to help when she is ready to go again. --MelanieN (talk) 22:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for personalizing it! See you at her RfA! --MelanieN (talk) 23:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Let me know if it happens. I wouldn't wish it on anyone but that's your decision. - Sitush (talk) 23:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Oops! To clarify: I am asking to be informed, so it would not constitute canvassing. - Sitush (talk) 23:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note, and for weighing in  and . The poll sounds like a good way to go.–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:48, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sitush, and any interested talk page stalkers: Here's how to be sure you find out about it if someone files for adminship: watchlist Requests for adminship/CaroleHenson 2. --MelanieN (talk) 14:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FND Hope logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:FND Hope logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes, the article has been deleted. I nominated it for deletion, too, with db-G7.–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Mother Marie-Anastasie
Dear Carole, The text was revised by Sister Marie-Theresa, master of the novices from the Convent of Monteils, a great scholar of Mother Marie-Anastasie’s life and work. We don’t have links to all the information, because a lot of them were collected in historical documents of the Congregation. The sources are reliable, because they are from religious people, who lived with Mother Marie-Anastasie or collected information from the sisters’ records. In addition, the images were taken personally, by members of the Congregation of Saint-Rosaire of Monteils, founded by Mother Marie-Anastasie. Therefore, we would like to keep the original essay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosarioteste (talk • contribs) 18:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * , There are too many issues to keep the original article, it took me a period over six hours to clean it up and find sources. See Talk:Mother Marie-Anastasie.


 * If you can provide citations that meet the guidelines, including WP:Verifiability, with information about who published it, when, etc. that would be fine. See Talk:Mother Marie-Anastasie. If you could add notes there with the citation information, that would be great, particularly if you have information about the schools that she opened.


 * There was a bit of content that was also removed due to tone, so I tried to summarize her approach in a paragraph.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Moved content from the bottom of my page to this section, so that the conversation is grouped together:–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Dear Carole,
 * Can we revert the text to the original? Then, we can add all references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosarioteste (talk • contribs) 18:48, 23 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Or, I can pass the original text to you, what do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosarioteste (talk • contribs) 18:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)


 * It is seeming that you are not getting the points about the issues with the content. Did you, by chance, read the Talk:Mother Marie-Anastasie section?


 * If you have sources for the content in Talk:Mother Marie-Anastasie, I would be happy to help you get that formatted and added back to the article.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Se o português é o seu idioma principal, você pode querer olhar para esta página, abrange muitos dos meus pontos. Talvez este resumo escrito em português fará mais sentido.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)



•	Her parents, Joseph Conduché, a shoemaker and devoted Christian, and Marie-Jeanne Artières. •	Her mother's uncle her uncle, Jean-Pierre Gavalda, priest of Bor and her nephew, Jean-François Gavalda who used to work with him.
 * We consulted the letters from Mother Marie-Anastasie. Organization: Mesquita, Martha Maria Amaral (2010). Letters from Mother Anastasie. Congregation of the Dominicans of Monteils.
 * This is not a reliable, secondary source.–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

•	Her parent had six children, but only two of their daughters survived – Alexandrine and Joséphine.[citation needed] Alexandrine Conduché, the oldest, was educated at home by her parents until the age of four. After that, she went to Compeyre School. Shortly after, her parents transferred her to a school in the neighboring parish in Aguessac, followed by the Union Sisters.
 * We consulted the documentation located in the convent of Bor.
 * This does not seem to be a reliable, secondary source. Was this published somewhere?–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

•	Since she was a little girl, Conduché showed a great interest in knowing the life of the saints and she used to spend a long time reading about them. At eleven years old she made her first communion. •	she was pulled out of school to care for her sick mother and take care of the household. Her father didn’t have a job, and the family experienced a difficult period of poverty.
 * The information was obtained in an interview with Sister Doraci (a member of the Dominican community), granted to the researcher Miriam Ferreira.
 * This does not seem to be a reliable, secondary source. Was this published somewhere?–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

•	From 1863 to 1878, Mother Marie-Anastasie opened 17 new school communities: Le Mauron (1863), Saint-Hippolyte (1866), Notre Dame de Laval (1867), Lescure (1867), Prades (1867), Puech-Auriol (1868), Tayac (1868), Saint-Hilaire de Rodez (1868), Beteille (1869), Floirac (1870), Montgey (1870), Venès (1872), Saint-Laurent (1874), Lalo (1875), Artigues (1876), Villevayre (1877).
 * We consulted the documentation located in the convent of Bor.
 * This does not seem to be a reliable, secondary source. Was this published somewhere?–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Can we revert the text to the original? Then, we can add all references. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosarioteste (talk • contribs)


