User talk:Caroruguita/Animal sanctuary/Danielagordillo Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

Whose work are you reviewing? (Caroruguita)

Link to draft you're reviewing: Animal sanctuary

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes

Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes

Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes, the article should talk more about shelter vs sanctuary since it is mentioned in the Lead.

Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I think is concise

Lead evaluation

Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes it is.

Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.

Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Some content is missing, but all the content belong to the article.

Content evaluation

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral? Yes

Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.

Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No but is stating what a sanctuary is and in a great way teaching people how is beneficial to animals

Tone and balance evaluation

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.

Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.

Are the sources current? Yes.

Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Sources and references evaluation

Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, is clear and concise.

Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.

Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, it would be great if it has more section in the future because is a topic very important.

Organization evaluation

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes.

Are images well-captioned? Yes.

Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes.

Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes

Images and media evaluation

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes.

How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? It only has 2 references, I think it could have more to reflect more available literature that exist.

Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes.

Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes.

New Article Evaluation

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes is more complete.

What are the strengths of the content added? Give more information to readers.

How can the content added be improved? Adding more content and more sources

Overall evaluation

The article have a great beginning, I know that when the article is done will be perfect. The information is very clear and concise like the picture that was a added. More sources should be added so the reader could have more background information. Nice work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielagordillo (talk • contribs) 20:51, 13 April 2020 (UTC)