User talk:Carole Basinger

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carole Basinger (December 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carole Basinger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Carole Basinger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Carole_Basinger Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Carole_Basinger reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Robert McClenon, at what point may I move my article from my Sandbox into the Draft Space/ Thank you for your help. I have been working to improve it, but it is not quite ready yet. Thank you for your help! Zuzuroo (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carole Basinger (December 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carole Basinger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Carole Basinger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Carole_Basinger Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Carole_Basinger reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:45, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi KylieTastic! I completed the article in my Sandbox, and beleive I moved it into Draft. What did I do wrong? Please help, and Thank You! Zuzuroo (talk)

How to write articles that won't be rejected
If you're going to write an article about anyone or anything that is not you or something you are connected to, here are the steps you should follow:
 * 1) Choose a topic whose notability is attested by discussions of it in several reliable independent sources.
 * 2) Gather as many professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources you can find. Google Books is a good resource for this.  Also, while search engine resutls are tnot sources, they are where you can find sources.  Just remember that they need to be professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources.
 * 3) Focus on just the ones that are not dependent upon or affiliated with the subject, but still specifically about the subject and providing in-depth coverage (not passing mentions). If you do not have at least three such sources, the subject is not yet notable and trying to write an article at this point will only fail.
 * 4) Summarize those sources left after step 3, adding citations at the end of them. You'll want to do this in a program with little/no formatting, like Microsoft Notepad or Notepad++, and not in something like Microsoft Word or LibreOffice Writer.  Make sure this summary is just bare statement of facts, phrased in a way that even someone who hates the subject can agree with.
 * 5) Combine overlapping summaries (without arriving at new statements that no individual source supports) where possible, repeating citations as needed.
 * 6) Paraphrase the whole thing just to be extra sure you've avoided any copyright violations or plagiarism.
 * 7) Use the Article wizard to post this draft and wait for approval.
 * 8) Expand the article using sources you put aside in step 3 (but make sure they don't make up more than half the sources for the article, and make sure that affiliated sources don't make up more than half of that).

Doing something besides those steps typically results in the article not being approved, or even in its deletion.

If you are writing about yourself, or someone or something you are connected with (such as a friend, family member, or your business), the following steps are different:
 * 1) If the subject really was notable, you wouldn't need to write the article. Remember that articles are owned by the Wikipedia community as a whole, not the article subject or the article author.  If you do not want other people to write about you, then starting an article about yourself is a bad idea.
 * 8a) If the article is accepted, never edit it again. Instead, make edit requests on the article's talk page.
 * 8b) If the article is rejected, there will be a reason given. Read it carefully and closely.  If there are links in the reason, open them and read those pages.

Ian.thomson (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Referencing
In your draft you seem to be struggling with the referencing, so try reading WP:Referencing for beginners. --David Biddulph (talk) 20:47, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Rosenworcel (February 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brian Rosenworcel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brian Rosenworcel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Brian_Rosenworcel Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Legacypac&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Brian_Rosenworcel reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 10:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, User:Legacypac and thank your for reviewing my article for submission, Draft:Brain Rosenworcel. The reason it was declined, was that you stated it did not meet notability for the individual. I did review the Notability guidelines, and found that Brian Rosenworcel does meet this criteria, at the very least, under the following guidelines: 4. Has had a record certified Gold in at least one country (I have corrected the Satellite (Guster song) to link with the page indicating that the single reached Gold status on April 18, 2018). 6. Is in an ensemble that contains two or more notable musicians (the other two founding members of the band Adam Gardner and Ryan Miller (musician) have pages and are deemed notable).

Also, under composers and lyricists: 1. Has credit for lyrics or music writing for a notable composer or composition. Brain Rosenworcel is credited on the album Ganging Up on the Sun for writing the lyrics for Satellite.

I truly appreciate your help to successfully achieve publication of this article! Zuzuroo (talk) 17:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Brian Rosenworcel has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Brian Rosenworcel. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 19:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Rosenworcel (May 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brian Rosenworcel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brian Rosenworcel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Brian_Rosenworcel Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Brian_Rosenworcel reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse
Hi, as per my email the teahouse can be found here. Thanks. Nightfury 15:12, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Reconsideration for Publication of Article Hello! I have submitted my article Draft:Brian Rosenworcel for Publication on three separate occasions. Each time, I have improved the article in attempt to meet the Wikipedia guidelines. My subject is a member of a band, Guster. All band members past and present, with the exception of my subject, have an individual article, as does the band. The most recent declination was due to Notability of my subject. I have scrutinized the Wikipedia Notabilty critera for musicians and composers, and feel that my subject meets the criteria for the following reasons: 1) "Has demonstrated individual notability for activity independent of the band." My subject both produced and performed on a successful record for the band Sam Champion, entitled "Slow Rewind."  This record received praise from three major music magazines, including Rolling Stone and Spin. 2) My subject and his band Guster received "a record certified gold in at least one county" for their single "Satellite." 3) "Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition" My subject is credited as the main lyricist for the certified gold record "Satellite." 4)  My subject has "more than a brief mention" in the book "Shadows Bright As Glass," which was written by Pulitzer-Prize finalist Amy Ellis Nutt. I have challenged the declination to the editor who most recently declined the article, but have been notified that they have retired. I was then passed to another editor who states that they can not help me with this, and has sent me back to Teahouse. How do I get another editor to take a second look at this, outside of re-submitting it, waiting 3-4 months only to be told that Notability has not been met, regardless of my above examples? Many thanks for your help and consideration Zuzuroo (talk) 16:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)