 * You seem to be ignoring all the issues with the original text. I have thought about tagging the Spanish and Portuguese articles due to all the issues.–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Please sign your messages with ~ . All you need to do is type the four tildes before you save, and like magic, your signature, links, date and time stamp will be added when you save. Thanks!–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Hello ,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just reviews, the  backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Changing article titles
Hi Carole, hope you're doing well. I was wondering if you could help point me in the right direction about changing the title of an article. I know it's no easy task, but in looking at Peter Hancock (CEO), it doesn't seem to make much sense for the article title to refer to him as CEO, now that he is no longer CEO of AIG. I made an inquiry on the talk page but it never gained any traction, or was just otherwise overlooked. Any advice on how to proceed?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 19:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi ,
 * Makes sense.
 * I see that his name is more often "Peter Hancock" vs. "Peter D. Hancock", as suggested on the talk page. How about Peter Hancock (businessman)?–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I think that's a great solution. How would we move forward from here?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 23:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

communities
its rather sad that i cant leave references for the populations. but the site neighbourhood statistics has closed, i had wrote them all down ages ago. but because the site has closed EVERY population figure for places in wales now has a dead link. so what are you going to do delete all the population figures? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattcymru2 (talk • contribs)


 * , I don't know what you're talking about. I removed the population number in the infobox of Llandyssil here because 1) it's different from what is in the initial paragraph and 2) from this edit of Abermule with Llandyssil, said in the edit summary that the 1527 population was for that community and not the village of Llandyssil.


 * Is that what you're talking about?–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Request for adoption
I am new and would like to be adopted. I am also interested in history and good articles.

Thank you.Henia Perlman (talk) 04:59, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi . Great! Do you have a topic that you're interested in writing about now? Or, articles that you'd like to contribute to?


 * You may be interested in joining some WikiProjects like WikiProject History.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:09, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for adoption
I am editing The Holocaust (I taught it for almost 20 years and I am retired and Western Civ. ) and some are complaining that I don't know the rules of wiki, don't know how to cite ...

If The Holocaust leaves me time, I would love to contribute toWikipedia:WikiProject History - I have always cared very much in history and been involved in curriculum development of history.

Thank you so much!Henia Perlman (talk) 15:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Ok, after I finish something I'm working on, I will take a look at your edits and messages on your talk page... and post a message there.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much. Some editors are starting to loose patience with me.Henia Perlman (talk) 22:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * , My pleasure. Folks are generally very receptive to people who reach out for help. And, if we work together on the next set of edits before they are added to the article, that should be a good thing.


 * I added comments to two sections in your talk page - and added a new one "Next?" to see what you'd like to work on. We can chat there and work together on your sandbox page on any changes or new content.–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks anyhow, . I'm not sure what they wanted, but it doesn't look like I was the kind of mentor he/she was looking for.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm about to tear my hair out. Seriously. We need to get away from the insane numbers of quotes in that article (it's on the plan after verifying) but.... I hate to look like I'm biting a newbie all the time. Plus, it's eating my energy for actual article improvements. Suggestions? I'm not always the best person to greet newbie editors, I do tend to be a bit perfectionist. Ealdgyth - Talk 00:23, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * , I think that the issue is that the person is very well informed about the subject and wants to share all that he/she knows, but may not have experience writing encyclopedia articles - particularly ones that are already quite long and new additions need to be concise, meaningful, and subject to guidelines.


 * Personally, I think that there have been a number of edit summary and talk discussions about changes. If it was me, and I had already communicated about disruptive editing, I would add a disruptive edit warning to their talk page.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Irondome offered at my talk page to help, I dropped him a note. We'll see if he has more luck. I generally try to AGF... Ealdgyth - Talk 00:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Sounds good.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:32, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Uh...
Was I supposed to revert the Holocaust edit? Sorry - making dinner so hadn't gotten around to it. Had hopes she might engage and try to understand.... (plus, I'm starving...) Ealdgyth - Talk 23:26, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * , Yes, if you could revert edits that are unhelpful, that would be good. I thought you had already, but I just saw that someone else did it.


