User talk:Carolingfield

Speedy deletion nomination of Assis, Armando V.D.B. On the Cold Big Bang Cosmology. Progress in Physics, 2011, v. 2, 58-63.


A tag has been placed on Assis, Armando V.D.B. On the Cold Big Bang Cosmology. Progress in Physics, 2011, v. 2, 58-63., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E Wing (talk) 03:32, 20 April 2011 (UTC)



A tag has been placed on Assis, Armando V.D.B. On the Cold Big Bang Cosmology. Progress in Physics, 2011, v. 2, 58-63., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Dream out loud (talk) 00:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I have deleted your page again. The underlying problem is that the title is not and can never be an encyclopedia article.  Encyclopedia articles are about things.  The Big Bang theory is a thing.  A magazine can be a thing.  Even a concept like entropy can be a thing.  We can describe it, we can explain it, we can articulate its impact on society, etc.  Most importantly, we can synopsize what other authors have written about it.  Encyclopedias are, by definition, tertiary sources so we must have reliable, independent secondary sources to summarize from.
 * An article citation, however, is not a thing about which we could write. No one will ever write a paper about a citation.  They might write about the subject of the article.  And the citation might itself be a secondary source about some other subject.  It might be appropriate to add the citation to the bottom of an article matching the subject of the paper.  But the citation itself is not a proper encyclopedia topic.  A citation is a kind of link, a cross-reference to that source.  And while indexes of links and cross-references are useful, they are not in and of themselves encyclopedic.  What Wikipedia is not has more on this topic.
 * I hope that makes it clearer. Rossami (talk) 01:46, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Assis, Armando V.D.B. On the Cold Big Bang Cosmology. Progress in Physics, 2011, v. 2, 58-63.


A tag has been placed on Assis, Armando V.D.B. On the Cold Big Bang Cosmology. Progress in Physics, 2011, v. 2, 58-63. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E Wing (talk) 16:10, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Assis, Armando V.D.B. On the Cold Big Bang Cosmology. Progress in Physics, 2011, v. 2, 58-63. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Assis, Armando V.D.B. On the Cold Big Bang Cosmology. Progress in Physics, 2011, v. 2, 58-63. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Assis, Armando V.D.B. On the Cold Big Bang Cosmology. Progress in Physics, 2011, v. 2, 58-63. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. E Wing (talk) 17:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome


Hello, Carolingfield, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who put a certain post on a talk page. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * New contributors' help page | Help
 * Where to ask questions | Frequently asked questions
 * Introduction to Wikipedia | Guide to Wikipedia
 * The simplified ruleset for Wikipedia | Manual of Style
 * Things to work on at Wikipedia
 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Questions, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! TR 21:54, 23 April 2011 (UTC)


 * In particular, you might want to have a look at the notability guidelines. This my help prevent any conflict from escalating. Also, please be aware of the rules against sock- and meat-puppetry. I'm not saying that any of this is happening now, but please be aware of these rules.TR 21:58, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Syrthiss (talk) 18:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Cold big bang
Hi Carol,

I would be happy to have a friendly discussion at the talk page (Talk:Cold Big Bang)) about the material we disagree about. The goal of Wikipedia is to have the editors reach  consensus in such discussions first, then cooperate to write a Wikipedia-worthy article for the main page.    Bm gub2 (formerly User:Bm_gub) 18:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Unorthodox (Cold) Big Bang Cosmology


A tag has been placed on Unorthodox (Cold) Big Bang Cosmology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bm gub2 (formerly User:Bm_gub) 00:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * AnimatedStop.gif really is getting out of control. You seem absolutely obsessed with getting this material onto Wikipedia through any means necessary and without any regard for Wikipedia policies, which have been repeatedly explained to you. I am asking you to please stop doing this. This is the last time you will be asked nicely, if you continue creating pages on this topic without regard for policy you will leave no choice but to block your account. I'd rather it didn't come to that, but the choice is yours. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:58, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Carolingfield, are you the author of this article? Or a close friend of the author?  Why are you so focused on it?  It's a three-week-old upload that no one has ever heard of.  The WP:FRINGE guideline exists specifically because of behavior like yours---someone writes a random paper, decides that it's going to be the hot new thing, and thinks that a Wikipedia page is a good place to start on the road to Stockholm.   It happens every day.
 * In the future, if this indeed becomes a notable, much-talked-about topic among cosmologists, I would suggest that the right place to seek consensus about reintroducing it would be the talk page Talk:Non-standard cosmology.  That's a page that many editors---both fringe science fans and mainstream cosmologists---are watching, and they have experience with Wikipedia's particular norms for giving appropriate weight (see WP:UNDUE) to fringe theories.   You would probably learn something by reading that page, which does fairly summarize some fringe theories.  Why do some fringe theories get included and Assis gets deleted?  Because these other theories are actually very widely discussed, with dozens (plasma cosmology) or hundreds (TeVeS, MOND) of independent articles serving as reliable, third-party sources.   Bm gub2 (formerly User:Bm_gub) 02:07, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)