User talk:Carouselambra

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

It looks like you were trying to create a redirect at The Lovers (SNL). I've adjusted the code so the article redirects to Lovers (SNL). You can create a redirect by replacing all text in the article with this line:


 * 1) RedirectTarget

and replacing Target with a wikilink to the target article. You can learn more at Redirect. Again, welcome! -- Vary | Talk 19:51, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

pasta primavera
WIKIPEDIA IS NOT AN INSTRUCTION GUIDE. SINCE WHEN DO ENCYCLOPEDIAS USE SECOND PERSON VOICE? JESUS CHRIST. DIE IN A FIRE. (Unsigned by 192.249.47.9, June 5)
 * Despite what 192.x said, I think that the Pasta Primavera article is actually quite nice. The recipie part had to be removed, with Wikipedia not being a cookbook and all. But the meat of the article--no pun intended, I swear--about various preperations of it is still perfectly valid. So hey. At least one person likes it. Ourai 04:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:HCPD.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HCPD.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:HCPD.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HCPD.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  PxMa 23:25, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 10-13
A tag has been placed on 10-13 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ohmpandya  ( Talk to Me... )  22:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 10-13
I have nominated 10-13, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/10-13. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Keilana talk 22:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem
Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.


 * Image:FWPD Patch.jpg
 * Image:FWPD Shield.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --04:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Haltom City Police Department
I changed Haltom City Police Department (Texas)‎ into a redirect to Haltom City, Texas. See Talk:Haltom City Police Department (Texas)‎. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  19:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barry Gibb Talk Show


The article Barry Gibb Talk Show has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No valid sourcing, no legit assertion of notability, generally subjective

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barry Gibb Talk Show


The article Barry Gibb Talk Show has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * SNL sketch that doesn't meet notability guidelines. No decent sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 05:42, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Barry Gibb Talk Show for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barry Gibb Talk Show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Barry Gibb Talk Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 15:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)