 * I am hoping that this might help her understand, without having lots of repetitive conversation. I saw that she's reading the copyright guidelines, so that's a start.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:44, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

thank you!
Thanks for your Barnstar and your help with the St. Augustine's article. It is easy not to see your own mistakes! There is still a little bit more work to do on it. I was at the library yesterday, fact checking! There is a celebration of Luther sites on the 4th of June, that's why I've been spending so much time on it. Cheers Felixkrater (talk) 09:26, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , Great, you've done a nice job. If there's any way I can help, let me know.–CaroleHenson (talk) 13:44, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * It was my pleasure, . Thanks for the barnstar!–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Hampden Clement Blamire Moody
Hello, thank you very much for your edits on the page Hampden Clement Blamire Moody, especially for the new information! (TrevelyanLittle (talk) 14:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)) TrevelyanLittle (talk) 14:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, it was my pleasure. He sounds like a very interesting person. I wish I could find more.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Henia, mentorship

 * Carole, I have formally offered to WP:Mentor H. I have asked her to run any future proposed edits by me on my talkpage first, so I can check them, see what relevance they have, wording, supporting refs etc. Hopefully this will head off any escalations in the future. Irondome (talk) 17:54, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * , I truly hope that works. I haven't seen comments from you recently, so I thought you had enough.


 * In the meantime, there's an issue at Talk:German-occupied Europe, again where more content is being added without citations.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I've been watching Carole. I want to see how she responds to the offer first. I just don't want thinks to get out of hand.. Simon. Irondome (talk) 18:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Ok. I am confused about this whole thing.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Carole, I just think we are 'misdiagnosing' H. here. Clear WP:CIR and if I can get her to slow down, give me notice on what articles she is working on, and present edits in draft form for oversight, I think we can fix this. It's just gotta be dealt with as a package. It this point the mentoring proposal is informal, she needs to agree to it, and it does not have community agreement, but we wanna keep her off the boards. Simon Irondome (talk) 18:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Should we see if she has comments about my draft?–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Yeah. That would be a good little exercise. Irondome (talk) 18:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Ok. Cool.–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank You Msg.
Hi Corole, {Dont take me wrong. whats the problem with you, i just said u to verify my article, and our temple is landing in second place in India. in and in religious organisation too, hindu temple etc lot more after shiridi. and coming to wiki most of my articles to where deleted wasn'nt said whats the issue for deleting eg : on working with formula, working on link , not working continuously nor what , u guys just delete in same manner. now too ur giving me righs with name nothing must be posted what the heak. and most my offcial links where deleted with this name , check out.. Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Mandir, Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Temple, Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba}. {and with this had asked u admin access too, u hadnt much. and google access updating link onto it, no reply on to it.}

{i lost lots of my access changing no let me comeup with other with wiki wasted 1 week with this let us grow up putted my temple details all stuff but changed link to link, lot of stuff and with this  final result , now with you. and asked you me back those backup above links but didnt}.

{I would let u know another, within some day, you would only come to us to request us to assign those again , in 4 article on same name 2 from some one 2 from u other now  as u deleted assigned one. not required to link the article here}. {and i would let u know other just google u would more about us, what are we and all temple etc how its all started with details Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Mandir. now i had to go to temple to update sticker but no use we are on wiki}.pranerao--praneeth rao 20:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks Praneethrao — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pranerao (talk • contribs) 20:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Request and finalizing.
Hi Carole ,

{from past 1 week we are looking to come up with this temple article, but on the (talk page ), without our knowledge most of the articles gets deleted , dont know whats the issue , just contacted talk page too, they just  delete it , with this my official name of my temple too i lost aricle name  on wiki and} {and with this you had given me a *notice as nothing on this name or article must be posted not this user or any user must not create this article  whats the big deal. as u got my backup of my email, and every files like google, trip advisor history etc, just check whats this temple whats the things i had updated in WIkI etc. just look down. all}

{what i updated as temple article i could not get back as  article. its not 1 or 2 its 4 article. requested just get me back, the same article name nope no response , On talk page people someone goes with deletion. i would ask them whats issue nope, nothing they response on article name : Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Mandir, Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Temple , Mandyada Shri Shiradi Sai Baba Mandir , Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba} , {and we requested just get us at least this two articles which u had deleted nor names ill make articles again, when i reload  nothing and no response on talk page. Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Mandir, Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Temple}

{on this user, and if u do require us to submit temple doc's , kindly let us }.

{nor let us know, dont use our services , any more. it would be great. because what ever articles till now i had updated on this name has been deleted , and i would tell you other thing this temple, landing in 2nd in India after shiridi in India, in temple dashina kannada karnataka mandya. sai baba temple}

{On wiki just to let u know on which user. my user name : pranerao : full name praneeth rao} praneeth rao 19:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

thanks praneeth rao — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pranerao (talk • contribs) 19:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Message 1
Hi mam, . and make our page active   pranerao--praneeth rao 17:50, 24 June 2017 (UTC) [] thanks , Praneeth Rao.


