User talk:Carolinebonner/Snow bunting/Daniazevedo02 Peer Review

1.	First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? 1.	The article does a good job of explaining the behavior of the birds.

2.	What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? 1.	I would recommend that the author add more information on the effects of climate change. This would be an improvement because it is one of the shortest sections of the article and is not described in very much detail.

3.	What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? 1.	The most important thing the author can do is add information on climate change with reliable sources.

4.	Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? If so, what? 1.	No.

5.	Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? Specifically, does the information they are adding to the article make sense where they are putting it? 1.	The sections are organized well. However, it is unclear where the new information will be added.

6.	Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? 1.	Nothing seems unnecessary or off-topic, and each section’s length is proportional to its importance.

7.	Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? 1.	No.

8.	Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y." 1.	No.

9.	Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? 1.	Yes, most statements in the article are connected to a reliable source.

10.	Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view. 1.	No, the article’s sources seem well balanced. However, the references in the added paragraph need to be more clearly defined for which sentence they correspond to.

11.	Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately! 1.	The statements in the new paragraph are unsourced. Daniazevedo02 (talk) 01:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)