User talk:CarolynMW

March 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dark matter halo has been reverted. Your edit here to Dark matter halo was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/apr/article/view/14749/10135) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Mentioned
Hello CarolynMW. Your edits have been [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Physics#Access_to_Nature_for_Gravity_edit? mentioned at WT:PHYS]. It's been claimed that you made wikian unsourced change to our Gravity page. It has been said that 'Dynamic Newtonian Advanced gravity' was not mentioned in your proposed source. You may participate in that discussion if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello EdJohnston Thank you for reviewing, the citation. Apologies, their was a second citation that was supposed to accompany this. I accidentally left this out. The citation in Nature was only referencing Mercury's perihelion. Should I submit my change on the Gravity page with the additional citation? Apologies, I'm new to Wikipedia and just getting to ropes with the processes. talk) 16:54, 12 July 2018 (BST)


 * Hi . It would be good to have a wp:secondary source. I assume that the other source is a wp:primary source by the originator of this recent adaptation? In that case an independent secondary source would probably be needed to establish the relevance (wp:DUEness) of the new adaptation. Also be aware of wp:FRINGE. Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 16:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi . The secondary source is The formation of dynamic advanced gravity. The additional line would be "A recent adaptation to Newtonian gravity called Dynamic Newtonian Advanced gravity (DNAg), also accounts accurately for the advance in the perihelion of Mercury of 42.98 arcseconds per century. Perihelion Citation, DNAg citation"- Let me know if you see any issues with this. Thanks - CarolynMW (talk) 13:24, 18 July 2018 (BST)


 * But that is a primary source. Wikipedia needs secondary sources, mentioning the primary source, in order to establish dueness of the subject. - DVdm (talk) 08:14, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft redacted due to copyright infringement
Hi, I have removed the copy you made of a paper titled "The formulation of dynamic Newtonian advanced gravity, DNAg" from Draft:Black hole physics and dark matter modelling as it looks to be a copyright violation. Papers can only be copied if they are published under a compatible license, such as CC-BY. Also "Advances in Black Hole Physics and Dark Matter Modelling of the Galactic Halo" was published under such a license, and so you can copy it as long as attribution is given, (but you did not attribute the author). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:44, 8 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Graeme Bartlett,
 * I am actually publishing the content on behalf of the author, Dr. Andrew Worsley, and I do have permission to do so. The idea was to create a page about DNAg and invite other users to moderate and refine the article.
 * This page is far from complete as Andrew has been travelling. All references will be added before the page is submitted for review and published.

Your draft article, Draft:Black hole physics and dark matter modelling


Hello, CarolynMW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Black hole physics and dark matter modelling".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 07:43, 20 May 2019 (UTC)