 * I am sorry,, but I am having a very hard time understanding what you're trying to say. I think you're mentioning that the name of the village should be B.Gowdagere. After that, I am not sure what your point is. It is likely that this is a moot point, though, unless you can give a compelling reason why the article should remain... after many failed attempts to create such an article.


 * Also, please see the comments that I left you regarding responding to talk pages at Talk:Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Temple. It's been very hard to follow your comments. –CaroleHenson (talk) 19:14, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Message 2

 * Getting rid of deletion page

Hi mam, . and make our page active   {db-hoax}}pranerao--praneeth rao 17:53, 24 June 2017 (UTC) [] thanks , Praneeth Rao.


 * , I am not sure why you posted what appears to be a duplicate message... except for the mention of db-hoax, which is not relevant here.


 * As a side comment, it is not my role to clean-up after your editing issues. I reverted the edit you made - that also included other edits - because it is very inappropriate for you to remove the tags for speedy deletion of an article that you created. I had already commented... and it was mentioned on your user talk page, too... that the process is to contest the deletion on the talk page by adding a message there.


 * Please feel free to make the edit to the village, if you think that is more appropriate. From the sources and map, it looked like gejjalagere was more appropriate.–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Message 3

 * page deleting error after updating details. forwading again msg

Hi Mam, . as we got this as only one plus to get in and as we shared our files through social network and etc. and printed in Visiting card If not work on the same name village ,and make me to get rid of deletion, and if u do need our temple docs and any proof i would do so just get me back.. it would be great rather am getting into this problem and situation and sequence And thanks for previous msg and and mentioning about db-hoax}}praneraopraneeth rao 20:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks Praneeth rao


 * 1. I am confused, you changed it to Gejjalagere in this edit.
 * 2. I cannot do anything about the speedy deletion notice, but since I have explained several times how to contest the deletion, I posted a message for you on the article talk page with this edit.
 * 3. You may have other documents, but what are needed are reliable published sources, like books, newspapers, and magazines, for instance. I have already mentioned this several times.
 * 4. I am not sure what the rest of the points are.
 * Please don't message me again. Add a message to the article talk page, please. That is where the messages should be posted.–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Gort my page speedy deletion
Hi mam ,

. --praneeth rao 15:51, 24 June 2017 (UTC)pranerao []

thanks praneeth rao — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pranerao (talk • contribs) 15:51, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


 * , I am sorry, but I don't disagree with the reason for the speedy deletion. There's hardly any reliable sources to prove notability as I mentioned somewhere - your talk page or the article talk page - or maybe both.


 * If you disagree with the tagging of the article, though, you can contest the deletion on the article talk page: Talk:Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Temple.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you!
Carole, thank you so much for editing my article. I added the BP/sources by mistake because I had not done articles in a long time. I still need to add more to this article because this person was the reason why ROGG was stopped it was multimillion dollar project to build a road on the Everglades. I will keep adding more. Thanks LisD 12:05, 24 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisdip1 (talk • contribs)


 * Ok, great!


 * Regarding signing, if for some reason the tilde (~) is not on your keyboard (it's to the left of the "1" on my keyboard), there's a wikimarkup for it on the "Insert" menu selection in the edit window, just below where you type your message in edit mode.–CaroleHenson (talk) 12:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Training on how to add a new wikipedia page
Hey, we talked earlier on regarding the bioCard page which seemed to get speedy deletion. I wanted to ask you why does that violate and how can i make a page to avoid those problems which have been raise. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deassismoneira (talk • contribs) 22:51, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi ,


 * I don't remember the specifics, but from your talk page, it looks like there were not sufficient reliable sources, which in itself is an issue. Or, it could have been notability. Sometimes such cases get tagged as promotional articles.


 * I highly recommend looking at Your first article. It has a lot of great advice.


 * I got an edit conflict and see that you added kenbro industries ltd or chandaria industries or comcraft group as potential other companies from Kenya or Nairobi that you want to write about. I can help you see if we can find sufficient sources, perhaps using the Find sources tool.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


 * It looks like Chandaria Industries and Comcraft Group are much more likely to be viable articles of the three and have at least one existing Wikipedia article to link to it.


 * For sources, one of the steps in Your first article, here are links to queries:


 * –CaroleHenson (talk) 23:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Companies and Organizations in Nairobi
You can check out kenbro industries ltd or chandaria industries or comcraft group — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deassismoneira (talk • contribs) 23:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)