User talk:Carolinecurtis

9th Elsewhere
"Articles which merely include an external link and a brief description of its contents will also be either cleaned up to adhere to the neutral point of view or deleted."

"Notability is not judged by Wikipedia editors directly. The inclusion of topics on Wikipedia is a reflection of whether those topics have been included in reliable published works. Other authors, scholars, or journalists have decided whether to give attention to a topic, and in their expertise have researched and checked the information about it. Thus, the primary notability criterion is a way to determine whether "the world" has judged a topic to be notable. This is unrelated to whether a Wikipedia editor personally finds the subject remarkable or worthy."

My comics is judged by 30,000 readers to be notable -and- the wiki was created by them, as well as non fans, objectively, I was not involved. The 9th Elsewhere wiki was not merely an advertisement of a couple of sentences with one external link, it referred to several psychological theory wikis and was mentioned in turn by a few wikis for novels including David Mitchell's #9dream. It met the criteria, please restore it. Carolinecurtis 05:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)Carolinecurtis


 * Hi there Caroline. I went to look at the deletion discussion that took place regarding 9th Elsewhere, but found it to be fairly short. From what I can see on that page, 9th Elsewhere didn't seem meet the notability guidelines for web content and was deleted under the speedy deletion criteria #A7: web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the deleted copy of the article, so I don't have the ability to restore it for you. If you feel that the article does indeed meet the guidelines, you can appeal to have it restored. Lemme know if you need any help doing that and I'll do what I can to help. :) --Brad Beattie (talk) 05:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)