User talk:Caront

Spam in Emoze
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Emoze, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Emoze is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Emoze, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Emoze itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of emoze
Hi Alan, As a new Wikipedia fan, and still trying to find my feet around here, I realize that you have deleted the emoze article I submitted.

Please give me a brief explanation of why this was noted to be spam? Emoze is one of the "push email" companies in the global market and I fail to understand the spam with regard to a company background and what the company does as opposed to Blackberry, Seven, Good (motorola) etc.

I would highly appreciate your feedback and assistance.

By the way, I'm an aviation fan too, the first, youngest South African woman pilot (now former South African), so we do share something in common.

Regards, Caront 13:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Akradecki has asked me to keep an eye on his talk pgae for him. Let me answer your question about the article on "emoze".  I have viewd the deleted version and agree with Alans deletion. Below are a few reasons as to why

These are just a few reasons as to why this article was probably deleted. Remeber that all articles need to be cited by reliable sources that assert the notability of the topic in question. Otherwise it is just an article trying to promote your company which is not what wikipedia is for. Hope this helps. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) The page starts off with a link to a company, a sign that an article is often spam.
 * 2) Your articles does not give a good assertion as to why this group is notable
 * 3) Even if it did assert notability, as this organisation recieved third party coverage? (Not an interal press release)
 * Before your company can have an article you need to provide references from an external third party source? has this product recieved coverage from a news souce (CNN, ABC News etc etc).  Has this product received an independant review through a magazine?  Please read wikipedia's information on reliable source.  If you can provide reliable sources, I will not object to re-creation of the article. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi Chris, yes, there are external sources or independent reviews, one which was in the Wall Street Journal this week, written by Jessica E. Vascellaro (for example). I haven't a clue how to give this information to you guys. I don't really find the WIkipedia very user-friendly? Please help me. Regards, Caront 13:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi Caront, I'm back from vacation. If you have anymore questions that Chris hasn't answered about my deletion of emoze, let me know.  AK Radecki Speaketh  18:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC)