User talk:CarolynVan

A tag has been placed on KOGNITIVE MARKETING, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ellbeecee 20:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -- Kinu t /c  21:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. -- Kinu t /c  21:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Kinu t /c  22:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your e-mail
Based on the block log, your account does not appear to be blocked from editing; if I am mistaken, please use the template to request unblock. Instead that page is protected from editing, because of the repeated volume of recreation of the article in a short span of time despite the multiple notices above. You are welcome to request unprotection and/or recreation of the article at deletion review, provided you can assert that the article in that form was not spam. Also, please provide reliable third party sources indicating that the company meets notability guidelines for inclusion (WP:CORP), as this will help your case. -- Kinu t /c  19:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)